Cited by 64Epilepsy research and treatmentPharmacological Effects and Toxicity StudiesDevelopmental and Educational Neuropsychology

The DOI matches its Crossref record; 13 of the 13 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.

Prospective follow-up of intellectual development in children with a recent onset of epilepsy

Abstract

In this study the intellectual development of children with a recent onset of epilepsy was compared to that of children without epilepsy. Eleven children aged 7-15 years and with mean duration of epilepsy of 2 years and 38 children without epilepsy performed three times the dutch Wechsler intelligence scale for children-revised and the Beery developmental test for visuo-motor integration. The children with epilepsy did show a significantly less gain in FSIQ score over the 11 years of follow-up. Performance intelligence scores and Beery standardized scores showed a trend towards this effect. Findings partly support the hypothesized cascadic model of deterioration, in which children with epilepsy are supposed to show a process of mental deterioration shortly after the onset of epilepsy. The lack of evidence of an absolute mental deterioration are discussed in terms of methodology, mental age and premorbid intelligence level.

Overview

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1016/s0920-1211(98)00118-1

Cites

13 of 13 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Verification

Claims the paper makes

This paper’s full text isn’t openly available, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

Citations

Cites

Show all 13 references

Research works printed but not linked: 1

  1. Aldenkamp, 1992, Posttraumatic Epilepsy after closed head injury: a model for assessing intellectual deterioration, Boletim da Epilepsia, 1, 8

Cited by

Sorted by citations

See all 64

Metadata

Authors
Neyens, L. G. J., Aldenkamp, A. P., & Meinardi, H. M.
Affiliations
  • Stichting Epilepsie Instellingen Nederland (NL)
  • Kempenhaeghe (NL)
Corresponding author
Neyens, Lidwien G.J
Venue
Epilepsy Research
Publisher
Elsevier BV
Published
1999-04
Volume
34
Issue
2-3
Pages
85-90
ISSN
0920-1211 (ISSN-L)
OpenAlex
W2166627169
Cited by
64
References
13
Citations by year
2023: 1 · 2021: 5 · 2020: 1 · 2019: 2 · 2017: 1 · 2016: 4 · 2015: 1 · 2014: 4 · 2013: 2 · 2012: 7
FWCI
1.90
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed
Locations
  • Epilepsy Research (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
  • UvA-DARE (University of Amsterdam) (publishedVersion)
  • Data Archiving and Networked Services (DANS) (submittedVersion)
Topics
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Clinical Neurology › Epilepsy research and treatment
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Pediatrics, Perinatology and Child Health › Pharmacological Effects and Toxicity Studies
  • Social Sciences › Psychology › Neuropsychology and Physiological Psychology › Developmental and Educational Neuropsychology
Keywords
pediatric epilepsy, intellectual development, cognitive decline, intelligence quotient, visual-motor integration, WISC-R, premorbid intelligence, mental age
MeSH terms
Adolescent, Child, Child Development, Epilepsy, Follow-Up Studies, Humans, Intelligence, Intelligence Tests, Language Tests, Neuropsychological Tests, Prospective Studies, Reference Values, Wechsler Scales

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review

How to cite

Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.

This page
CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Prospective follow-up of intellectual development in children with a recent onset of epilepsy. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1016/s0920-1211(98)00118-1
The paper
Neyens, L. G. J., Aldenkamp, A. P., & Meinardi, H. M. (1999). Prospective follow-up of intellectual development in children with a recent onset of epilepsy. Epilepsy Research. https://doi.org/10.1016/s0920-1211(98)00118-1