Behavioral neurodevelopment abnormalities and schizophrenic disorder: a retrospective evaluation with the Childhood Behavior Checklist (CBCL)
Abstract
This study is a retrospective report of childhood and adolescence neurobehavioral assessment in patients with schizophrenia and their healthy siblings using the Childhood Behavior Checklist (CBCL). The CBCL ratings were obtained from retrospective maternal reports, for five age periods (birth to 3years, 4-7years, 8-11years, 12-15years and 16-18years) in a sample of 32 patients with schizophrenia. The patients showed a variety of childhood and adolescence behavioral problems when compared with their siblings, and the various types of problems differed in the developmental course of the disease. Cluster analysis was conducted on the childhood premorbid behavior ratings for the schizophrenic patients, and two subgroups emerged: a cluster with an initially low level of behavioral abnormalities (B.A. ) that increased over the years, and a cluster with a high level of B.A. that remain relatively stable until early adulthood. The latter group showed more severe current negative symptoms.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Claims the paper makes
Claims other papers make about this one
Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?
The CBCL is widely used in pediatric psychiatry.
“The CBCL was developed by Achenbach et al. for the comprehensive assessment of children’s emotional and behavioral problems [61] and is widely used in pediatric psychiatry [62–65].”
Cited by
Sorted by citations
Ross, R. G., Hunter, S. K., Hoffman, M. C., McCarthy, L., Chambers, B. M., Law, A. J., Leonard, S., Zerbe, G. O., & Freedman, R. (2016) · American Journal of Psychiatry · doi:10.1176/appi.ajp.2015.15091188 · Cited by 123 · see citing works
“73) subscales, the symptoms with the highest predictive value for later schizophrenia (40).”
BackgroundHamasaki, Y., Pionnié-Dax, N., Dorard, G., Tajan, N., & Hikida, T. (2021) · Child Psychiatry & Human Development · doi:10.1007/s10578-020-01064-8 · Cited by 77 · see citing works
Hamasaki, Y., Pionnié-Dax, N., Dorard, G., Tajan, N., & Hikida, T. (2022) · BMC Psychiatry · doi:10.1186/s12888-022-04116-6 · Cited by 32 · see citing works
Li, Y., & Freedman, R. (2020) · Pediatric Investigation · doi:10.1002/ped4.12199 · Cited by 13 · see citing works
- Authors
- Rossi, A., Pollice, R., Daneluzzo, E., Marinangeli, M. G., & Stratta, P.
- Affiliations
- University of L'Aquila (IT)
- Corresponding author
- Rossi, A
- ORCID
- Venue
- Schizophrenia Research
- Publisher
- Elsevier BV
- Published
- 2000-08
- Volume
- 44
- Issue
- 2
- Pages
- 121-128
- ISSN
- 0920-9964 (ISSN-L)
- OpenAlex
- W2093446982
- Cited by
- 50
- References
- 0
- Citations by year
- 2023: 1 · 2022: 2 · 2021: 5 · 2020: 6 · 2019: 2 · 2018: 1 · 2017: 2 · 2016: 4 · 2015: 2 · 2013: 4
- FWCI
- 0.70
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
- Locations
- Schizophrenia Research (publishedVersion)
- PubMed (publishedVersion)
- Archivio Istituzionale della Ricerca - Università degli Studi dell Aquila (submittedVersion)
- Topics
- Health Sciences › Medicine › Psychiatry and Mental health › Schizophrenia research and treatment
- Social Sciences › Psychology › Clinical Psychology › Child and Adolescent Psychosocial and Emotional Development
- Life Sciences › Neuroscience › Cognitive Neuroscience › Autism Spectrum Disorder Research
- Keywords
- schizophrenia, neurodevelopmental abnormalities
- MeSH terms
- Adolescent, Adult, Brain, Child, Child Behavior Disorders, Developmental Disabilities, Child, Preschool, Female, Humans, Male, Surveys and Questionnaires, Retrospective Studies, Schizophrenia, Cluster Analysis
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
