Towards sustainable use of the renewable resource wood in the Netherlands — a systematic approach
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Claims the paper makes
Claims other papers make about this one
Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?
There is a strong barrier in the difficulty to correlate possible measures with end users.
“Lafleur and Fraanje (1997) deal with the possibility of increasing the implementation of cascading practices and indicate a strong barrier in the difficulty to correlate possible measures with end users.”
From Transforming the bio-based sector towards a circular economy: What can we learn from wood cascading? (2020) · cites this paper as Lafleur and Fraanje, 1997
Cites
Fraanje, P. J. (1997) · Resources, Conservation and Recycling · doi:10.1016/s0921-3449(96)01159-7 · Cited by 77 · see citing works
Self-citation
Flagged first, then by citations
Cited by
Sorted by citations
Transforming the bio-based sector towards a circular economy: What can we learn from wood cascading?
Jarre, M., Petit-Boix, A., Priefer, C., Meyer, R., & Leipold, S. (2020) · Forest Policy and Economics · doi:10.1016/j.forpol.2019.01.017 · Cited by 166 · see citing works
Cascading utilization of wood: a matter of circular economy?
Mair, C., & Stern, T. (2017) · Current Forestry Reports · doi:10.1007/s40725-017-0067-y · Cited by 101 · see citing works
Höglmeier, K., Weber-Blaschke, G., & Richter, K. (2017) · Resources, Conservation and Recycling · doi:10.1016/j.resconrec.2015.10.030 · Cited by 56 · see citing works
- Authors
- Lafleur, M. C. C., & Fraanje, P. J.
- Affiliations
- University of Amsterdam (NL)
- Corresponding author
- Lafleur, Marije C.C.
- Venue
- Resources, Conservation and Recycling
- Publisher
- Elsevier BV
- Published
- 1997-06
- Volume
- 20
- Issue
- 1
- Pages
- 19-29
- ISSN
- 0921-3449 (ISSN-L)
- OpenAlex
- W2155074988
- Cited by
- 21
- References
- 1
- Citations by year
- 2026: 1 · 2022: 3 · 2020: 1 · 2019: 2 · 2017: 1 · 2015: 1 · 2014: 1 · 2013: 1 · 2012: 1
- FWCI
- 0.43
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
- Locations
- Resources Conservation and Recycling (publishedVersion)
- UvA-DARE (University of Amsterdam) (publishedVersion)
- Data Archiving and Networked Services (DANS) (submittedVersion)
- Funders
- Nederlandse Organisatie voor Wetenschappelijk Onderzoek
- Topics
- Physical Sciences › Environmental Science › Global and Planetary Change › Forest Management and Policy
- Life Sciences › Agricultural and Biological Sciences › Forestry › Agricultural and Food Sciences
- Life Sciences › Agricultural and Biological Sciences › General Agricultural and Biological Sciences › Bioeconomy and Sustainability Development
- Keywords
- wood consumption, wood substitute, renewable resources, forest pressure, Netherlands
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
