Cited by 56Agricultural and Food SciencesRecycled Aggregate Concrete PerformanceSustainability and Ecological Systems Analysis

Potentials for cascading of recovered wood from building deconstruction—A case study for south-east Germany

Höglmeier, Karin, Weber-Blaschke, Gabriele, Richter, Klaus·2017·Resources, Conservation and Recycling

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1016/j.resconrec.2015.10.030

Cites

19 of 19 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

We couldn’t retrieve this paper’s full text, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • A large amount of material waste is generated by the demolition sector, including timber that can be reused or recycled for structural purposes.

    “A large amount of material waste is generated by the demolition sector, including timber that can be reused or recycled for structural purposes [1 -4].”
  • Improvements in project planning and the emergence of new technologies for better design of wooden products have been mentioned as enabling factors for more and better cascading implementation.

    “In particular, improvements in project planning (Fraanje, 1998;Höglmeier et al., 2017;Winder and Bobar, 2018) and the emergence of new technologies for better design of wooden products (Brunet-Navarro et al., 2018;Winder and Bobar, 2018) have been mentioned as enabling factors for more and better cascading implementation.”
  • Höglmeier et al. (2017) suggest that a deep level of knowledge is necessary during the design phase of the materials as well as the construction and deconstruction phases.

    “Höglmeier et al. (2017) suggest that a deep level of knowledge is necessary during the design phase of the materials as well as the construction and deconstruction phases.”
  • Wood quality, particle size, and moisture content are fundamental physical requirements for cascading.

    “Another set of fundamental physical requirements includes wood quality (Höglmeier et al., 2017;Husgafvel et al., 2018;Kalcher et al., 2017;Rettenmaier et al., 2014;Winder and Bobar, 2018), particle size (Höglmeier et al., 2017;Höglmeier et al., 2015a;Husgafvel et al., 2018;Kalcher et al., 2017) and moisture content (Husgafvel et al., 2018;Knauf, 2015;Rettenmaier et al., 2014).”
  • The difficulty of involving the most relevant stakeholders of the wood product chains - producers and consumers - is a relevant limiting factor.

    “In particular, some authors indicate the difficulty of involving the most relevant stakeholders of the wood product chains -, producers and consumers -as a relevant limiting factor (Fraanje, 1997;Höglmeier et al., 2017;Keegan et al., 2013).”

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

3 of the 22 references couldn’t be matched to a known paper.

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Höglmeier, K., Weber-Blaschke, G., & Richter, K.
Affiliations
Technical University of Munich (DE)
Corresponding author
Höglmeier, Karin
Venue
Resources, Conservation and Recycling
Publisher
Elsevier BV
Published
2017-02
Volume
117
Pages
304-314
ISSN
0921-3449 (ISSN-L)
OpenAlex
W4247039074
Cited by
56
References
22
Citations by year
2026: 6 · 2025: 8 · 2024: 8 · 2023: 9 · 2022: 6 · 2021: 2 · 2020: 4 · 2019: 7 · 2018: 2 · 2017: 3 · 2016: 1
FWCI
6.26
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed
Locations
Resources Conservation and Recycling (publishedVersion)
Funders
Bavarian State Ministry of Food, Agriculture and Forestry
Topics
  • Life Sciences › Agricultural and Biological Sciences › Forestry › Agricultural and Food Sciences
  • Physical Sciences › Engineering › Building and Construction › Recycled Aggregate Concrete Performance
  • Physical Sciences › Environmental Science › Environmental Engineering › Sustainability and Ecological Systems Analysis
Keywords
recovered wood, building deconstruction, secondary resources, building stock, wood products, demolition waste, wood reuse

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review