Student or educator? Sign up with your school email and get 6 months of Pro free.
CoChat
Sign Up
Cited by 358

The DOI matches its Crossref record; 20 of the 20 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.

Autominder: an intelligent cognitive orthotic system for people with memory impairment

Pollack, Martha E., Brown, Laura, Colbry, Dirk, McCarthy, Colleen E., Orosz, Cheryl, Peintner, Bart, Ramakrishnan, Sailesh, Tsamardinos, Ioannis·2003·Robotics and Autonomous Systems
DOI 10.1016/s0921-8890(03)00077-0
Open this paper in CoChat — free account

Overview

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1016/s0921-8890(03)00077-0

Cites

20 of 20 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Verification

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Citations

Cites

Show all 20 references

Research works printed but not linked: 9

  1. M.M. Dowds, K. Robinson, Assistive technology for memory impairment: Palmtop computers and TBI, in: Proceedings of the Braintree Hospital Traumatic Brain Injury Neurorehabilitation Conference, 1996.
  2. C.E. McCarthy, A plan-based cognitive orthotic for reminding, Ph.D. Dissertation, Department of Computer Science, University of Pittsburgh, 2002.
  3. C. Miller, V. Riley, The independent lifestyle assistant, in: Proceedings of the XVII World Congress of the International Association of Gerontology, 2001.
  4. A. Oddi, A. Cesta, Incremental forward checking for the disjunctive temporal problem, in: Proceedings of the 14th European Conference on Artificial Intelligence, IOS Press, 2000, pp. 108–112.
  5. Pollack, 1999, There’s more to life than making plans: plan management in dynamic environments, AI Magazine, 20, 71
  6. M.E. Pollack, C. McCarthy et al., Autominder: a planning, monitoring, and reminding assistive agent, in: Proceedings of the Seventh International Conference on Intelligent Autonomous Systems, IOS Press, 2002, pp. 265–272.
  7. I. Tsamardinos, M.E. Pollack, Efficient solution techniques for disjunctive temporal reasoning problems, Artificial Intelligence, to appear. doi:10.1016/S0004-3702(03)00113-9. · doi:10.1016/s0004-3702(03)00113-9
  8. I. Tsamardinos, M.E. Pollack, J.F. Horty, Merging plans with quantitative temporal constraints, temporally extended actions, and conditional branches, in: Proceedings of the Fifth International Conference on Artificial Intelligence Planning and Scheduling, 2000, pp. 264–272.
  9. I. Tsamardinos, T. Vidal, M.E. Pollack, CTP: a new constraint-based formalism for conditional, temporal planning. Constraints 8 (4) (2003), to appear. · doi:10.1023/a:1025894003623

Cited by

See all 358

Metadata

Authors
Pollack, M. E., Brown, L., Colbry, D., McCarthy, C. E., Orosz, C., Peintner, B., Ramakrishnan, S., & Tsamardinos, I.
Venue
Robotics and Autonomous Systems
Publisher
Elsevier BV
Published
2003-09
Volume
44
Issue
3-4
Pages
273-282
ISSN
0921-8890 (ISSN-L)
DOI
10.1016/s0921-8890(03)00077-0
OpenAlex
W1978640248
Cited by
358
References
20
FWCI
20.33
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed
Licence
www.elsevier.com/tdm/userlicense/1.0/ (tdm)

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review

How to cite

Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.

This page
CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Autominder: an intelligent cognitive orthotic system for people with memory impairment. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1016/s0921-8890(03)00077-0
The paper
Pollack, M. E., Brown, L., Colbry, D., McCarthy, C. E., Orosz, C., Peintner, B., Ramakrishnan, S., & Tsamardinos, I. (2003). Autominder: an intelligent cognitive orthotic system for people with memory impairment. Robotics and Autonomous Systems. https://doi.org/10.1016/s0921-8890(03)00077-0

Data sources

Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.

Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).

Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.