Cited by 488Context-Aware Activity Recognition SystemsTime Series Analysis and ForecastingHuman Mobility and Location-Based Analysis

Activity recognition on streaming sensor data

Open access
Krishnan, Narayanan C., Cook, Diane J.·2014·Pervasive and Mobile Computing

Abstract

Many real-world applications that focus on addressing needs of a human, require information about the activities being performed by the human in real-time. While advances in pervasive computing have lead to the development of wireless and non-intrusive sensors that can capture the necessary activity information, current activity recognition approaches have so far experimented on either a scripted or pre-segmented sequence of sensor events related to activities. In this paper we propose and evaluate a sliding window based approach to perform activity recognition in an on line or streaming fashion; recognizing activities as and when new sensor events are recorded. To account for the fact that different activities can be best characterized by different window lengths of sensor events, we incorporate the time decay and mutual information based weighting of sensor events within a window. Additional contextual information in the form of the previous activity and the activity of the previous window is also appended to the feature describing a sensor window. The experiments conducted to evaluate these techniques on real-world smart home datasets suggests that combining mutual information based weighting of sensor events and adding past contextual information into the feature leads to best performance for streaming activity recognition.

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1016/j.pmcj.2012.07.003

Cites

43 of 43 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • Naïve Bayes classifiers often work much better than expected, especially when a specific group of sensors can easily be identified as characteristic of a certain activity.

    “In multiple cases, in spite of its simple design and simplified assumptions, naïve Bayes classifiers often work much better than expected, especially when a specific group of sensors can easily be identified as characteristic of a certain activity [9].”

    From Sensor-Based Early Activity Recognition Inside Buildings to Support Energy and Comfort Management Systems (2019) · cites this paper as [9]

    Section 2.2 (page not provided) says simple naïve Bayes classifiers have yielded promising results for offline activity recognition when ample training data is available. Section 5.2 also says the authors had used naïve Bayes successfully, but neither passage says it performs better than expected or links its performance to identifying a group of sensors characteristic of an activity. (LLM, conf=0.82)

    Experimental — accuracy not yet measured

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Research works printed but not linked: 2

  1. [1]Cook D Schmitter-Edgecombe M Crandall A Sanders C Thomas B Collecting and disseminating smart home sensor data in the casas project Proceedings of the CHI Workshop on Developing Shared Home Behavior Datasets to Advance HCI and Ubiquitous Computing Research 2009
  2. [16]Krishnan NC Colbry D Juillard C Panchanathan S Real time human activity recognition using tri-axial accelerometers Sensors Signals and Information Processing Workshop 2008

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Krishnan, N. C., & Cook, D. J.
Affiliations
Washington State University (US)
Corresponding author
Krishnan, Narayanan C.
Venue
Pervasive and Mobile Computing
Publisher
Elsevier BV
Published
2014-02
Volume
10
Issue
Pt B
Pages
138-154
ISSN
1574-1192 (ISSN-L)
OpenAlex
W2135090840
Cited by
488
References
43
Citations by year
2026: 7 · 2025: 10 · 2024: 17 · 2023: 16 · 2022: 31 · 2021: 37 · 2020: 36 · 2019: 55 · 2018: 70 · 2017: 72 · 2016: 61 · 2015: 48 · 2014: 17 · 2013: 11
FWCI
25.04
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Locations
  • Pervasive and Mobile Computing (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed Central (acceptedVersion)
Funders
  • National Institutes of Health
  • National Institute of Biomedical Imaging and Bioengineering (R01EB009675, R01EB015853)
Topics
  • Physical Sciences › Computer Science › Computer Vision and Pattern Recognition › Context-Aware Activity Recognition Systems
  • Physical Sciences › Computer Science › Signal Processing › Time Series Analysis and Forecasting
  • Social Sciences › Transportation › Human Mobility and Location-Based Analysis
Keywords
activity recognition, streaming sensor data, sliding window, online recognition, contextual features, home automation, non-intrusive sensors, ubiquitous computing

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review