Social identification effects in product and process development teams
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Claims the paper makes
Claims other papers make about this one
Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?
Social identification, and as a consequence social capital, is related to group homogeneity, an antecedent of groupthink.
“It follows that social identification, and as a consequence SC, is related to group homogeneity, one of the most significant antecedents of groupthink.”
From The Negative Effects of Social Capital in Organizations: A Review and Extension (2017) · cites this paper as Scott 1997
Cites
Product development: Past research, present findings and future directions
Brown, S. L., & Eisenhardt, K. M. (1995) · The Academy of Management Review · doi:10.2307/258850 · Cited by 3,777 · see citing works
Who is this "We"? Levels of collective identity and self representations.
Brewer, M. B., & Gardner, W. (1996) · Journal of Personality and Social Psychology · doi:10.1037/0022-3514.71.1.83 · Cited by 3,401 · see citing works
The Effects of Communication on Technological Innovation
Ebadi, Y. M., & Utterback, J. M. (1984) · Management Science · doi:10.1287/mnsc.30.5.572 · Cited by 255 · see citing works
Flagged first, then by citations
Cited by
Sorted by citations
The Negative Effects of Social Capital in Organizations: A Review and Extension
Pillai, K. G., Hodgkinson, G. P., Kalyanaram, G., & Nair, S. R. (2017) · International Journal of Management Reviews · doi:10.1111/ijmr.12085 · Cited by 185 · see citing works
- Authors
- Scott, S. G.
- Affiliations
- University of Colorado Colorado Springs (US)
- Corresponding author
- Scott, Susanne G.
- Venue
- Journal of Engineering and Technology Management
- Publisher
- Elsevier BV
- Published
- 1997-06
- Volume
- 14
- Issue
- 2
- Pages
- 97-127
- ISSN
- 0923-4748 (ISSN-L)
- OpenAlex
- W2049454430
- Cited by
- 98
- References
- 3
- Citations by year
- 2025: 2 · 2024: 1 · 2023: 4 · 2022: 3 · 2021: 1 · 2020: 1 · 2019: 3 · 2018: 3 · 2017: 4 · 2016: 4 · 2015: 1 · 2014: 6 · 2013: 8 · 2012: 11
- FWCI
- 1.42
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
- Locations
- Journal of Engineering and Technology Management (publishedVersion)
- Topics
- Social Sciences › Psychology › Social Psychology › Team Dynamics and Performance
- Social Sciences › Sociology and Political Science › Social and Intergroup Psychology
- Social Sciences › Decision Sciences › Management Science and Operations Research › Construction Project Management and Performance
- Keywords
- social identification, team performance, product development teams, social identity theory, social categorization theory, group effectiveness, team cohesion, external communication, top management support, recognition, time commitment, functional diversity, manufacturing companies
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
