Cited by 167Digital Media Forensic DetectionAdvanced Steganography and Watermarking TechniquesImage Retrieval and Classification Techniques

Content-based image copy detection

Kim, Changick·2003·Signal Processing Image Communication

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1016/s0923-5965(02)00130-3

Cites

25 of 25 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

We couldn’t retrieve this paper’s full text, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

1 of the 26 references couldn’t be matched to a known paper.

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Kim, C.
Affiliations
Epson (United States) (US)
Corresponding author
Kim, Changick
Venue
Signal Processing Image Communication
Publisher
Elsevier BV
Published
2003-03
Volume
18
Issue
3
Pages
169-184
ISSN
0923-5965 (ISSN-L)
OpenAlex
W2038128495
Cited by
165
References
26
Citations by year
2026: 1 · 2025: 2 · 2024: 3 · 2023: 2 · 2022: 3 · 2021: 12 · 2020: 6 · 2019: 8 · 2018: 5 · 2017: 2 · 2016: 12 · 2015: 8 · 2014: 8 · 2013: 13 · 2012: 11
FWCI
4.14
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed
Locations
Signal Processing Image Communication (publishedVersion)
Topics
  • Physical Sciences › Computer Science › Computer Vision and Pattern Recognition › Digital Media Forensic Detection
  • Physical Sciences › Computer Science › Computer Vision and Pattern Recognition › Advanced Steganography and Watermarking Techniques
  • Physical Sciences › Computer Science › Computer Vision and Pattern Recognition › Image Retrieval and Classification Techniques
Keywords
image copy detection, discrete cosine transform, AC coefficients, image watermarking

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review