Clinical Implications of Anxiety in Diabetes: A Critical Review of the Evidence Base
Open accessAbstract
Introduction: Substantial literature supports clinically important associations between anxiety and chronic medical conditions. Diabetes is among the most psychologically and behaviorally demanding chronic medical illnesses. Anxiety has been associated with poor glycemic control, regimen adherence, and with accelerated rates of coronary heart disease in diabetic patients. Aim: The aim of this study is to provide an overview of the role of clinically significant anxiety in patients with diabetes mellitus. Methods: MEDLINE, EMBASE and PSYCINFO databases were searched using the combined search terms diabetes, diabetes mellitus, anxiety symptoms and anxiety disorders. Published reference lists were also examined. In total 25 studies were identified that fulfilled the inclusion criteria. Results: Anxiety was present in 41.7% of diabetic patients. There was no significant difference between those with Types 1 and types 2 diabetes. The rate of elevated symptoms was significantly higher in diabetic women than in diabetic men. General anxiety disorder was the most prevalent of the clinical disorders and was found in 13.2% of the diabetic patients. The rates of the other anxiety disorders were within the range of those reported in community studies. Treatment of anxiety was associated with improved glycemic control, particularly in the subgroup of patients with severe anxiety. Conclusions: Emerging data offer a strong argument for the role of anxiety in diabetes. Psychological interventions and/ or pharmacological treatments in patients with diabetes are needed, in order to increase treatment adherence and control of the disease and improve patients’ functioning and quality of life.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Claims the paper makes
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The text we found for this paper looks like another document, so the self-check wasn’t run.
Cited by
Sorted by citations
Young-Hyman, D., de Groot, M., Hill-Briggs, F., Gonzalez, J. S., Hood, K., & Peyrot, M. (2016) · Diabetes Care · doi:10.2337/dc16-2053 · Cited by 1,072 · see citing works
ElSayed, N. A., Aleppo, G., Aroda, V. R., Bannuru, R. R., Brown, F. M., Bruemmer, D., Collins, B. S., Hilliard, M. E., Isaacs, D., Johnson, E. L., et al. (2023) · Diabetes Care · doi:10.2337/dc23-s005 · Cited by 362 · see citing works
American Diabetes Association Professional Practice Committee (2022) · Diabetes Care · doi:10.2337/dc22-s005 · Cited by 445 · see citing works
- Authors
- Mitsonis, C., Dimopoulos, N., & Psarra, V.
- Affiliations
- National and Kapodistrian University of Athens (GR)
- ORCID
- Psarra, V.
- Venue
- European Psychiatry
- Publisher
- Cambridge University Press (CUP)
- Published
- 2009-01
- Volume
- 24
- Issue
- S1
- ISSN
- 0924-9338 (ISSN-L)
- 1778-3585
- OpenAlex
- W2044924195
- Cited by
- 19
- References
- 0
- Citations by year
- 2026: 1 · 2024: 1 · 2023: 1 · 2022: 1 · 2021: 1 · 2020: 1 · 2019: 1 · 2018: 1 · 2017: 3 · 2016: 2 · 2014: 3 · 2012: 1
- FWCI
- 0.73
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- bronze
- doi.org
- Locations
- European Psychiatry (publishedVersion)
- Topics
- Health Sciences › Medicine › Endocrinology, Diabetes and Metabolism › Diabetes Management and Education
- Social Sciences › Psychology › Experimental and Cognitive Psychology › Anxiety, Depression, Psychometrics, Treatment, Cognitive Processes
- Health Sciences › Medicine › Endocrinology, Diabetes and Metabolism › Diabetes Management and Research
- Keywords
- anxiety, diabetes mellitus, glycemic control, medication adherence, coronary artery disease, generalized anxiety disorder, type 1 diabetes, type 2 diabetes, sex differences, psychological intervention, pharmacological treatment of anxiety, quality of life
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review