Cited by 1Schizophrenia research and treatmentHealthcare Decision-Making and RestraintsPsychiatric care and mental health services

P03-55 - The Correlates of Subjective Admission Experience of Patients with Schizophrenia in Hong Kong

Open access
Fu, C.K.J., Chow, P.L.P., Lam, C.W.L.·2010·European Psychiatry

Abstract

Objective Admission experience has been shown to be related to insight and treatment adherence. We evaluated the clinical correlates of the Chinese Admission Experience Survey (C-AES). Methods A four-week longitudinal correlation study was carried out to investigate the relationship between admission experience and clinical variables. The C-AES was administered to 40 patients with schizophrenia within 48 hours of admission as a baseline, followed by subsequent interviews at two weeks and four weeks post-admission. Degree of insight into disease, attitude towards prescription, medication side effects and psychiatric symptomatology were assessed using established instruments, namely the Scale to Assess Unawareness of Mental Disorder (SUMD), the Drug Attitude Inventory (DAI), the Extrapyramidal Symptom Rating Scale (ESRS), the Scale for the Assessment of Negative Symptoms (SANS) and Scale for the Assessment of Positive Symptoms (SAPS). Regression by Generalised Estimating Equations (GEE) was used to evaluate the relationship between the clinical variables. Results An improvement in insight was associated with a reduction in perceived coercion (B = 0.261, p < 0.01) during the four-week treatment. An increase in atypical antipsychotic dosage in milligram of chlorpromazine equivalents predicted insight improvement (B = -0.001, p < 0.01). There was an associated improvement in attitude towards medication (B = -0.027, p < 0.01). These observations were independent on schizophrenic symptoms or extrapyrimidal side effects. Conclusions Improvement in insight is associated with a reduction in perceived coercion and a more positive attitude towards prescription, and is predicted by a higher dosage of atypical antipsychotic.

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1016/s0924-9338(10)71165-2

Cites

Statistics

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Fu, C. K. J., Chow, P. L. P., & Lam, C. W. L.
Affiliations
  • Tai Po Hospital (CN)
  • Castle Peak Hospital (CN)
Venue
European Psychiatry
Published
2010
Volume
25
Issue
S1
ISSN
  • 0924-9338 (ISSN-L)
  • 1778-3585
OpenAlex
W2034371529
Cited by
1
References
0
Citations by year
2025: 1
FWCI
0.00
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Locations
European Psychiatry (publishedVersion)
Topics
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Psychiatry and Mental health › Schizophrenia research and treatment
  • Social Sciences › Psychology › Clinical Psychology › Healthcare Decision-Making and Restraints
  • Social Sciences › Psychology › Clinical Psychology › Psychiatric care and mental health services
Keywords
schizophrenia, insight into illness, perceived coercion, atypical antipsychotics, antipsychotic dosing, chlorpromazine equivalents, medication adherence, extrapyramidal symptoms, negative symptoms, positive symptoms

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review