The DOI matches its Crossref record; 1 of the 1 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
Assessing safety culture in offshore environments
Open accessAbstract
This paper discusses a joint industry and UK Health and Safety Executive research project on the assessment of safety culture in offshore environments. It particularly describes the development of a safety culture assessment methodology which is based on a systems approach to organisational culture. This approach combines a number of assessment methods, such as: questionnaires, focus groups, behavioural observations and situational audits, to describe and explore the efficacy of health and safety management systems. The evidence produced by these methods are complementary rather than alternatives and provide different views of organisational health and safety culture by tapping many aspects of the organisation's structure, function and behaviour. The assessment techniques have been piloted within collaborating organisations, both within the UK and the Gulf of Mexico. The culmination of the work is the “Safety Climate Assessment Toolkit” which is now published and available for use by managers and safety professionals within the offshore oil extraction industry.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cites
Mixing Qualitative and Quantitative Methods: Triangulation in Action.
Jick, T. D. (1979) · Administrative Science Quarterly · doi:10.2307/2392366 · Cited by 7,103 · cited 2×
“It has been suggested (Jick, 1979) that organisational researchers and practitioners can improve the accuracy of their judgements by both utilising multiple methods and collecting dierent kinds of data bearing on the same phenomenon, in this case safety climate.”
Background
Cited by
Methods and models in process safety and risk management: Past, present and future
Khan, F., Rathnayaka, S., & Ahmed, S. (2015) · Process Safety and Environmental Protection · doi:10.1016/j.psep.2015.07.005 · Cited by 649
Vinodkumar, M. N., & Bhasi, M. (2010) · Accident Analysis & Prevention · doi:10.1016/j.aap.2010.06.021 · Cited by 538
A framework for understanding the development of organisational safety culture
Parker, D., Lawrie, M., & Hudson, P. (2006) · Safety Science · doi:10.1016/j.ssci.2005.10.004 · Cited by 295
Lotfi, M., Akhuleh, O. Z., Judi, A., & Khodayari, M. (2022) · Perioperative Care and Operating Room Management · doi:10.1016/j.pcorm.2021.100233 · Cited by 29
Metadata
- Authors
- Cox, S. J., & Cheyne, A. J. T.
- Venue
- Safety Science
- Publisher
- Elsevier BV
- Published
- 2000-02
- Volume
- 34
- Issue
- 1-3
- Pages
- 111-129
- ISSN
- 0925-7535 (ISSN-L)
- OpenAlex
- W2043035119
- Cited by
- 529
- References
- 1
- FWCI
- 9.91
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- green
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Assessing safety culture in offshore environments. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1016/s0925-7535(00)00009-6
- The paper
- Cox, S. J., & Cheyne, A. J. T. (2000). Assessing safety culture in offshore environments. Safety Science. https://doi.org/10.1016/s0925-7535(00)00009-6
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.