The DOI matches its Crossref record; 7 of the 7 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
Towards a model of safety culture
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cites
Self-efficacy: Toward a unifying theory of behavioral change
Bandura, A. (1977) · Psychological Review · doi:10.1037/0033-295x.84.2.191 · Cited by 43,925
A Theory of Cognitive Dissonance
Festinger, L. (1957) · doi:10.1515/9781503620766 · Cited by 24,241
Mixing Qualitative and Quantitative Methods: Triangulation in Action.
Jick, T. D. (1979) · Administrative Science Quarterly · doi:10.2307/2392366 · Cited by 7,103 · cited 2×
“Third, it provides a `triangulation' methodology with which to encourage multilevel analyses (Jick, 1979).”
MethodSocial cognitive theory of self-regulation
Bandura, A. (1991) · Organizational Behavior and Human Decision Processes · doi:10.1016/0749-5978(91)90022-l · Cited by 6,875
Hunter, J., & Schmidt, F. (2004) · doi:10.4135/9781412985031 · Cited by 3,023
Cultivating competence, self-efficacy, and intrinsic interest through proximal self-motivation.
Bandura, A., & Schunk, D. H. (1981) · Journal of Personality and Social Psychology · doi:10.1037/0022-3514.41.3.586 · Cited by 2,675 · cited 1×
“…incorporates the goal-setting paradigm (Wood and Bandura, 1989; Locke and Latham, 1990; Bandura, 1991) advocated above via the setting of sub-goals (Bandura and Schunk, 1981), via task-strategies (e.g. Locke et al., 1984b), via self-regulatory processes (e.g. Bandura, 1988), and via self-e cacy…”
MethodThe contribution of latent human failures to the breakdown of complex systems
Reason, J. (1990) · Philosophical Transactions of the Royal Society of London. B, Biological Sciences · doi:10.1098/rstb.1990.0090 · Cited by 762 · cited 1×
“…organisational (safety) `culture' for a number of reasons: ®rst, the psychological , behavioural and situational elements of the model precisely mirror those accident causation relationships found by a number of researchers (e.g. Weaver, 1971; Adams, 1976; Heinrich et al., 1980; Reason, 1990).”
Background
Cited by
Vogus, T. J., & Sutcliffe, K. M. (2007) · Medical Care · doi:10.1097/01.mlr.0000244635.61178.7a · Cited by 386
The use of questionnaires in safety culture research – an evaluation
Guldenmund, F. W. (2007) · Safety Science · doi:10.1016/j.ssci.2007.04.006 · Cited by 381
Safety climate and beyond: A multi-level multi-climate framework
Dov, Z. (2008) · Safety Science · doi:10.1016/j.ssci.2007.03.006 · Cited by 377
A cross-validation of safety climate scale using confirmatory factor analytic approach
Seo, D.-C., Torabi, M. R., Blair, E. H., & Ellis, N. T. (2004) · Journal of Safety Research · doi:10.1016/j.jsr.2004.04.006 · Cited by 324
A framework for understanding the development of organisational safety culture
Parker, D., Lawrie, M., & Hudson, P. (2006) · Safety Science · doi:10.1016/j.ssci.2005.10.004 · Cited by 295
Metadata
- Authors
- Cooper Ph.D., M. D.
- Venue
- Safety Science
- Publisher
- Elsevier BV
- Published
- 2000-11
- Volume
- 36
- Issue
- 2
- Pages
- 111-136
- ISSN
- 0925-7535 (ISSN-L)
- OpenAlex
- W2076535888
- Cited by
- 1,384
- References
- 7
- FWCI
- 18.83
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Towards a model of safety culture. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1016/s0925-7535(00)00035-7
- The paper
- Cooper Ph.D., M. D. (2000). Towards a model of safety culture. Safety Science. https://doi.org/10.1016/s0925-7535(00)00035-7
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.
