Cited by 792Nanomaterials for catalytic reactionsCatalytic Processes in Materials ScienceMesoporous Materials and Catalysis

Carbons as supports for industrial precious metal catalysts

Auer, E., Freund, A., Pietsch, J., Tacke, T.·1998·Applied Catalysis A: General

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1016/s0926-860x(98)00184-7

Cites

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

We couldn’t retrieve this paper’s full text, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Auer, E., Freund, A., Pietsch, J., & Tacke, T.
Corresponding author
Pietsch, J.
Venue
Applied Catalysis A: General
Publisher
Elsevier BV
Published
1998-10
Volume
173
Issue
2
Pages
259-271
ISSN
0926-860X (ISSN-L)
OpenAlex
W1982632848
Cited by
792
References
0
Citations by year
2026: 11 · 2025: 18 · 2024: 26 · 2023: 26 · 2022: 25 · 2021: 41 · 2020: 44 · 2019: 36 · 2018: 41 · 2017: 34 · 2016: 37 · 2015: 49 · 2014: 48 · 2013: 48 · 2012: 26
FWCI
6.34
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed
Locations
Applied Catalysis A General (publishedVersion)
Topics
  • Physical Sciences › Chemistry › Organic Chemistry › Nanomaterials for catalytic reactions
  • Physical Sciences › Materials Science › Materials Chemistry › Catalytic Processes in Materials Science
  • Physical Sciences › Materials Science › Materials Chemistry › Mesoporous Materials and Catalysis
Keywords
carbon-supported catalysts, noble metal catalysts, activated carbon, carbon black, graphite, catalyst supports, hydrogenation, industrial catalysis

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review