Cited by 100Astrophysics and Cosmic PhenomenaGamma-ray bursts and supernovaeDark Matter and Cosmic Phenomena

On the statistical significance of the GZK feature in the spectrum of ultra-high energy cosmic rays

Open access
De Marco, Daniel, Blasi, Pasquale, Olinto, Angela V.·2003·Astroparticle Physics

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1016/s0927-6505(03)00148-8

Cites

17 of 17 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • AGASA found trans-GZK events inconsistent with the GZK cutoff at 2.5σ.

    “AGASA found trans-GZK events inconsistent with the GZK cutoff at 2.5σ [96]”

    From Modern Tests of Lorentz Invariance (2005) · cites this paper as [96]

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Research works printed but not linked: 9

  1. [6][6] M. Takeda et al., Phys. Rev. Lett. 81 (1998) 1163; M. Takeda et al. preprint astro-ph/9902239 N. Hayashida et al. Phys. Rev. Lett. 73 (1994) 3491; D. J. Bird et al. Astrophys J. 441 (1995) 144; Phys. Rev. Lett. 71 (1993) 3401; Astrophys. J. 424 (1994) 491; M. A. Lawrence, R. J. O. Reid and A. A. Watson, J. Phys. G. Nucl. Part. Phys. 17 (1991) 773; N. N. Efimov et al., Ref. Proc. International Symposium on Astrophysical Aspects of the Most Energetic Cosmic Rays , eds. M. Nagano and F. Takahara (World Scientific, Singapore, 1991), p. 20 - · arXiv
  2. [7][7] S. C. Corbat´ o et al., Nucl. Phys. B (Proc. Suppl.) 28B (1992) 36 -
  3. [8][8] T. Abu-Zayyad, et al., preprint astro-ph/0208301 - · arXiv
  4. [9][9] T. Abu-Zayyad, et al., preprint astro-ph/0208243 - · arXiv
  5. [10][10] J. W. Cronin, Proceedings of ICRC 2001 (2001). -
  6. [12][12] R. E. Streitmatter, Proc. of Workshop on Observing Giant Cosmic Ray Air Showers from > 10 20 eV Particles from Space , eds. J. F. Krizmanic, J. F. Ormes, and R. E. Streitmatter (AIP Conference Proceedings 433, 1997). -
  7. [21][21] V. Berezinsky, A. Z. Gazizov and S. Grigorieva, preprint hep-ph/0204357. - · arXiv
  8. [22][22] M. Takeda et al., preprint astro-ph/0209422 - · arXiv
  9. [23][23] J.N. Bahcall and E. Waxman, preprint hep-ph/0206217 · arXiv

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
De Marco, D., Blasi, P., & Olinto, A. V.
Affiliations
University of Chicago (US)
Venue
Astroparticle Physics
Publisher
Elsevier BV
Published
2003-10
Volume
20
Issue
1
Pages
53-65
ISSN
0927-6505 (ISSN-L)
OpenAlex
W2074231179
Cited by
100
References
16
Citations by year
2024: 1 · 2017: 1 · 2016: 2 · 2013: 2
FWCI
12.97
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Locations
  • Astroparticle Physics (publishedVersion)
  • arXiv (Cornell University) (acceptedVersion)
  • arXiv (Cornell University)
Topics
  • Physical Sciences › Physics and Astronomy › Nuclear and High Energy Physics › Astrophysics and Cosmic Phenomena
  • Physical Sciences › Physics and Astronomy › Astronomy and Astrophysics › Gamma-ray bursts and supernovae
  • Physical Sciences › Physics and Astronomy › Nuclear and High Energy Physics › Dark Matter and Cosmic Phenomena
Keywords
GZK cutoff, ultra-high-energy cosmic rays, cosmic ray energy spectrum, cosmic microwave background, pion production, AGASA, HiRes, systematic errors, cosmic ray propagation, statistical significance, cosmic ray sources

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review