The DOI matches its Crossref record; 1 of the 1 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
Randomized trial of palliative two-fraction versus more intensive 13-fraction radiotherapy for patients with inoperable non-small cell lung cancer and good performance status
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cites
on behalf of the Medical Research Council (MRC) Lung Cancer Working Party, Hopwood, P., & Stephens, R. (1995) · British Journal of Cancer · doi:10.1038/bjc.1995.124 · Cited by 192
Self-citation
Cited by
Hopwood, P., Stephens, R. J., & for the British Medical Research Council Lung Cancer Working Party (2000) · Journal of Clinical Oncology · doi:10.1200/jco.2000.18.4.893 · Cited by 566
Self-citationPalliative Thoracic Radiotherapy for Lung Cancer: A Systematic Review
Fairchild, A., Harris, K., Barnes, E., Wong, R., Lutz, S., Bezjak, A., Cheung, P., & Chow, E. (2008) · Journal of Clinical Oncology · doi:10.1200/jco.2007.15.3312 · Cited by 270
Metadata
- Authors
- Medical Research Council Lung Cancer Working Party, Macbeth, F. R., Bolger, J. J., Hopwood, P., Bleehen, N. M., Cartmell, J., Girling, D. J., Machin, D., Stephens, R. J., & Bailey, A. J.
- Venue
- Clinical Oncology
- Publisher
- Elsevier BV
- Published
- 1996
- Volume
- 8
- Issue
- 3
- Pages
- 167-175
- ISSN
- 0936-6555 (ISSN-L)
- OpenAlex
- W2003574138
- Cited by
- 228
- References
- 1
- FWCI
- 7.70
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Randomized trial of palliative two-fraction versus more intensive 13-fraction radiotherapy for patients with inoperable non-small cell lung cancer and good performance status. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1016/s0936-6555(96)80041-0
- The paper
- Medical Research Council Lung Cancer Working Party, Macbeth, F. R., Bolger, J. J., Hopwood, P., Bleehen, N. M., Cartmell, J., Girling, D. J., Machin, D., Stephens, R. J., & Bailey, A. J. (1996). Randomized trial of palliative two-fraction versus more intensive 13-fraction radiotherapy for patients with inoperable non-small cell lung cancer and good performance status. Clinical Oncology. https://doi.org/10.1016/s0936-6555(96)80041-0
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.