Cultural comparison research designs in food, eating, and nutrition
Open accessAbstract
Culture plays a central role in shaping food, eating, and nutrition. Research that makes cultural comparisons extends our understanding of cultural generality and uniqueness. Several types of research designs can be used to make cultural comparisons, both synchronic (at one point in time) and diachronic (across time). Uni-cultural designs examine phenomena within cultural cases but do not explicitly make cultural comparisons. Sub-cultural designs compare cultural groups within a complex society in the form of ethnic group comparisons and acculturation studies. Cross-cultural designs examine differences between several cultures, investigating individuals in cross-national and migration studies and investigating societies in holocultural research and globalization analyses. When implementing research designs to make cultural comparisons, other methodological issues must be considered such as defining units of analysis, sampling cultures and individuals within cultures, and developing equivalent measurement procedures for different cultures. Specific consideration of research design and research method implementation can strengthen cultural comparison research in food, eating, and nutrition.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Claims the paper makes
Claims other papers make about this one
Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?
Culture plays a fundamental role in shaping food, eating, and nutrition, as well as waste generation.
“Culture plays a fundamental role in shaping food, eating, and nutrition (Rozin 2005, Sobal 1998), as well as waste generation.”
From Drivers of food waste and their implications for sustainable policy development (2016) · cites this paper as Sobal 1998
The citation lists haven’t been fetched yet
References 111 · Cited by 76
- Authors
- Sobal, J.
- Affiliations
- Cornell University (US)
- Corresponding author
- Sobal, Jeffery
- ORCID
- Sobal, Jeffery
- Venue
- Food Quality and Preference
- Publisher
- Elsevier BV
- Published
- 1998-11
- Volume
- 9
- Issue
- 6
- Pages
- 385-392
- ISSN
- 0950-3293 (ISSN-L)
- OpenAlex
- W2074181073
- Cited by
- 76
- References
- 111
- Citations by year
- 2026: 2 · 2025: 4 · 2024: 3 · 2023: 2 · 2022: 3 · 2021: 6 · 2020: 7 · 2019: 7 · 2018: 1 · 2017: 2 · 2016: 2 · 2015: 3 · 2014: 6 · 2013: 5
- FWCI
- 4.49
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- hybrid
- doi.org
- Licence
- Locations
- Food Quality and Preference (publishedVersion, cc-by-nc-nd)
- Topics
- Life Sciences › Agricultural and Biological Sciences › Food Science › Food, Nutrition, and Cultural Practices
- Social Sciences › Psychology › Social Psychology › Cultural Differences and Values
- Health Sciences › Nursing › Nutrition and Dietetics › Nutrition, Health and Food Behavior
- Keywords
- cultural comparison, food culture, dietary habits, nutrition, acculturation, ethnic group comparison, migration studies, globalization, measurement invariance, unit of analysis
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review