The DOI matches its Crossref record; 2 of the 2 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
Research in software engineering: an analysis of the literature
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cites
The illusory diffusion of innovation: An examination of assimilation gaps
Fichman, R. G., & Kemerer, C. F. (1999) · Information Systems Research · doi:10.1287/isre.10.3.255 · Cited by 633
Prospects for an engineering discipline of software
Shaw, M. (1990) · IEEE Software · doi:10.1109/52.60586 · Cited by 346
Research works printed but not linked: 28
- Alavi, 1992, A review of MIS research and disciplinary development: implications for Deans/Administrators, Journal of Management Information Systems, 8, 45, 10.1080/07421222.1992.11517938 · DOI · Paper page
- Barki, 1988, An information systems keyword classification scheme, MIS Quarterly, 12, 299, 10.2307/248855 · DOI
- M.J. Cheon, V. Grover, R. Sabherwal, The evolution of empirical research in IS: A study in IS maturity, Information and Management, 24 (1993) 107–119. · DOI
- Culnan, 1986, Research in management information systems 1980–1984: points of work and reference, MIS Quarterly, 10, 289, 10.2307/249263 · DOI · Paper page
- Farhoomand, 2000, A historiographical examination of information systems, Communication of the AIS, 1, 19
- Fenton, 1994, Science and substance: a challenge to software engineers, IEEE Software, July
- Glass, 2001, An assessment of systems and software engineering scholars and institutions, Journal of Systems and Software, 59, 1, 10.1016/S0164-1212(01)00052-8 · DOI
- Glass, 1995, Contemporary application-domain taxonomies, IEEE Software, July, 63, 10.1109/52.391837 · DOI
- Glass, 1995, A structure-based critique of contemporary computing research, Journal of Systems and Software, Jan
- Glass, 1994, The software-research crisis, IEEE Software, Nov
- Glass, 1992, A comparative analysis of the topic areas of computer science, software engineering, and information systems, Journal of Systems and Software, Nov, 277, 10.1016/0164-1212(92)90056-P · DOI
- Gregg, 2001, Understanding the philosophical underpinnings of software engineering research in information systems, Information Systems Frontiers, 3, 169, 10.1023/A:1011491322406 · DOI
- Hamilton, 1982, MIS research strategies, Information and Management, 5, 339, 10.1016/0378-7206(82)90033-7 · DOI
- Hamilton, 1982, Knowledge utilization among MIS researchers, MIS Quarterly, 6, 61, 10.2307/249067 · DOI
- Harrison, 2000, A meta-analysis of multidisciplinary research, In Papers from The Conference on Empirical Assessment in Software Engineering (EASE), 1
- Lai, 1997, Exploring the research in information technology implementation, Information and Management, 32, 187, 10.1016/S0378-7206(97)00022-0 · DOI
- Morrison, 1995, Exploring the software engineering component in MIS research, Communications of the ACM, 38, 80, 10.1145/213859.214802 · DOI
- Orlikowski, 1991, Studying information technology in organizations: research approaches and assumptions, Information Systems Research, 2, 1, 10.1287/isre.2.1.1 · DOI · Paper page
- Potts, 1993, Software engineering research revisited, IEEE Software, May
- Redwine, 1985, Software technology maturation, Proceedings of the 8th International Conference on Software Engineering, London, 189
- Shaw, 2001, The coming of age of software architecture research, Proceedings of the International Conference on Software Engineering, May
- Swanson, 1993, Information systems research thematics: submissions to a new journal, 1987–1992, Information Systems Research, 4, 299, 10.1287/isre.4.4.299 · DOI
- SWEBOK, Guide to the Software Engineering Body of Knowledge, sponsored and published by the ACM and IEEE Computer Society, ongoing (the official Version 1.0 is expected to be published in the 2002 time frame, but interim drafts are available before that).
- Tichy, 1992, Future directions in software engineering, summary of the Dagstuhl Workshop, ACM SIGSOFT Software Engineering Notes, Nov, 1993
- Tichy, 1995, Experimental evaluation in computer science: a quantitative study, Journal of Systems and Software, Jan
- Westin, 1994, Cross-fertilizations of knowledge: the case of MIS and its reference disciplines, Information Resources Management Journal, 7, 24, 10.4018/irmj.1994040103 · DOI
- Zelkowitz, 2002, Impediments to software engineering technology transfer, Journal of Systems and Software
- Zelkowitz, 1997, Experimental validation in software engineering, Information and Software Technology, 39, 735, 10.1016/S0950-5849(97)00025-6 · DOI
Cited by
Systematic Literature Reviews in Software Engineering—A Systematic Literature Review
Kitchenham, B., Pearl Brereton, O., Budgen, D., Turner, M., Bailey, J., & Linkman, S. (2009) · Information and Software Technology · doi:10.1016/j.infsof.2008.09.009 · Cited by 4,537
Systematic Mapping Studies in Software Engineering
Petersen, K., Feldt, R., Mujtaba, S., & Mattsson, M. (2008) · Electronic Workshops in Computing · doi:10.14236/ewic/ease2008.8 · Cited by 3,239
“Therefore, one review study (Sjøberg et al. 2005) applied the classification scheme proposed by Glass et al (Glass et al. 2002).”
Brereton, P., Kitchenham, B. A., Budgen, D., Turner, M., & Khalil, M. (2007) · Journal of Systems and Software · doi:10.1016/j.jss.2006.07.009 · Cited by 2,394
Systematic literature reviews in software engineering – A tertiary study
Kitchenham, B., Pretorius, R., Budgen, D., Pearl Brereton, O., Turner, M., Niazi, M., & Linkman, S. (2010) · Information and Software Technology · doi:10.1016/j.infsof.2010.03.006 · Cited by 1,230
Grounded theory in software engineering research: a critical review and guidelines
Stol, K.-J., Ralph, P., & Fitzgerald, B. (2016) · Proceedings of the 38th International Conference on Software Engineering · doi:10.1145/2884781.2884833 · Cited by 470
Metadata
- Authors
- Glass, R. L., Vessey, I., & Ramesh, V.
- Venue
- Information and Software Technology
- Publisher
- Elsevier BV
- Published
- 2002-06
- Volume
- 44
- Issue
- 8
- Pages
- 491-506
- ISSN
- 0950-5849 (ISSN-L)
- OpenAlex
- W2082372845
- Cited by
- 391
- References
- 2
- FWCI
- 41.89
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
- Licence
- www.elsevier.com/tdm/userlicense/1.0/ (tdm)
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.
