Cited by 346Software Engineering Techniques and PracticesAdvanced Software Engineering MethodologiesSafety Systems Engineering in Autonomy

Prospects for an engineering discipline of software

Open access
Shaw, M.·1990·IEEE Software

Abstract

Although software engineering is not yet a true engineering discipline, it has the potential to become one. Older engineering fields are examined to ascertain the character that software engineering might have. The current state of software technology is discussed, covering information processing as an economic force, the growing role of software in critical applications, the maturity of development techniques, and the scientific basis for software engineering practice. Five basic steps that the software engineering profession must take to become a true engineering discipline are described. They are: understanding the nature of expertise, recognizing different ways to get information, encouraging routine practice, expecting professional specializations, and improving the coupling between science and commercial practice.>

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1109/52.60586

Cites

20 of 20 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Research works printed but not linked: 3

  1. Edsger W. Dijkstra. On the Cruelty of Really Teaching Computing Science. Comm ACM, 32,12 (Dec 1989), pp.1398-1404.
  2. William A. Martin. Sorting. ACM Computing Surveys, 3,4 (Dec 1971), pp.147-174.
  3. Herbert A. Simon. Human Experts and Knowledge-Based Systems. Talk given at IFIP WG 10.1 Workshop on Concepts and Characteristics of Knowledge-Based Systems, Mt Fuji Japan, November 9-12, 1987.

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Shaw, M.
Affiliations
Carnegie Mellon University (US)
Corresponding author
Shaw, M.
Venue
IEEE Software
Published
1990-11
Volume
7
Issue
6
Pages
15-24
ISSN
  • 0740-7459 (ISSN-L)
  • 1937-4194
OpenAlex
W2122253789
Cited by
346
References
20
Citations by year
2026: 2 · 2025: 3 · 2024: 11 · 2023: 3 · 2022: 5 · 2021: 8 · 2020: 7 · 2019: 6 · 2018: 9 · 2017: 5 · 2016: 12 · 2015: 5 · 2014: 9 · 2013: 8 · 2012: 16
FWCI
39.50
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Locations
  • IEEE Software (publishedVersion)
  • Figshare (submittedVersion, cc-by)
  • KiltHub Repository (submittedVersion)
  • KiltHub Repository
Funders
  • U.S. Department of Defense
  • Defense Advanced Research Projects Agency
  • U.S. Air Force
  • Advanced Research Projects Agency
Topics
  • Physical Sciences › Computer Science › Information Systems › Software Engineering Techniques and Practices
  • Physical Sciences › Computer Science › Artificial Intelligence › Advanced Software Engineering Methodologies
  • Physical Sciences › Engineering › Safety, Risk, Reliability and Quality › Safety Systems Engineering in Autonomy
Keywords
software engineering profession, software development maturity, professional specialization, software engineering practices

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review