The DOI matches its Crossref record; 60 of the 60 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
Risk assessment, risk values and the social science programme: why we do need risk perception research
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cites
The Social Amplification of Risk: A Conceptual Framework
Kasperson, R. E., Renn, O., Slovic, P., Brown, H. S., Emel, J., Goble, R., Kasperson, J. X., & Ratick, S. (1988) · Risk Analysis · doi:10.1111/j.1539-6924.1988.tb01168.x · Cited by 2,740
Janis, I. L. (1972) · Cited by 2,382
Dumping in Dixie: Race, Class, and Environmental Quality.
Hamilton, L. C., & Bullard, R. D. (1991) · Social Forces · doi:10.2307/2580094 · Cited by 2,335
Perceived Risk, Trust, and Democracy
Slovic, P. (1993) · Risk Analysis · doi:10.1111/j.1539-6924.1993.tb01329.x · Cited by 1,870
The Challenger Launch Decision: Risky Technology, Culture, and Deviance at NASA.
Rosa, E. A., & Vaughan, D. (1997) · Social Forces · doi:10.2307/2580695 · Cited by 1,631
Dumping in Dixie: Race, Class and Environmental Quality.
Wade, B. H., & Bullard, R. D. (1991) · Contemporary Sociology · doi:10.2307/2076191 · Cited by 1,499
Understanding risk: informing decisions in a democratic society
(1997) · Choice Reviews Online · doi:10.5860/choice.34-5653 · Cited by 1,441
Five‐Hundred Life‐Saving Interventions and Their Cost‐Effectiveness
Tengs, T. O., Adams, M. E., Pliskin, J. S., Safran, D. G., Siegel, J. E., Weinstein, M. C., & Graham, J. D. (1995) · Risk Analysis · doi:10.1111/j.1539-6924.1995.tb00330.x · Cited by 1,321
Citizen Participation and Environmental Risk: A Survey of Institutional Mechanisms
Fiorino, D. J. (1990) · Science, Technology, & Human Values · doi:10.1177/016224399001500204 · Cited by 1,320
Facts and Fears: Understanding Perceived Risk
Slovic, P., Fischhoff, B., & Lichtenstein, S. (1980) · Societal Risk Assessment · doi:10.1007/978-1-4899-0445-4_9 · Cited by 1,188
Cited by
Public Views on Climate Change: European and USA Perspectives
Lorenzoni, I., & Pidgeon, N. F. (2006) · Climatic Change · doi:10.1007/s10584-006-9072-z · Cited by 1,047
Self-citationRisk perception research: socio-cultural perspectives on the public experience of air pollution
Bickerstaff, K. (2004) · Environment International · doi:10.1016/j.envint.2003.12.001 · Cited by 472
Factors influencing fire, earthquake, and cyclone risk perception in Yangon, Myanmar
Fernandez, G., Tun, A. M., Okazaki, K., Zaw, S. H., & Kyaw, K. (2018) · International Journal of Disaster Risk Reduction · doi:10.1016/j.ijdrr.2018.02.028 · Cited by 48
Metadata
- Authors
- Pidgeon, N.
- Venue
- Reliability Engineering & System Safety
- Publisher
- Elsevier BV
- Published
- 1998-01
- Volume
- 59
- Issue
- 1
- Pages
- 5-15
- ISSN
- 0951-8320 (ISSN-L)
- OpenAlex
- W2047690889
- Cited by
- 261
- References
- 60
- FWCI
- 5.74
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Risk assessment, risk values and the social science programme: why we do need risk perception research. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1016/s0951-8320(97)00114-2
- The paper
- Pidgeon, N. (1998). Risk assessment, risk values and the social science programme: why we do need risk perception research. Reliability Engineering & System Safety. https://doi.org/10.1016/s0951-8320(97)00114-2
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.
