Student or educator? Sign up with your school email and get 6 months of Pro free.
Cited by 315

The DOI matches its Crossref record; 1 of the 1 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.

Steps to take before intelligent user interfaces become real

Höök, K.·2000·Interacting with Computers

Abstract

Intelligent user interfaces have been proposed as a means to overcome some of the problems that directmanipulation interfaces cannot handle, such as: information overflow problems; providing help on how to use complex systems; or real-time cognitive overload problems. Intelligent user interfaces are also being proposed as a means to make systems individualised or personalised, thereby increasing the systems flexibility and appeal.

Overview

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1016/s0953-5438(99)00006-5

Cites

1 of 1 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Verification

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Citations

Cites

Research works printed but not linked: 30

  1. E. Horvitz, Agents with beliefs: Reflections on Bayesian methods for user modeling, Invited talk at 6th Inter. Conf. User Modeling, Chia Laguna, Sardinia, 2–5 June 1997. · DOI
  2. K. Höök, 1996 A Glass Box Approach to Adaptive Hypermedia, Ph.D. Thesis, SICS Dissertation Series 23, ISBN: 91-7153-510-1, Stockholm, Sweden. · DOI
  3. K. Höök, J. Karlgren, A. Waern, N. Dahlbäck, C-G. Jansson,, K. Karlgren, B. Lemaire, A glass box approach to adaptive hypermedia, J. User Modeling User-Adaptive Interaction UMUAI 6. · DOI
  4. du Boulay, 1981, The black box inside the glass box: presenting computing concepts to novices, Inter. J. Man–Machine Stud., JMMS-14, 237, 10.1016/S0020-7373(81)80056-9 · DOI · Paper page
  5. R. Cook, J. Kay, The justified user model: a viewable, explained user model, Proceedings of 4th Inter. Conf. User Modeling, Hyannis, Mass. The Mitre Corp., 1994.
  6. T. Kühme, U. Malinowski, J.D. Foley, Adaptive Prompting, Technical Report GIT-GVU-93-05, Georgia Institute of Technology, 1993. · DOI
  7. H. Lieberman, Letizia: An agent that assists web browsing, Proc. Int. Joint Conf. Artificial Intelligence, Montreal, 1995.
  8. J. Orwant, Appraising the User of User Models: Doppelgänger’s interface, in: A. Kobsa and D. Litman (eds.), Proc. 4th Int. Conf. User Modeling, Hyannis, Massachusetts, Mitre Corp., 1994, pp. 73–78.
  9. Maes, 1995, Intelligent software: programs that can act independently will ease the burdens that computers put on people, Sci. Amer., 273, 84
  10. S.E. Brennan, J.O. Ohaeri, Effects of Message Style on Users’ Attributions toward Agents, Conference Companion, CHI’94, Boston, 1994. · DOI
  11. W.J. King, J. Ohya, The representation of agents: a study of phenomena in virtual environments, Proc. 4th IEEE Int. Workshop on Robot and Human Commun., RO-MAN’95, Tokyo, Japan, 1995. · DOI
  12. T. Koda, P. Maes, Agents with Faces: The Effects of Personification of Agents, Proceedings of HCI’96, London, UK, 1996.
  13. CACM, Recommender systems, Communications of ACM 40 (3), 1997. · DOI · Paper page
  14. K. Höök, Å. Rudström, A. Waern, Edited Adaptive Hypermedia: Combining Human and Machine Intelligence to Achieve Filtered Information, presented at the Flexible Hypermedia workshop held in conjunction with the Hypertext conference, Southampton, 1997.
  15. P. Maes, Direct Manipulation vs. Interface Agents, Position statement, Proceedings of 1997 International Conference on Intelligent User Interfaces, (eds.) Johanna Moore, Ernest Edmonds, and Angel Puerta, ACM, Orlando, Florida, 1997.
  16. C. Clanton, An Interpreted Demonstration of Computer Game Design, HCI Lessons from Games, Demonstation at Computer-Human Interaction, CHI’98, Los Angeles, 1998. · doi:10.1145/286498.286499
  17. J. Breuker (Ed.), EUROHELP: Developing Intelligent Help Systems, EC, Report on P280 ESPRIT Project EUROHELP, 1990.
  18. Benyon, 1993, Adaptive systems: A solution to usability problems, J. User Modelling and User-Adapted Interaction, 3, 1
  19. Rich, 1979, User modeling via stereotypes, Cognitive Sci., 3, 329, 10.1207/s15516709cog0304_3 · doi:10.1207/s15516709cog0304_3 · Paper page
  20. Opperman, 1994, Adaptively supported adaptability, Int. J. Human-Computer Studies, 40, 455, 10.1006/ijhc.1994.1021 · DOI
  21. K. Höök, M. Sjölinder, N. Dahlbäck, Individual differences and navigation in hypermedia, European Conference on Cognitive Ergonomics, ECCE-8, Granada, Spain, September, 1996a.
  22. K. Sparck-Jones, Tailoring the output to the user: what does user modelling in generation mean? in: Natural Language Generation in Artificial Intelligence and Computational Linguistics, Dordrecht, Netherlands: Kluwer Academic, 1991. · DOI
  23. J.A. Self, Bypassing the Intractable Problem of Student Modelling, Proceedings. of the Conference on Intelligent Tutoring Systems ITS-88, 1988, pp. 107–123.
  24. J. Kay, Lies, damned lies, and stereotypes: pragmatic approximations of users, in: A. Kobsa and D. Litman (Eds.), Proc. 4th Int. Conf. User Modeling, Hyannis, Massachusetts, Mitre Corp., 1994, pp. 73–78.
  25. A. Wærn, Recognising Human Plans: Issues for Plan Recognition in Human-Computer Interaction, Ph.D. Thesis, ISBN 91-7153-456-3, SICS Dissertation Series 20, Stockholm, Sweden, 1996.
  26. Boyle, 1994, MetaDoc: An adaptive hypertext reading system, J. User Models and User Adapted Interaction, 4, 1, 10.1007/BF01142355 · DOI
  27. P. Brusilovsky, L. Pesin, ISIS-Tutor: An adaptive hypertext learning environment, in: H. Ueono & V. Stefanuk (eds.), Proceedings of JCKBSE’94, Japanese-CIS Symposium on knowledge-based software engineering, Tokyo: EIC.
  28. Kaplan, 1993, Adaptive hypertext navigation based on user goals and context, J. User Modeling and User-Adapted Interaction, 3, 193, 10.1007/BF01257889 · DOI
  29. B. Meyer, Adaptive Performance Support: User Acceptance of a Self-Adapting System, 4th Int. Conf. UM Hyannis, MA, 1994.
  30. Schank, 1991, Where’s the AI?, AI Magazine, 12, 38

Cited by

See all 315

Metadata

Authors
Höök, K.
Venue
Interacting with Computers
Published
2000-02
Volume
12
Issue
4
Pages
409-426
ISSN
0953-5438 (ISSN-L)
OpenAlex
W1965240572
Cited by
315
References
1
FWCI
12.57
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review

Data sources

Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.

Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).

Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.