The DOI matches its Crossref record; 54 of the 54 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
Socio-economic futures in climate change impact assessment: using scenarios as ‘learning machines’
Open accessAbstract
Climate impact assessment needs to take account of two interrelated processes: socio-economic change and climate change. To date, future change in socio-economic systems has not been sufficiently integrated with an analysis of climate change impacts. Participative and synthetic scenario approaches offer a means for dealing with critical issues of indeterminacy, innovation, reflexivity and framing in analysing change in socio-economic systems, paving the way for a coherent way of handling of socio-economic futures in impact assessment. We argue that scenarios represent heuristic tools that encourage social learning in climate impact assessment. The advantages and disadvantages of a scenario-based approach are explored using examples from regional climate impact assessment in the UK.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cites
Situated Learning: Legitimate Peripheral Participation.
Bloch, M., Lave, J., & Wenger, E. (1994) · Man · doi:10.2307/2804509 · Cited by 39,454
Institutions, Institutional Change and Economic Performance
Munger, M. C., & North, D. C. (1991) · Southern Economic Journal · doi:10.2307/1060065 · Cited by 24,871
An Evolutionary Theory of Economic Change.
Loasby, B. J., Nelson, R. R., & Winter, S. G. (1983) · The Economic Journal · doi:10.2307/2232409 · Cited by 21,366
(1984) · Cited by 21,166
The fifth discipline, the art and practice of the learning organization
Senge, P. M. (1991) · Performance + Instruction · doi:10.1002/pfi.4170300510 · Cited by 20,060
Situated Cognition and the Culture of Learning
Brown, J. S., Collins, A., & Duguid, P. (1989) · Educational Researcher · doi:10.3102/0013189x018001032 · Cited by 13,645
Organizational Learning: A Theory of Action Perspective
Argyris, C., & Schön, D. A. (1997) · Reis · doi:10.2307/40183951 · Cited by 11,113
Brown, J. S., & Duguid, P. (1991) · Organization Science · doi:10.1287/orsc.2.1.40 · Cited by 8,390
Laboratory Life: The Construction of Scientific Facts
Latour, B. (1986) · DigitalGeorgetown (Georgetown University Library) · Cited by 7,491
Special report on emissions scenarios
Nakićenović, N., Alcamo, J., Davis, G. R., de Vries, B. J. M., Fenhann, J. V., Gaffin, S., Gregory, K., Grübler, A., Jung, T. Y., Kram, T., et al. (2000) · Cited by 6,085
Cited by
Understanding adaptation: What can social capital offer assessments of adaptive capacity?
Pelling, M., & High, C. (2005) · Global Environmental Change · doi:10.1016/j.gloenvcha.2005.02.001 · Cited by 938
Conceptual elements of climate change vulnerability assessments: a review
Bruno Soares, M., S. Gagnon, A., & M. Doherty, R. (2012) · International Journal of Climate Change Strategies and Management · doi:10.1108/17568691211200191 · Cited by 110
Nierop, S. C. A. (2014) · Environmental Science & Policy · doi:10.1016/j.envsci.2014.04.011 · Cited by 27
Metadata
- Authors
- BERKHOUT, F., HERTIN, J., & JORDAN, A.
- Venue
- Global Environmental Change
- Publisher
- Elsevier BV
- Published
- 2002-07
- Volume
- 12
- Issue
- 2
- Pages
- 83-95
- ISSN
- 0959-3780 (ISSN-L)
- OpenAlex
- W2141175749
- Cited by
- 406
- References
- 54
- FWCI
- 13.63
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- green
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Socio-economic futures in climate change impact assessment: using scenarios as ‘learning machines’. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1016/s0959-3780(02)00006-7
- The paper
- BERKHOUT, F., HERTIN, J., & JORDAN, A. (2002). Socio-economic futures in climate change impact assessment: using scenarios as ‘learning machines’. Global Environmental Change. https://doi.org/10.1016/s0959-3780(02)00006-7
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.
