Cited by 108

The Otx family

Simeone, Antonio, Puelles, Eduardo, Acampora, Dario·2002·Current Opinion in Genetics & Development

Abstract

Otx1 and Otx2, the murine homologs of the Drosophila orthodenticle gene, play a remarkable role in specification and regionalization of forebrain and midbrain. Recently, genetic approaches have indicated that OTD, OTX1 and OTX2 have retained reciprocal functional equivalence in evolution, whereas their regulatory control has been remarkably modified. This suggests that during the evolution of the vertebrate brain, regulatory changes modulating the transcriptional and translational control of pre-existing gene functions might have favored the establishment of new morphogenetic pathways.

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1016/s0959-437x(02)00318-0

Cites

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

This paper’s full text isn’t openly available, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • Otx1 is necessary for normal corticogenesis.

    “Otx1, murine homolog of the Drosophila transcription factor orthodenticle, is necessary for normal corticogenesis (Simeone et al. 2002), and may represent another putative target for miR-103.”

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Simeone, A., Puelles, E., & Acampora, D.
Venue
Current Opinion in Genetics & Development
Publisher
Elsevier BV
Published
2002-08
Volume
12
Issue
4
Pages
409-415
ISSN
0959-437X
Cited by
108
References
0
Language
en

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review