Cited by 1,040MicroRNA in disease regulationPlant Molecular Biology ResearchDevelopmental Biology and Gene Regulation

A microRNA array reveals extensive regulation of microRNAs during brain development

Open access
KRICHEVSKY, ANNA M., KING, KEVIN S., DONAHUE, CHRISTINE P., KHRAPKO, KONSTANTIN, KOSIK, KENNETH S.·2003·RNA

Abstract

Several hundred microRNAs (miRNAs) have recently been cloned from a wide range of organisms across phylogeny. Despite the high degree of conservation of miRNAs, their functions in general, and in mammals particularly, are just beginning to be defined. Here we show that an oligonucleotide DNA array can be successfully used for the simultaneous analysis of miRNA expression profiles from tissues or cells. From a subset of miRNAs expressed in the brain we designed an oligonucleotide array spotted with probes specific for 44 mature miRNAs. These arrays demonstrated precise regulation of miRNA expression at mammalian brain developmental epochs. About 20% of the probed miRNAs changed significantly in their expression during normal brain development, and two of them, miR-9 and miR-131, were dysregulated in presenilin-1 null mice exhibiting severe brain developmental defects. Transcripts with regulated expression patterns on the arrays were validated by Northern blots. Additionally, a bioinformatic analysis of developmentally regulated miRNAs suggested potential mRNA targets. The arrays also revealed miRNAs distributed to translating polyribosomes in primary neurons where they are likely to modulate translation. Therefore, oligonucleotide arrays provide a new tool for studying miRNA expression in a variety of biological and pathobiological settings. Creating clusters of coexpressed miRNAs will contribute to understanding their regulation, functions, and discovery of mRNA targets.

AI snapshot

Written from the paper’s full text.

TL;DR

An oligonucleotide array for 44 mature microRNAs revealed that miRNA expression is extensively and precisely regulated across rat brain development, with about 20% of probed miRNAs changing significantly. The array also detected dysregulation of miR-9 and miR-131 in presenilin-1 null mice and differential miRNA association with translating polyribosomes in primary neurons.

Key findings

  • Nine candidate miRNAs were differentially expressed during rat forebrain development with more than a twofold change (p < 0.05); Northern blots validated all nine. Examples include miR-131 increasing 4.2-fold from E12 to E13 and 4.7-fold from E13 to E21, miR-124a increasing more than 13-fold from E12 to E21, and miR-128 increasing 12-fold from E12 to adult.
  • In E17.5 PS1-deficient mouse forebrains, miR-9 and miR-131 were reduced more than twofold compared with PS1(+/-) littermates; the difference was less evident at E13.5 and enhanced over development. No differences in other miRNAs were detected in PS1-deficient mice.
  • miRNAs cosedimented with translating polyribosomes in primary cerebrocortical neurons; miR-9 was more associated with polyribosomes than miR-131 (20%–25% of miR-9 versus 8%–9% of miR-131).
  • Bioinformatic analysis suggested putative mRNA targets, including calcineurin A beta for miR-131 (19 nt of 21 in human, 18 nt of 21 in rodent complementarity), Id2 for miR-9 (20 nt of 23), and SMBP2 and Otx1 for miR-103.

Methods

  • A nylon-membrane oligonucleotide array was spotted with antisense probes for 44 mature miRNAs (54–72 nt tri-mers at 7 µM), plus mismatch controls. Low-molecular-weight RNA (<70 nt) from rat forebrain at E12, E13, E21, P5, and adult stages, PS1 mouse forebrains, and cultured primary cerebrocortical neurons was labeled and hybridized.
  • Hybridization signals were quantified by phosphorimaging; typically three independent RNA samples per developmental time point were used, with duplicate or triplicate hybridizations, normalization, and two-tailed t-tests for developmental comparisons. Northern blots validated regulated miRNAs.
  • For polyribosome studies, cytosolic lysates from primary neurons were fractionated on 15%–45% sucrose gradients into mRNP, ribosomal subunit/free ribosome, polyribosome, and RNA granule fractions; RNA from fractions was analyzed by array and Northern blot. Bioinformatic FASTA/BLAST searches identified mRNAs with complementarity to regulated miRNAs.

Limitations

  • The paper does not include a dedicated limitations section.
  • Evident from the text: the array covered only 44 selected miRNAs, so it could not survey all vertebrate miRNAs; putative mRNA targets were identified bioinformatically and were not experimentally validated.
  • The erratum revises miRNA nomenclature and notes that miR-271 does not fulfill stringent miRNA criteria and was deleted from the array list; some PS1 array data are described as “data not shown.”

Model-written summary. Check it against the paper before relying on it.

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1261/rna.5980303

Cites

34 of 34 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Nothing to recompute.

Claims the paper makes

0 of 36 cited sources checked · 0 supported · 0 flagged

Verify all 11 references — free account
  • Findingown data

    miR-9 and miR-131 were dysregulated in presenilin-1 null mice exhibiting severe brain developmental defects.

    “two of them, miR-9 and miR-131, were dysregulated in presenilin-1 null mice exhibiting severe brain developmental defects.”
    Quote in the paperSubstantial claim
  • Findingown data

    MiR-128 signal enhanced later in corticogenesis with an overall 12-fold increase between E12 and adult.

    “MiR-128 signal enhanced later in corticogenesis with an overall 12-fold increase between E12 and adult.”
    Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim
  • Findingown data

    Expression of miR-9 and miR-131 was reduced in the forebrains of E17.5 PS1-deficient mice compared to their PS1(+/-) littermate forebrains.

    “These experiments demonstrated that expression of the developmentally regulated pair, miR-9 and miR-131, was reduced in the forebrains of E17.5 PS1-deficient mice compared to their PS1(+/-) littermate forebrains (data not shown).”
    Quote in the paperSubstantial claim
  • Findingown data

    Combining the candidate strategy with a search of the NCBI databases revealed several messages with a high degree of complementarity to developmentally regulated neuronal miRNAs.

    “Combining this candidate strategy with a search of the NCBI databases revealed several messages with a high degree of complementarity to developmentally regulated neuronal miRNAs (Fig. 6).”
    Quote in the paperSubstantial claim
  • Findingown data

    Specific miRNA expressions are dysregulated in mice that lack presenilin.

    “We show here that specific miRNA expressions are precisely regulated during brain development and dysregulated in mice that lack presenilin.”
    Quote in the paperSubstantial claim
  • May combine two claims. 29
  • Classified as probably not a substantial claim. 41
  • May combine two claims.

    Findingown data

    MiR-19b signal was strong in E12 and E13, but nearly undetectable in the adult.

    “MiR-19b signal was strong in E12 and E13, but nearly undetectable in the adult.”
    Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim
  • May combine two claims.

    Findingown data

    Two different precursors of ∼65 nt, pre-mir9/131-ch1 and pre-mir9/131-ch15, but not pre-mir9/131-ch5, are detected with probes specific for the loop regions.

    “Two different precursors of ∼65 nt, pre-mir9/131-ch1 and pre-mir9/131-ch15, but not pre-mir9/131-ch5, are detected with probes specific for the loop regions (Fig. 3C).”
    Quote in the paperSubstantial claim
  • May combine two claims.

    Findingown data

    Some miRNAs were overrepresented in polysomes, whereas others were underrepresented.

    “Some miRNAs were overrepresented in polysomes, whereas others are underrepresented.”
    Quote in the paperSubstantial claim
  • May combine two claims.

    Findingown data

    The difference in miR-9 and miR-131 expression between PS1(+/-) and PS1(-/-) brains was less evident at E13.5 and enhanced over development from E13.5 to E17.5.

    “The difference in miR-9 and miR-131 expression between PS1(+/-) and PS1(-/-) brains was less evident at E13.5 and enhanced over development from E13.5 to E17.5.”
    Quote in the paperSubstantial claim
  • May combine two claims.

    Findingown data

    miR-9 and miR-131 are brain-enriched transcripts processed from both arms of the stem of a ∼65 nt common precursor.

    “Two of these miRNAs, miR-9 and miR-131, are brain-enriched transcripts (Fig. 3A) processed from both arms of the stem of a ∼65 nt common precursor (Fig. 3B).”
    Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim
  • May combine two claims.

    Findingown data

    Both miR-9/miR-131 precursors are more abundant at E14-E15 than at E21.

    “Although miR-9 and miR-131 expression patterns demonstrate their maximal level at E21, both precursors are more abundant at E14-E15, suggesting developmental regulation of their maturation.”
    Quote in the paperSubstantial claim
  • May combine two claims.

    Findingreasoning

    After E21, the miR-131 signal decreased, and in adults it appeared just 3.4-fold higher than at E12.

    “After E21, the miR-131 signal decreased, and therefore in adults it appeared just 3.4-fold higher than at E12.”
    Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim
  • May combine two claims.

    Findingown data

    At all three loci the sequences of miR-9 and miR-131 are perfectly conserved, whereas their joining sequences are just moderately conserved at two loci and differ strongly at a chromosome 15 locus.

    “At all three loci the sequences of miR-9 and miR-131 are perfectly conserved, whereas their joining sequences are just moderately conserved at two loci (chromosomes 1 and 5), and differ strongly at a chromosome 15 locus (Fig. 3B).”
    Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim
  • May combine two claims.

    Findingown data

    The expression patterns of the nine miRNAs fell into categories including postnatal expression, prenatal expression, peak expression at E21, increasing during the embryonic period followed by stable postnatal expression, and gradually increasing expression.

    “The expression patterns fell into four categories: (1) postnatal expression, for example, miR-128; (2) prenatal expression, for example, miR-19b; (3) peak expression at E21, for example, miR-9, miR-125b, miR-131, miR-178; (4) increasing during the embryonic period followed by stable expression in the postnatal period, for example, miR-124a and miR-266; (5) gradually increasing expression, for exam”
    Quote in the paperSubstantial claim
  • May combine two claims.

    Findingown data

    Overall, a stronger signal was observed in the mRNPs; however, the proportion of specific miRNAs in polysomes versus mRNPs differed widely.

    “Overall, a stronger signal was observed in the mRNPs; however, the proportion of specific miRNAs in polysomes versus mRNPs differed widely.”
    Quote in the paperSubstantial claim
  • May combine two claims.

    Findingown data

    MiR-124a signal increased more than 13-fold from E12 to E21, after which it remained stable.

    “MiR-124a signal increased more than 13-fold from E12 to E21, after which it remained stable.”
    Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim
  • May combine two claims.

    Findingown data

    The average increase in the miR-131 signal from E12 to E13 was 4.2-fold, and 4.7 from E13 to E21.

    “For example, the average increase in the miR-131 signal from E12 to E13 was 4.2-fold, and 4.7 from E13 to E21.”
    Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim
  • Probably not a substantial claim: may not pass S3 (load-bearing).

    Findingown data

    tRNAs comigrate with a synthetic marker of 65 nt.

    “tRNAs here comigrate with a synthetic marker of 65 nt.”
    Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim
  • Probably not a substantial claim: may not pass S3 (load-bearing), S4 (based).

    Findingnone given

    A sequence within DNA helicase SMBP2 transcript is nearly complementary to miR-103.

    “A sequence within DNA helicase SMBP2 transcript is nearly complementary to miR-103.”
    Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim
  • Probably not a substantial claim: may not pass S3 (load-bearing). May combine two claims.

    Findingown data

    In addition to miR-124a, its precursor is detected in lanes 4 and 5, but not in lane 6.

    “In addition to miR-124a, its precursor is detected in lanes 4 and 5, but not in a lane 6.”
    Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim
  • May combine two claims.

    Findingown data

    MiR-9 and miR-131 are disregulated in PS1 null mice.

    “MiR-9 and miR-131 are disregulated in PS1 null mice.”
    Quote in the paperSubstantial claim
    • Rests on an assumption: PS1(+/-) heterozygous mice are phenotypically indistinguishable from wild-type animals.
  • Probably not a substantial claim: may not pass S3 (load-bearing).

    Findingown data

    miR-271 is expressed in brain as detected by Northern blot analysis.

    “Although this molecule is expressed in brain as detected by Northern blot analysis, it may represent a different class of non-coding RNA and, therefore, was deleted from the list of miRNAs included on the array.”
    Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim
  • Probably not a substantial claim: may not pass S3 (load-bearing). May combine two claims.

    Findingown data

    The low-molecular-weight RNA fraction allowed detection of several highly expressed pre-miRNAs and two tRNAs spotted as controls.

    “Nevertheless, we were able to detect several highly expressed pre-miRNA, as well as two tRNAs, which were spotted as controls.”
    Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim
  • Probably not a substantial claim: may not pass S3 (load-bearing).

    Interpretationown data

    The greater reduction in miR-9 compared to miR-131 possibly indicates a difference in their stability or processing.

    “possibly indicating a difference in their stability or processing.”
    Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim
  • Probably not a substantial claim: may not pass S3 (load-bearing).

    Premisecitation

    Inactivation of C. elegans Dicer (dcr-1) causes heterochronic phenotypes similar to let-7 and lin-4 mutations.

    “Inactivation of C. elegans Dicer (dcr-1) causes heterochronic phenotypes similar to let-7 and lin-4 mutations (Grishok et al. 2001).”
    Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim0 of 1 sources checked
    • cites Grishok et al. 2001 source
  • Probably not a substantial claim: may not pass S3 (load-bearing).

    Premisecitation

    Two C. elegans miRNAs, lin-4 and let-7, control developmental timing by forming imperfect base pairing with elements within the 3' UTR of target mRNAs and attenuating their translation.

    “Two C. elegans miRNAs, lin-4 and let-7, control developmental timing by forming imperfect base pairing with elements within the 3Ј UTR of target mRNAs and attenuating their translation (Lee et al. 1993;Wightman et al. 1993;Olsen and Ambros 1999;Reinhart et al. 2000;Slack et al. 2000).”
    Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim0 of 3 sources checked
    • cites Lee et al. 1993 source
    • cites Wightman et al. 1993 source
    • cites Olsen and Ambros 1999 source
  • Probably not a substantial claim: may not pass S3 (load-bearing).

    Premisecitation

    In Arabidopsis, suppression of RNA silencing, which shares a common pathway with miRNA processing, results in developmental defects.

    “In Arabidopsis, suppression of RNA silencing, which shares a common pathway with miRNA processing, results in developmental defects (Kasschau et al. 2003).”
    Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim0 of 1 sources checked
    • cites Kasschau et al. 2003 source
  • Probably not a substantial claim: may not pass S3 (load-bearing).

    Premisecitation

    Many miRNAs, often with highly conserved sequences, are present in the genomes of C. elegans, Drosophila, mice, and humans.

    “Many miRNAs, often with highly conserved sequences, are present in the genomes of Caenorhabditis elegans, Drosophila, mice, and humans (Lagos-Quintana et al. 2001, 2002;Lau et al. 2001;Lee and Ambros 2001;Mourelatos et al. 2002;Dostie et al. 2003).”
    Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim0 of 3 sources checked
    • cites Lagos-Quintana et al. 2001, 2002

      Couldn’t be matched to a paper in Crossref, so it can’t be checked.

    • cites Lau et al. 2001 source
    • cites Lee and Ambros 2001 source
  • Probably not a substantial claim: may not pass S3 (load-bearing). May combine two claims.

    Premisecitation

    In plants, miRNAs have greater complementarity to their mRNA targets and are likely to trigger degradation of their targets similarly to small interfering RNAs.

    “In plants, miRNAs have greater complementarity to their mRNA targets, and are likely to trigger the degradation of their targets similarly to the action of small interfering RNAs (siRNAs; Llave et al. 2002;Rhoades et al. 2002).”
    Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim0 of 2 sources checked
    • cites Llave et al. 2002 source
    • cites Rhoades et al. 2002

      Couldn’t be matched to a paper in Crossref, so it can’t be checked.

  • Probably not a substantial claim: may not pass S3 (load-bearing).

    Premisecitation

    miR-9 is also down-regulated during development of the fly, the organism from which it was initially cloned.

    “Interestingly, miR-9 is also down-regulated during development of the fly, the organism from which it was initially cloned (Lagos-Quintana et al. 2001).”
    Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim0 of 1 sources checked
    • cites Lagos-Quintana et al. 2001 source
  • Probably not a substantial claim: may not pass S3 (load-bearing), S4 (based).

    Interpretationnone given

    The failure of miR-9 and miR-131 to up-regulate in PS1(-/-) embryonic brain development may be due to impaired Notch signaling.

    “The failure of miR-9 and miR-131 to up-regulate in PS1(-/-) embryonic brain development may be due to impaired Notch signaling.”
    Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim
  • Classified as probably not a substantial claim.

    Premisecitation

    Premature neuronal differentiation in the PS1(-/-) brain is associated with aberrant neuronal migration and disorganization of the laminar architecture of the developing cerebral hemisphere.

    “Premature neuronal differentiation in the PS1(-/-) brain is associated with aberrant neuronal migration and disorganization of the laminar architecture of the developing cerebral hemisphere (Handler et al. 2000).”
    Quote in the paperSubstantial claim0 of 1 sources checked
    • cites Handler et al. 2000 source
  • May combine two claims.

    Interpretationown data

    These precursors' expression can be independently regulated during brain development, and it is possible that only one member of the pair is expressed from each locus.

    “Therefore, these precursors expression can be independently regulated during brain development, and it is possible that only one member of the pair is expressed from each locus.”
    Quote in the paperSubstantial claim
  • Probably not a substantial claim: may not pass S3 (load-bearing). May combine two claims.

    Premisecitation

    miRNA expression is regulated as a function of time course in neuronal cultures, and several miRNAs have been observed in association with polyribosomes in primary neurons.

    “miRNA expression is regulated as a function of time course in neuronal cultures and several miRNAs have been observed in association with polyribosomes in primary neurons (J.Kim, A.M. Krichevsky, Y. Grad, G.D. Hayes, K.S. Kosik, G.M. Church, and G. Ruvkun, in prep.).”
    Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim0 of 1 sources checked
    • cites J.Kim, A.M. Krichevsky, Y. Grad, G.D. Hayes, K.S. Kosik, G.M. Church, and G. Ruvkun, in prep.

      Couldn’t be matched to a paper in Crossref, so it can’t be checked.

  • Probably not a substantial claim: may not pass S3 (load-bearing).

    Premisecitation

    In Drosophila, bantam miRNA stimulates cell proliferation and tissue growth.

    “In Drosophila, bantam miRNA stimulates cell proliferation and tissue growth (Brennecke et al. 2003).”
    Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim0 of 1 sources checked
    • cites Brennecke et al. 2003 source
  • May combine two claims.

    Premisecitation

    The lack of PS1 leads to premature differentiation of neural progenitor cells, while neural proliferation and apoptotic cell death during neurogenesis are unaltered.

    “Here, the lack of PS1 leads to premature differentiation of neural progenitor cells, while neural proliferation and apoptotic cell death during neurogenesis are unaltered (Handler et al. 2000).”
    Quote in the paperSubstantial claim0 of 1 sources checked
    • cites Handler et al. 2000 source
  • Probably not a substantial claim: may not pass S3 (load-bearing). May combine two claims.

    Premisecitation

    The Drosophila homolog of FMRP associates with Dicer and with miRNAs and colocalizes with translating ribosomes.

    “Drosophila homolog of this protein associates with Dicer and with miRNAs and colocalizes with translating ribosomes (Caudy et al. 2002).”
    Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim0 of 1 sources checked
    • cites Caudy et al. 2002

      Couldn’t be matched to a paper in Crossref, so it can’t be checked.

  • Probably not a substantial claim: may not pass S3 (load-bearing).

    Premisecitation

    Some miRNAs are organized in the genome as clusters sometimes separated by intervals as short as a few nucleotides.

    “Some miRNAs are organized in the genome as clusters sometimes separated by intervals as short as a few nucleotides (Lagos-Quintana et al. 2001;Lau et al. 2001).”
    Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim0 of 2 sources checked
    • cites Lagos-Quintana et al. 2001 source
    • cites Lau et al. 2001 source
  • Probably not a substantial claim: may not pass S3 (load-bearing).

    Premisecitation

    The enzyme responsible for cleavage of miRNA hairpin precursors is Dicer.

    “The enzyme responsible for this cleavage is Dicer (Hutvagner et al. 2001;Ketting et al. 2001).”
    Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim0 of 2 sources checked
    • cites Hutvagner et al. 2001 source
    • cites Ketting et al. 2001 source
  • Classified as probably not a substantial claim. May combine two claims.

    Premisecitation

    In C. elegans both lin-4 miRNA and its target lin-14 mRNA associate with polyribosomes and lin-4 inhibits the translation of lin-14 mRNA after initiation of its translation.

    “In C. elegans both lin-4 miRNA and its target lin-14 mRNA associate with polyribosomes and lin-4 inhibits the translation of lin-14 mRNA after initiation of its translation (Ambros 2000).”
    Quote in the paperSubstantial claim0 of 1 sources checked
    • cites Ambros 2000 source
  • Classified as probably not a substantial claim. May combine two claims.

    Premisecitation

    Heterochronic RNAs in C. elegans control cell cycle progression and a particular sequence of cell divisions that is necessary for the generation of a specific cell type.

    “Heterochronic RNAs in C. elegans control cell cycle progression and a particular sequence of cell divisions that is necessary for the generation of a specific cell type (Ambros 2000).”
    Quote in the paperSubstantial claim0 of 1 sources checked
    • cites Ambros 2000 source
  • Probably not a substantial claim: may not pass S3 (load-bearing).

    Premisecitation

    The SMN protein is part of a large ribonucleoprotein complex that contains numerous miRNAs.

    “This protein is part of a large ribonucleoprotein complex that contains numerous miRNAs (Mourelatos et al. 2002).”
    Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim0 of 1 sources checked
    • cites Mourelatos et al. 2002 source
  • Probably not a substantial claim: may not pass S3 (load-bearing). May combine two claims.

    Premisecitation

    Many miRNAs have been isolated from mammalian embryonic neurons and mature brain, and some of them are neuronal-specific.

    “Many miRNAs have been isolated from mammalian embryonic neurons and mature brain, and some of them are neuronalspecific (Lagos-Quintana et al. 2002;Dostie et al. 2003).”
    Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim0 of 2 sources checked
    • cites Lagos-Quintana et al. 2002 source
    • cites Dostie et al. 2003 source
  • Probably not a substantial claim: may not pass S3 (load-bearing).

    Study design and conductnone given

    Samples with abnormally low incorporation were excluded from the analysis.

    “Samples with abnormally low incorporation were excluded from the analysis.”
    Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim
  • Probably not a substantial claim: may not pass S3 (load-bearing).

    Premisecitation

    The estimated number of total miRNAs in vertebrates is ∼250 molecules.

    “The estimated number of the total miRNAs in vertebrates is ∼250 molecules (Lim et al. 2003).”
    Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim0 of 1 sources checked
    • cites Lim et al. 2003 source
  • May combine two claims.

    Interpretationcitation

    The mentioned mRNAs encode either transcription factors or, like calcineurin, may affect transcription indirectly.

    “Similar to the majority of the predicted plant targets (Rhoades et al. 2002), the mentioned mRNAs encode either transcription factors or, like calcineurin, may affect transcription indirectly.”
    Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim0 of 1 sources checked
    • cites Rhoades et al. 2002

      Couldn’t be matched to a paper in Crossref, so it can’t be checked.

  • Probably not a substantial claim: may not pass S3 (load-bearing).

    Study design and conductnone given

    Expression ratios are shown only where the ratio exceeds twofold and the corresponding p-value is equal to or below 0.05.

    “Expression ratios are shown only where the ratio exceeds twofold and the corresponding p-value is equal or below 0.05.”
    Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim
  • Probably not a substantial claim: may not pass S3 (load-bearing).

    Premisecitation

    Calcineurin A, and particularly its ␤ isoform expression in developing brain, is regulated posttranscriptionally, most likely at the translational level.

    “Calcineurin A, and particularly its ␤ isoform expression in developing brain is regulated posttranscriptionally, most likely at the translational level (Polli et al. 1991).”
    Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim0 of 1 sources checked
    • cites Polli et al. 1991 source
  • Classified as probably not a substantial claim.

    Study design and conductnone given

    Hybridization signals that failed to exceed the average background value by more than three standard deviations were excluded from analysis.

    “Hybridization signals that failed to exceed the average background value by more than three standard deviations were excluded from analysis.”
    Quote in the paperSubstantial claim
  • Classified as probably not a substantial claim. May combine two claims.

    Study design and conductown data

    mRNP and polysomal RNAs were isolated from three independent fractionation experiments, and each LMW RNA sample was hybridized in triplicate to the array membranes.

    “mRNP and polysomal RNAs were isolated from three independent fractionation experiments, and each LMW RNA sample was hybridized in triplicate to the array membranes as shown in A.”
    Quote in the paperSubstantial claim
  • Classified as probably not a substantial claim.

    Study design and conductown data

    The bars represent an average of three completely independent experiments.

    “The bars represent an average of three completely independent experiments.”
    Quote in the paperSubstantial claim
  • Probably not a substantial claim: may not pass S3 (load-bearing). May combine two claims.

    Study design and conductown data

    The standard deviation between triplicate samples was <0.6 for all probes, <0.3 for 80% of probes, and <0.2 for 50% of probes.

    “The standard deviation between triplicate samples was distributed as follows: <0.6 for all probes, <0.3 for 80% of probes, and <0.2 for 50% of probes.”
    Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim
  • Probably not a substantial claim: may not pass S3 (load-bearing).

    Study design and conductnone given

    Typically, an experiment included three independent RNA samples for each developmental time point.

    “Typically, an experiment included three independent RNA samples for each developmental time point.”
    Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim
  • Probably not a substantial claim: may not pass S3 (load-bearing), S4 (based).

    Interpretationnone given

    Otx1 may represent another putative target for miR-103.

    “and may represent another putative target for miR-103.”
    Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim
  • Probably not a substantial claim: may not pass S3 (load-bearing).

    Interpretationcitation

    miR-131 is alternatively known in the Rfam database as miR-9*, as it appears to be expressed from the opposite strand of the miR-9 precursor.

    “In addition, miR-131 is alternatively known in the Rfam database as miR-9*, as it appears to be expressed from the opposite strand of the miR-9 precursor.”
    • Also stated in: § Additional information · plain
      “Similarly, miR-131 is alternatively named miR-9*, as it is expressed from the opposite strand of the miR-9 precursor.”
    Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim0 of 1 sources checked
    • cites Rfam

      Couldn’t be matched to a paper in Crossref, so it can’t be checked.

  • Classified as probably not a substantial claim. May combine two claims.

    Study design and conductnone given

    After normalization, data were averaged among duplicate arrays, and the resulting three data sets, each corresponding to an RNA sample, were treated as independent measurements for a two-tailed, two-sample t-test comparing developmental stages.

    “Upon normalization, the remaining data was averaged among duplicate arrays, and the resulting three data sets each corresponding to an RNA sample were considered independent measurements for the purposes of the two-tailed, two-sample t-test when comparing different developmental stages.”
    Quote in the paperSubstantial claim
  • Probably not a substantial claim: may not pass S3 (load-bearing). May combine two claims.

    Premisecitation

    Mutation of SMBP2 causes mouse neuromuscular degeneration, a disease similar to human spinal muscular atrophy and linked to miRNA-containing complex.

    “Mutation of this protein causes mouse neuromuscular degeneration (Cox et al. 1998), a disease similar to human spinal muscular atrophy and linked to miRNA-containing complex (see above).”
    Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim0 of 1 sources checked
    • cites Cox et al. 1998 source
  • Probably not a substantial claim: may not pass S3 (load-bearing).

    Premisecitation

    miRNAs miR-322-miR-351 have been recently cloned from rat neurons by Kim et al. (2003).

    “miRNAs miR-322-miR-351 have been recently cloned from rat neurons by Kim et al. (2003).”
    Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim0 of 1 sources checked
    • cites Kim et al. (2003)

      Couldn’t be matched to a paper in Crossref, so it can’t be checked.

  • Probably not a substantial claim: may not pass S3 (load-bearing). May combine two claims.

    Premisecitation

    Many tiny noncoding RNA molecules that are not processed from a miRNA-like hairpin precursor and are not phylogenetically conserved have been recently cloned from C. elegans and are likely to be expressed in vertebrates as well.

    “In addition, many tiny noncoding RNA molecules that are not processed from a miRNA-like hairpin precursor and are not phylogenetically conserved have been recently cloned from C. elegans and likely to express in vertebrates as well (Ambros et al. 2003).”
    Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim0 of 1 sources checked
    • cites Ambros et al. 2003 source
  • Probably not a substantial claim: may not pass S3 (load-bearing).

    Study design and conductnone given

    To ensure accuracy of the hybridizations, each RNA sample was hybridized with two or three membranes.

    “To ensure accuracy of the hybridizations, each RNA sample was hybridized with two or three membranes.”
    Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim
  • Probably not a substantial claim: may not pass S3 (load-bearing).

    Premisecitation

    Otx1 is necessary for normal corticogenesis.

    “Otx1, murine homolog of the Drosophila transcription factor orthodenticle, is necessary for normal corticogenesis (Simeone et al. 2002), and may represent another putative target for miR-103.”
    Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim0 of 1 sources checked
    • cites Simeone et al. 2002 source
  • Probably not a substantial claim: may not pass S3 (load-bearing).

    Study design and conductown data

    5S rRNA was detected by ethidium bromide staining to verify equal loading of total RNA.

    “5S rRNA was detected by ethidium bromide staining of the gels prior to transfer to verify equal loading of total RNA.”
    Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim
57 of 57
  • The paper relies on this without support.

    No function has been demonstrated for miRNA in mammals yet.

    “However, no function has been demonstrated for miRNA in mammals yet.”
  • The paper relies on this without support.

    PS1(+/-) heterozygous mice are phenotypically indistinguishable from wild-type animals.

    “PS1(+/-) heterozygous are phenotypically undistinguishable from wild-type animals.”
2 of 2

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

Each contradiction between two passages listed here was confirmed by an independent check.

  • Five expression-pattern categories are described as four

    Minor

    The text says the expression patterns fall into four categories, but its numbered list runs from (1) through (5).

1 of 1

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Research works printed but not linked: 1

  1. 1991, Dev. Brain Res., 61, 105

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
KRICHEVSKY, A. M., KING, K. S., DONAHUE, C. P., KHRAPKO, K., & KOSIK, K. S.
Affiliations
  • Brigham and Women's Hospital (US)
  • Beth Israel Deaconess Medical Center (US)
Corresponding author
KOSIK, KENNETH S.
Venue
RNA
Published
2003-09-16
Volume
9
Issue
10
Pages
1274-1281
ISSN
  • 1355-8382 (ISSN-L)
  • 1469-9001
OpenAlex
W2171833185
Cited by
1,040
References
34
Citations by year
2026: 3 · 2025: 17 · 2024: 9 · 2023: 16 · 2022: 22 · 2021: 30 · 2020: 18 · 2019: 34 · 2018: 38 · 2017: 46 · 2016: 41 · 2015: 64 · 2014: 71 · 2013: 86 · 2012: 68
FWCI
15.94
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Locations
  • RNA (publishedVersion)
  • Europe PMC (PubMed Central) (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed Central (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
  • HighWire Press Open Archive (submittedVersion)
Funders
  • National Science Foundation
  • National Institutes of Health
  • National Institute on Aging (R01AG018388, R01AG019787)
  • National Institute of Environmental Health Sciences (R01ES011343)
Topics
  • Life Sciences › Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology › Cancer Research › MicroRNA in disease regulation
  • Life Sciences › Agricultural and Biological Sciences › Plant Science › Plant Molecular Biology Research
  • Life Sciences › Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology › Molecular Biology › Developmental Biology and Gene Regulation
Keywords
miRNA expression profiling, brain development, oligonucleotide microarrays, miR-9, presenilin 1, mRNA targets, translational regulation, primary neurons
MeSH terms
Animals, Brain, Membrane Proteins, Blotting, Northern, DNA Primers, Mice, Knockout, Gene Expression Regulation, Developmental, Oligonucleotide Array Sequence Analysis, Gene Expression Profiling, MicroRNAs, Mice, Rats, Presenilin-1

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Claims read by deepseek-v4.1-flash under definition version 3 (extract-v3) on 2026-11-06.

Classified by jev-1.13-20260917 (gold-guideline-v0.2) on 2026-11-06.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review