The DOI matches its Crossref record; 10 of the 10 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
Sensing and responding to DNA damage
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cites
Carney, J. P., Maser, R. S., Olivares, H., Davis, E. M., Le Beau, M., Yates, J. R., Hays, L., Morgan, W. F., & Petrini, J. H. J. (1998) · Cell · doi:10.1016/s0092-8674(00)81175-7 · Cited by 1,226
A superfamily of conserved domains in DNA damage‐ responsive cell cycle checkpoint proteins
Bork, P., Hofmann, K., Bucher, P., Neuwald, A. F., Altschul, S. F., & Koonin, E. V. (1997) · The FASEB Journal · doi:10.1096/fasebj.11.1.9034168 · Cited by 746
Paulovich, A. G., & Hartwell, L. H. (1995) · Cell · doi:10.1016/0092-8674(95)90481-6 · Cited by 588
Hwang, B. J., Ford, J. M., Hanawalt, P. C., & Chu, G. (1999) · Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences · doi:10.1073/pnas.96.2.424 · Cited by 581
Control of the DNA damage checkpoint by Chk1 and Rad53 protein kinases through distinct mechanisms
Sanchez, Y., Bachant, J., Wang, H., Hu, F., Liu, D., Tetzlaff, M., & Elledge, S. J. (1999) · Science · doi:10.1126/science.286.5442.1166 · Cited by 536
Relocalization of telomeric Ku and SIR proteins in response to DNA strand breaks in yeast
Martin, S. G., Laroche, T., Suka, N., Grunstein, M., & Gasser, S. M. (1999) · Cell · doi:10.1016/s0092-8674(00)80773-4 · Cited by 464
Mills, K. D., Sinclair, D. A., & Guarente, L. (1999) · Cell · doi:10.1016/s0092-8674(00)80772-2 · Cited by 334
de la Torre‐Ruiz, M., Green, C. M., & Lowndes, N. F. (1998) · The EMBO Journal · doi:10.1093/emboj/17.9.2687 · Cited by 147
Self-citationDNA damage triggers disruption of telomeric silencing and Mec1p-dependent relocation of Sir3p
McAinsh, A. D., Scott-Drew, S., Murray, J. A. H., & Jackson, S. P. (1999) · Current Biology · doi:10.1016/s0960-9822(99)80424-2 · Cited by 115
Neecke, H., Lucchini, G., & Pia Longhese, M. (1999) · The EMBO Journal · doi:10.1093/emboj/18.16.4485 · Cited by 94
Cited by
Cell cycle checkpoint signaling through the ATM and ATR kinases
Abraham, R. T. (2001) · Genes & Development · doi:10.1101/gad.914401 · Cited by 1,966
Regulation of DNA replication fork progression through damaged DNA by the Mec1/Rad53 checkpoint
Tercero, J. A., & Diffley, J. F. X. (2001) · Nature · doi:10.1038/35087607 · Cited by 666
Taupin, P. (2007) · Brain Research Reviews · doi:10.1016/j.brainresrev.2006.08.002 · Cited by 645
ATM and ATR: networking cellular responses to DNA damage
Shiloh, Y. (2001) · Current Opinion in Genetics & Development · doi:10.1016/s0959-437x(00)00159-3 · Cited by 601
The role of p53 in determining sensitivity to radiotherapy
Gudkov, A. V., & Komarova, E. A. (2003) · Nature Reviews Cancer · doi:10.1038/nrc992 · Cited by 572
Metadata
- Authors
- Lowndes, N. F., & Murguia, J. R.
- Venue
- Current Opinion in Genetics & Development
- Publisher
- Elsevier BV
- Published
- 2000-02
- Volume
- 10
- Issue
- 1
- Pages
- 17-25
- ISSN
- 0959-437X (ISSN-L)
- OpenAlex
- W2154052847
- Cited by
- 266
- References
- 10
- FWCI
- 2.81
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Sensing and responding to DNA damage. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1016/s0959-437x(99)00050-7
- The paper
- Lowndes, N. F., & Murguia, J. R. (2000). Sensing and responding to DNA damage. Current Opinion in Genetics & Development. https://doi.org/10.1016/s0959-437x(99)00050-7
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.
