The DOI matches its Crossref record; 2 of the 2 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
Repeats in genomic DNA: mining and meaning
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cites
Human L1 retrotransposon encodes a conserved endonuclease required for retrotransposition
Feng, Q., Moran, J. V., Kazazian, H. H., & Boeke, J. D. (1996) · Cell · doi:10.1016/s0092-8674(00)81997-2 · Cited by 1,139
Molecular evidence from retroposons that whales form a clade within even-toed ungulates
Shimamura, M., Yasue, H., Ohshima, K., Abe, H., Kato, H., Kishiro, T., Goto, M., Munechika, I., & Okada, N. (1997) · Nature · doi:10.1038/41759 · Cited by 399
Cited by
Ab initio Gene Finding in Drosophila Genomic DNA
Salamov, A. A., & Solovyev, V. V. (2000) · Genome Research · doi:10.1101/gr.10.4.516 · Cited by 1,120
Brosius, J. (1999) · Gene · doi:10.1016/s0378-1119(99)00227-9 · Cited by 345
Matzke, M. A., Mette, M. F., & Matzke, A. J. M. (2000) · Plant Molecular Biology · doi:10.1023/a:1006484806925 · Cited by 214
Loss of epigenetic silencing in tumors preferentially affects primate-specific retroelements
Szpakowski, S., Sun, X., Lage, J. M., Dyer, A., Rubinstein, J., Kowalski, D., Sasaki, C., Costa, J., & Lizardi, P. M. (2009) · Gene · doi:10.1016/j.gene.2009.08.006 · Cited by 127
Galli, U. M., Sauter, M., Lecher, B., Maurer, S., Herbst, H., Roemer, K., & Mueller-Lantzsch, N. (2005) · Oncogene · doi:10.1038/sj.onc.1208543 · Cited by 120
Metadata
- Authors
- Jurka, J.
- Venue
- Current Opinion in Structural Biology
- Publisher
- Elsevier BV
- Published
- 1998-06
- Volume
- 8
- Issue
- 3
- Pages
- 333-337
- ISSN
- 0959-440X (ISSN-L)
- OpenAlex
- W2071398217
- Cited by
- 303
- References
- 2
- FWCI
- 2.36
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Repeats in genomic DNA: mining and meaning. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1016/s0959-440x(98)80067-5
- The paper
- Jurka, J. (1998). Repeats in genomic DNA: mining and meaning. Current Opinion in Structural Biology. https://doi.org/10.1016/s0959-440x(98)80067-5
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.
