The DOI matches its Crossref record; 2 of the 2 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
A reconceptualisation of the research into university academics' conceptions of teaching
Open accessAbstract
Articles about the conceptions of teaching of university academics are reviewed. There is found to be a high level of correspondence between largely independent studies reported in 13 articles. An attempt to synthesise the body of research places conceptions under two broad orientations characterised as teacher-centred/content-oriented and student-centred/learning-oriented. Each orientation has two associated conceptions. A transitionary category, labelled student-teacher interaction, links the two orientations. The five conceptions beneath the orientations are visualised as well-defined points within a continuum, and there is some evidence of lecturers shifting beliefs across the spectrum over time. Teaching conceptions have been shown to be related to measures of the quality of student learning, so are modelled as influencing teaching approaches which in turn effect student learning approaches and learning outcomes. It is argued that measures to enhance the quality of teaching should take account of teaching conceptions if they are to be effective, as teaching approaches are strongly influenced by the underlying beliefs of the teacher.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cites
The Discovery of Grounded Theory: Strategies for Qualitative Research
Glaser, B. G., & Strauss, A. L. (2017) · Aldine (Routledge reprint) · doi:10.4324/9780203793206 · Cited by 25,789
Marsh, H. W. (1987) · International Journal of Educational Research · doi:10.1016/0883-0355(87)90001-2 · Cited by 1,333
Cited by
Lizzio, A., Wilson, K., & Simons, R. (2002) · Studies in Higher Education · doi:10.1080/03075070120099359 · Cited by 1,415
Feedback: Focusing attention on engagement
Price, M., Handley, K., & Millar, J. (2011) · Studies in Higher Education · doi:10.1080/03075079.2010.483513 · Cited by 442
Englund, C., Olofsson, A. D., & Price, L. (2017) · Higher Education Research & Development · doi:10.1080/07294360.2016.1171300 · Cited by 423
Bolhuis, S. (2003) · Learning and Instruction · doi:10.1016/s0959-4752(02)00008-7 · Cited by 331
A framework for transition: supporting ‘learning to learn’ in higher education.
Wingate, U. (2007) · Higher Education Quarterly · doi:10.1111/j.1468-2273.2007.00361.x · Cited by 275
Metadata
- Authors
- Kember, D.
- Venue
- Learning and Instruction
- Publisher
- Elsevier BV
- Published
- 1997-09
- Volume
- 7
- Issue
- 3
- Pages
- 255-275
- ISSN
- 0959-4752 (ISSN-L)
- OpenAlex
- W2005492506
- Cited by
- 1,310
- References
- 2
- FWCI
- 60.80
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- green
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: A reconceptualisation of the research into university academics' conceptions of teaching. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1016/s0959-4752(96)00028-x
- The paper
- Kember, D. (1997). A reconceptualisation of the research into university academics' conceptions of teaching. Learning and Instruction. https://doi.org/10.1016/s0959-4752(96)00028-x
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.