The DOI matches its Crossref record; 2 of the 2 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
Comparison of psychological aspects and patient satisfaction following breast conserving surgery, simple mastectomy and breast reconstruction
Open accessAbstract
The aim of this study was to assess and compare the psychological outcome and satisfaction of patients whom underwent wide local excision, mastectomy alone and mastectomy with breast reconstruction. A total of 577 patients had different types of operations for primary breast cancer (254 (44%) had wide local excision, 202 (35%) had simple mastectomy and 121 (21%) had breast reconstruction). Psychosocial morbidity and satisfaction were studied retrospectively using self-evaluation questionnaires. The three different surgical groups were cross-matched into four different age group. Significant statistical differences existed between the three procedures regarding satisfaction and psychosocial morbidity (anxiety, depression, body image, sexuality and self-esteem) in favour of wide local excision followed by breast reconstruction. Greatest morbidity was seen in the mastectomy group. Patient satisfaction of cosmetic outcome and psychosocial aspects was greater with wide local excision than with breast reconstruction or mastectomy. However, since wide local excision is indicated in only a group of patients, breast reconstruction should be an option available to patients requiring mastectomy.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cites
The Hospital Anxiety and Depression Scale
Zigmond, A. S., & Snaith, R. P. (1983) · Acta Psychiatrica Scandinavica · doi:10.1111/j.1600-0447.1983.tb09716.x · Cited by 47,139
Society and the Adolescent Self-Image
Rosenberg, M. (1965) · doi:10.1515/9781400876136 · Cited by 30,126
Cited by
Body image issues in women with breast cancer
Helms, R. L., O'Hea, E. L., & Corso, M. (2008) · Psychology, Health & Medicine · doi:10.1080/13548500701405509 · Cited by 317
Body Image in Younger Breast Cancer Survivors: A Systematic Review
Paterson, C. L., Lengacher, C. A., Donovan, K. A., Kip, K. E., & Tofthagen, C. S. (2016) · Cancer Nursing · doi:10.1097/ncc.0000000000000251 · Cited by 285
Sheehan, J., Sherman, K. A., Lam, T., & Boyages, J. (2007) · Psycho-Oncology · doi:10.1002/pon.1067 · Cited by 240
Suicide Risk in Primary Care Patients With Major Physical Diseases: A Case-Control Study
Webb, R. T. (2012) · Archives of General Psychiatry · doi:10.1001/archgenpsychiatry.2011.1561 · Cited by 211
Persistent post-mastectomy pain: risk factors and current approaches to treatment
Tait, R. C., Zoberi, K., Ferguson, M., Levenhagen, K., Luebbert, R. A., Rowland, K., Salsich, G. B., & Herndon, C. (2018) · The Journal of Pain · doi:10.1016/j.jpain.2018.06.002 · Cited by 190
Metadata
- Authors
- Al-Ghazal, S. K., Fallowfield, L., & Blamey, R. W.
- Venue
- European Journal of Cancer
- Publisher
- Elsevier BV
- Published
- 2000-10
- Volume
- 36
- Issue
- 15
- Pages
- 1938-1943
- ISSN
- 0959-8049 (ISSN-L)
- OpenAlex
- W2070782275
- Cited by
- 655
- References
- 2
- FWCI
- 3.41
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- green
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Comparison of psychological aspects and patient satisfaction following breast conserving surgery, simple mastectomy and breast reconstruction. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1016/s0959-8049(00)00197-0
- The paper
- Al-Ghazal, S. K., Fallowfield, L., & Blamey, R. W. (2000). Comparison of psychological aspects and patient satisfaction following breast conserving surgery, simple mastectomy and breast reconstruction. European Journal of Cancer. https://doi.org/10.1016/s0959-8049(00)00197-0
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.