Cited by 190Anesthesia and Pain ManagementCancer survivorship and carePain Management and Treatment

Persistent post-mastectomy pain: risk factors and current approaches to treatment

Open access
Tait, Raymond C., Zoberi, Kim, Ferguson, McKenzie, Levenhagen, Kimberly, Luebbert, Rebecca A., Rowland, Kevin, Salsich, Gretchen B., Herndon, Christopher·2018·The Journal of Pain

Abstract

Persistent Post-Mastectomy Pain (PPMP) is a common condition that can follow surgeries for breast cancer, the most common cancer in women. Because of the frequency of PPMP and its potential severity, it has received increasing research attention. This manuscript reviews the recent research literature, beginning with a brief history and then relevant medical, surgical, demographic, and psychosocial risk factors. Subsequently, social, psychological, and functional sequelae that have been linked to PPMPS are considered, as is research on current pharmacological, psychological, and rehabilitative approaches to treatment. The review concludes with a discussion of directions for future research and treatment that might reduce the incidence and impact of PPMP on breast cancer survivors. PERSPECTIVE: This article describes current research literature involving mechanisms, risks, and treatments related to persistent post-mastectomy pain. Implications of research findings also are discussed for pre- and post-surgical approaches to pain management, current treatments, and promising research directions.

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1016/j.jpain.2018.06.002

Cites

175 of 175 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

3 of the 178 references couldn’t be matched to a known paper.

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Tait, R. C., Zoberi, K., Ferguson, M., Levenhagen, K., Luebbert, R. A., Rowland, K., Salsich, G. B., & Herndon, C.
Affiliations
  • Saint Louis University (ES)
  • Southern Illinois University Edwardsville (US)
  • Saint Louis University (US)
Corresponding author
Tait, Raymond C.
Venue
The Journal of Pain
Publisher
Elsevier BV
Published
2018-12
Volume
19
Issue
12
Pages
1367-1383
ISSN
1526-5900 (ISSN-L)
OpenAlex
W2811450224
Cited by
190
References
178
Citations by year
2026: 15 · 2025: 27 · 2024: 29 · 2023: 27 · 2022: 28 · 2021: 34 · 2020: 20 · 2019: 10
FWCI
3.56
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Locations
  • Journal of Pain (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
  • Europe PMC (PubMed Central) (acceptedVersion)
  • PubMed Central (acceptedVersion)
Funders
National Institute on Drug Abuse to the Southern Illinois University – Edwardsville and Saint Louis University Center of Excellence in Pain Education (HHSN271201500056C)
Topics
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Surgery › Anesthesia and Pain Management
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Oncology › Cancer survivorship and care
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Anesthesiology and Pain Medicine › Pain Management and Treatment
Keywords
breast cancer survivors, risk factors, psychosocial risk factors, pain management, pharmacotherapy, psychological intervention, rehabilitation, functional sequelae
MeSH terms
Breast Neoplasms, Female, Humans, Mastectomy, Pain, Postoperative, Postoperative Pain, Risk Factors

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review