Cited by 126RNA Research and SplicingRNA and protein synthesis mechanismsReproductive Biology and Fertility

Interaction of eIF4G with poly(A)-binding protein stimulates translation and is critical for Xenopus oocyte maturation

Open access
Wakiyama, Motoaki, Imataka, Hiroaki, Sonenberg, Nahum·2000·Current Biology

Abstract

The poly(A)-binding protein Pab1p interacts directly with the eukaryotic translation initiation factor 4G (eIF4G) to facilitate translation initiation of polyadenylated mRNAs in yeast [1,2]. Although the eIF4G-PABP interaction has also been demonstrated in a mammalian system [3,4], its biological significance in vertebrates is unknown. In Xenopus oocytes, cytoplasmic polyadenylation of several mRNAs coincides with their translational activation and is critical for maturation [5-7]. Because the amount of PABP is very low in oocytes [8], it has been argued that the eIF4G-PABP interaction does not play a major role in translational activation during oocyte maturation. Also, overexpression of PABP in Xenopus oocytes has only a modest stimulatory effect on translation of polyadenylated mRNA and does not alter either the efficiency or the kinetics of progesterone-induced maturation [9]. Here, we report that the expression of an eIF4GI mutant defective in PABP binding in Xenopus oocytes reduces translation of polyadenylated mRNA and dramatically inhibits progesterone-induced maturation. Our results show that the eIF4G-PABP interaction is critical for translational control of maternal mRNAs during Xenopus development.

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1016/s0960-9822(00)00701-6

Cites

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

We couldn’t retrieve this paper’s full text, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Wakiyama, M., Imataka, H., & Sonenberg, N.
Affiliations
McGill University (CA)
Corresponding author
Sonenberg, Nahum
Venue
Current Biology
Publisher
Elsevier BV
Published
2000-09
Volume
10
Issue
18
Pages
1147-1150
ISSN
0960-9822 (ISSN-L)
OpenAlex
W1966711656
Cited by
126
References
0
Citations by year
2026: 2 · 2025: 1 · 2024: 5 · 2023: 2 · 2022: 3 · 2021: 2 · 2020: 2 · 2019: 5 · 2018: 5 · 2017: 6 · 2016: 5 · 2015: 3 · 2014: 7 · 2013: 4
FWCI
3.40
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Locations
  • Current Biology (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
Funders
Medical Research Council Canada
Topics
  • Life Sciences › Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology › Molecular Biology › RNA Research and Splicing
  • Life Sciences › Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology › Molecular Biology › RNA and protein synthesis mechanisms
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Public Health, Environmental and Occupational Health › Reproductive Biology and Fertility
Keywords
eIF4G, poly(A)-binding protein, translation initiation, oocyte maturation, cytoplasmic polyadenylation, maternal mRNA translation, translational regulation, Xenopus oocytes
MeSH terms
Amino Acid Sequence, Animals, Humans, Luciferases, Microinjections, Molecular Sequence Data, Oocytes, Peptide Initiation Factors, Progesterone, RNA, Messenger, Protein Biosynthesis, Xenopus, Blotting, Western, Genes, mos, RNA-Binding Proteins, Amino Acid Substitution, Poly(A)-Binding Proteins, Eukaryotic Initiation Factor-4G

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review