Alternatives to the “New Urban Politics”: finding locality and autonomy in local economic development
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Claims the paper makes
Claims other papers make about this one
Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?
Previous studies have focused on the benefits and successes achieved by CLTs.
“previous studies (DeFilippis, 1999) have focused on the benefits and successes achieved by CLTs”
From Barriers and Community Land Trust’s Strategies in The Preservation of Affordable Housing (2019) · cites this paper as DeFilippis, 1999
Cited by
Sorted by citations
Barriers and Community Land Trust’s Strategies in The Preservation of Affordable Housing
(2019) · Journal of Environment and Earth Science · doi:10.7176/jees/9-3-02
- Authors
- DeFilippis, J.
- Affiliations
- Rutgers, The State University of New Jersey (US)
- Corresponding author
- DeFilippis, James
- ORCID
- DeFilippis, James
- Venue
- Political Geography
- Publisher
- Elsevier BV
- Published
- 1999-11
- Volume
- 18
- Issue
- 8
- Pages
- 973-990
- ISSN
- 0962-6298 (ISSN-L)
- OpenAlex
- W2035883256
- Cited by
- 91
- References
- 0
- Citations by year
- 2025: 1 · 2024: 2 · 2023: 2 · 2022: 4 · 2021: 3 · 2020: 5 · 2019: 4 · 2018: 4 · 2017: 6 · 2016: 1 · 2015: 4 · 2014: 4 · 2013: 6 · 2012: 1
- FWCI
- 15.88
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
- Locations
- Political Geography (publishedVersion)
- Topics
- Social Sciences › Political Science and International Relations › Local Economic Development and Planning
- Social Sciences › Urban Studies › Urban Planning and Governance
- Social Sciences › Urban Studies › Social Sciences and Governance
- Keywords
- local economic development, local autonomy, locality, urban political economy, local ownership, place production, local institutions, relationality, processuality
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
