Student or educator? Sign up with your school email and get 6 months of Pro free.
Cited by 569

The DOI matches its Crossref record; 2 of the 2 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.

Lactic acid starter and probiotic bacteria: a comparative “in vitro” study of probiotic characteristics and biological barrier resistance

Open access
Vinderola, C.G., Reinheimer, J.A.·2003·Food Research International

Abstract

Probiotic characteristics (deconjugation of bile salts, hydrophobicity and β-galactosidase activity) and the resistance to biological barriers (gastric juice and bile salts) of 24 strains of lactic acid starter bacteria (Streptococcus thermophilus, Lactobacillus delbrueckii subsp. bulgaricus and Lactococcus lactis) and 24 strains of probiotic bacteria (Lactobacillus acidophilus, Lactobacillus casei, Lactobacillus rhamnosus and bifidobacteria) were compared. Among the probiotic bacteria tested, Lactobacillus acidophilus was the most interesting species since it showed high values of resistance to gastric juice and bile, hydrophobicity and β-galactosidase and bile salts deconjugation activities. Bifidobacterium bifidum strains showed the same behavior, although the values of the parameters investigated were slightly lower than those obtained for Lactobacillus acidophilus. On the other hand, it was demonstrated that Lactobacillus delbrueckii subsp. bulgaricus was the lactic acid starter species with the best probiotic characteristics among the starter species assessed. It was resistant to gastric juice and bile, and showed high values for β-galactosidase activity. On the other hand, lactic acid starter bacteria showed hydrophobicity values similar to or higher than those obtained for the strains of the Lactobacillus casei . According to the results found, the total probiotic value of a fermented dairy product should take into account not only the intestinal probiotic cultures used in the formulation but also the probiotic contribution of the lactic acid starter microflora.

Overview

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1016/s0963-9969(03)00098-x

Cites

2 of 2 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Verification

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Citations

Cited by

See all 569

Metadata

Authors
Vinderola, C. G., & Reinheimer, J. A.
Venue
Food Research International
Publisher
Elsevier BV
Published
2003-01
Volume
36
Issue
9-10
Pages
895-904
ISSN
0963-9969 (ISSN-L)
OpenAlex
W1979781775
Cited by
569
References
2
FWCI
10.53
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
green

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review

How to cite

Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.

This page
CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Lactic acid starter and probiotic bacteria: a comparative “in vitro” study of probiotic characteristics and biological barrier resistance. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1016/s0963-9969(03)00098-x
The paper
Vinderola, C. G., & Reinheimer, J. A. (2003). Lactic acid starter and probiotic bacteria: a comparative “in vitro” study of probiotic characteristics and biological barrier resistance. Food Research International. https://doi.org/10.1016/s0963-9969(03)00098-x

Data sources

Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.

Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).

Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.