Cited by 263Wildlife Ecology and ConservationRangeland and Wildlife ManagementConservation, Ecology, Wildlife Education

The DOI matches its Crossref record.

The emergence of human–wildlife conflict management: turning challenges into opportunities

Messmer, Terry A·2000·International Biodeterioration & Biodegradation

Overview

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1016/s0964-8305(00)00045-7

Cites

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Verification

Claims the paper makes

We couldn’t retrieve this paper’s full text, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

Citations

Cites

No references could be resolved yet.

Research works printed but not linked: 19

  1. Bingham, 1997, Seeking consensus on resource management, Transactions of the North American Wildlife and Natural Resource Conference, 62, 127
  2. Conover, 1994, Perceptions of grass-roots leaders of the agricultural community about wildlife and wildlife damage on their farms and ranches, Wildlife Society Bulletin, 22, 94
  3. Conover, 1997, Wildlife management by metropolitan residents in the United States: practices, perceptions, costs, and values, Wildlife Society Bulletin, 25, 306
  4. Conover, 1997, Monetary and intangible evaluation of deer in the United States, Wildlife Society Bulletin, 25, 298
  5. Conover, 1998, Perceptions of American agricultural producers about wildlife on their farms and ranches, Wildlife Society Bulletin, 26, 597
  6. Conover, 1991, Wildlife damage to crops: perceptions of agricultural and wildlife professionals in 1957 and 1987, Wildlife Society Bulletin, 19, 46
  7. Conover, 1995, Review of human injuries, illnesses, and economic losses caused by wildlife in the United States, Wildlife Society Bulletin, 23, 407
  8. Decker, 1982, Fruit growers’ vs. other farmers’ attitudes toward deer in New York, Wildlife Society Bulletin, 10, 150
  9. Decker, 1996, From clients to stakeholders: a philosophical shift for fish and wildlife management, Human Dimensions in Wildlife, 1, 70, 10.1080/10871209609359053 · DOI
  10. Fall, 1998, A new era of vertebrate pest control? An introduction special issue, International Biodeterioration and Biodegradation, 42, 85, 10.1016/S0964-8305(98)00058-4 · DOI
  11. Guynn, 1997, Miracle in Montana — managing conflicts over private lands and public wildlife issues, Transactions of the North American Wildlife and Natural Resource Conference, 62, 146
  12. Hewitt, 1997, Responsiveness of agencies and organizations to wildlife damage: policy process implications, Wildlife Society Bulletin, 25, 418
  13. Kellert, S.R., 1980. Contemporary values of wildlife in American society. In: Shaw, W.W., Zube, E.H. (Eds.), Wildlife Values, U.S. Forest Service, Rocky Mountain Forest and Range Experiment Station, Instructional Service Report 1, pp. 31–59
  14. Messmer, 1997, Legal considerations regarding lethal and nonlethal approaches to managing urban Deer, Wildlife Society Bulletin, 25, 424
  15. Messmer, 1997, Stake holder acceptance of urban deer management techniques, Wildlife Society Bulletin, 25, 360
  16. Messmer, 1999, United States public attitudes regarding predators and their management to enhance avian recruitment, Wildlife Society Bulletin, 27, 75
  17. Sovoda, 1980, Professionalism and wildlife management on private lands, Wildlife Society Bulletin, 8, 96
  18. Tanner, 1983, An assessment of farmers’ attitudes toward deer and deer damage in west Tennessee, Proceedings of the Eastern Wildlife Damage Control Conference, 1, 195
  19. Warren, 1997, The challenge of deer over abundance in the 21st century, Wildlife Society Bulletin, 25, 213

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Items 101–200 of 226

Metadata

Authors
Messmer, T. A.
Affiliations
Utah State University (US)
Corresponding author
Messmer, Terry A
Venue
International Biodeterioration & Biodegradation
Publisher
Elsevier BV
Published
2000-04
Volume
45
Issue
3-4
Pages
97-102
ISSN
0964-8305 (ISSN-L)
OpenAlex
W2054005929
Cited by
263
References
0
Citations by year
2026: 4 · 2025: 10 · 2024: 15 · 2023: 16 · 2022: 13 · 2021: 25 · 2020: 20 · 2019: 23 · 2018: 16 · 2017: 9 · 2016: 13 · 2015: 19 · 2014: 8 · 2013: 17 · 2012: 9
FWCI
1.72
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed
Locations
International Biodeterioration & Biodegradation (publishedVersion)
Topics
  • Physical Sciences › Environmental Science › Ecology › Wildlife Ecology and Conservation
  • Physical Sciences › Environmental Science › Ecology › Rangeland and Wildlife Management
  • Physical Sciences › Environmental Science › Management, Monitoring, Policy and Law › Conservation, Ecology, Wildlife Education
Keywords
wildlife damage management, animal damage control, wildlife conservation, wildlife damage to agriculture

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review