The DOI matches its Crossref record.
10.1016/s0967-0653(97)89288-5
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cited by
Redfield revisited: Variability of C:N: P in marine microalgae and its biochemical basis
Geider, R., & La Roche, J. (2002) · European Journal of Phycology · doi:10.1017/s0967026201003456 · Cited by 1,412
Phycobiliproteins as a commodity: Trends in applied research, patents and commercialization
Sekar, S., & Chandramohan, M. (2008) · Journal of Applied Phycology · doi:10.1007/s10811-007-9188-1 · Cited by 589
Photosynthetic pigments in diatoms
Kuczynska, P., Jemiola-Rzeminska, M., & Strzalka, K. (2015) · Marine Drugs · doi:10.3390/md13095847 · Cited by 428
Chlorophyll Extraction from Microalgae: A Review on the Process Engineering Aspects
Hosikian, A., Lim, S., Halim, R., & Danquah, M. K. (2010) · International Journal of Chemical Engineering · doi:10.1155/2010/391632 · Cited by 394
Industrial potential of carotenoid pigments from microalgae: Current trends and future prospects
Ambati, R. R., Gogisetty, D., Aswathanarayana, R. G., Ravi, S., Bikkina, P. N., Bo, L., & Yuepeng, S. (2019) · Critical Reviews in Food Science and Nutrition · doi:10.1080/10408398.2018.1432561 · Cited by 372
Metadata
- Venue
- CrossRef Listing of Deleted DOIs
- Publisher
- Unmaintained records
- Published
- 2000
- ISSN
- 0849-6757 (ISSN-L)
- OpenAlex
- W1911272828
- Cited by
- 1,257
- References
- 0
- FWCI
- 157.40
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: 10.1016/s0967-0653(97)89288-5. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1016/s0967-0653(97)89288-5
- The paper
- 10.1016/s0967-0653(97)89288-5. (2000). CrossRef Listing of Deleted DOIs. https://doi.org/10.1016/s0967-0653(97)89288-5
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.
