Cited by 48Reproductive biology and impacts on aquatic speciesMarine and fisheries researchFish Biology and Ecology Studies

Rapports gonado-somatiques et variations saisonnières des stéroïdes sexuels chez le listao (Katsuwonus pelamis) et l'albacore (Thunnus albacares) dans l'ouest de l'océan Indien.

Stéquert, B·2001·Aquatic Living Resources

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1016/s0990-7440(01)01126-3

Cites

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

We couldn’t retrieve this paper’s full text, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

Authors
Stéquert, B.
Affiliations
Institut de Recherche pour le Développement (FR)
Corresponding author
Stéquert, B
Venue
Aquatic Living Resources
Publisher
Elsevier BV
Published
2001-10
Volume
14
Issue
5
Pages
313-318
ISSN
0990-7440 (ISSN-L)
OpenAlex
W2145667078
Cited by
48
References
0
Citations by year
2026: 1 · 2025: 1 · 2024: 1 · 2023: 2 · 2022: 1 · 2021: 4 · 2020: 2 · 2019: 2 · 2018: 3 · 2017: 1 · 2016: 3 · 2015: 3 · 2014: 6 · 2013: 4 · 2012: 5
FWCI
0.50
Type
journal article
Language
fr
Open access
closed
Locations
Aquatic Living Resources (publishedVersion)
Topics
  • Life Sciences › Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology › Physiology › Reproductive biology and impacts on aquatic species
  • Physical Sciences › Environmental Science › Global and Planetary Change › Marine and fisheries research
  • Life Sciences › Agricultural and Biological Sciences › Aquatic Science › Fish Biology and Ecology Studies
Keywords
skipjack tuna, yellowfin tuna, gonadosomatic index, sex steroids, estradiol, estrone, testosterone, 11-ketotestosterone, vitellogenesis, steroidogenesis, seasonal reproduction, monsoon, fish reproduction, Western Indian Ocean, climate effects

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review