Cited by 51Clinical Nutrition and GastroenterologyHyperglycemia and glycemic control in critically ill and hospitalized patientsTraumatic Brain Injury and Neurovascular Disturbances

Early enteral combined with parenteral nutrition treatment for severe traumatic brain injury: effects on immune function, nutritional status and outcomes

Open access
Fan, Ming-chao, Wang, Qiao-ling, Fang, Wei, Jiang, Yun-xia, Li, Lian-di, Sun, Peng, Wang, Zhi-hong·2016·Chinese Medical Sciences Journal

Abstract

To compare the conjoint effect of enteral nutrition (EN) and parenteral nutrition (PN) with single EN or PN on immune function, nutritional status, complications and clinical outcomes of patients with severe traumatic brain injury (STBI). A prospective randomized control trial was carried out from January 2009 to May 2012 in Neurological Intensive Care Unit (NICU). Patients of STBI who met the enrolment criteria (Glasgow Coma Scale score 6∼8; Nutritional Risk Screening ≥ 3) were randomly divided into 3 groups and were administrated EN, PN or EN + PN treatments respectively. The indexes of nutritional status, immune function, complications and clinical outcomes were examined and compared statistically. There were 120 patients enrolled in the study, with 40 pationts in each group. In EN+PN group, T lymthocyte subsets CD3+%, CD4+%, ratio of CD3+/CD25+, ratio of CD4+/CD8+, the plasma levels of IgA, IgM, and IgG at 20 days after nutritional treatment were significantly increased compared to the baseline(t=4.32–30.00, P<0.01), and they were significantly higher than those of PN group (t=2.44–14.70; P<0.05, or P<0.01) with exception of CD4+/CD8+, higher than those of EN group (t=2.49–13.31, P<0.05, or P<0.01) with exceptions of CD3+/CD25+, CD4+/CD8+, IgG and IgM. For the nutritional status, the serum total protein, albumin, prealbumin and hemoglobin were significantly higher in the EN (t=5.87–11.91; P<0.01) and EN+PN groups (t=6.12–13.12; P<0.01) than those in PN group after nutrition treatment. The serum prealbumin was higher in EN+PN group than that in EN group (t=2.08; P<0.05). Compared to the PN group, the complication occurrence rates of EN+PN group were significantly lower in stress ulcer (22.5% vs. 47.5%; χ2= 8.24, P<0.01), intracranial infection (12.5% vs 32.5%;χ2= 6.88, P<0.01) and pyemia (25.0% vs. 47.5%; χ2= 6.57, P<0.05). Compared to the EN group, the complication occurrence rates of EN+PN group were significantly lower in aspirated pneumonia (27.5% vs. 50.0%; χ2= 6.39, P<0.05), hypoproteinemia (17.5% vs. 55.0%; χ2= 18.26, P<0.01) and diarrhea (20.0% vs. 60.0%; χ2 = 20.00, P<0.01). The EN+PN group also had significant less length of stay in NICU (t=2.51, 4.82; P<0.05, P<0.01), number of patients receiving assisted mechanical ventilation (χ2= 6.08, 12.88; P<0.05, P<0.01) and its durations (t=3.41, 9.08; P<0.05, P<0.01), and the death rate (χ2=7.50, 16.37; P<0.05, P<0.01) than those of EN or PN group. Early EN+PN treatment could promote the recovery of the immune function, enhance nutritional status, decrease complications and improve the clinical outcomes in patients with severe traumatic brain injury.

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1016/s1001-9294(17)30003-2

Cites

1 of 1 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

We couldn’t retrieve this paper’s full text, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • Fan et al. compared three groups: early EN, early PN and EN followed by supplemental PN. Complications and mortality were significantly decreased and nutritional status and clinical outcomes were improved in the early EN + supplemental PN group.

    “Fan et al. [125] compared three groups: early EN, early PN and EN followed by supplemental PN.Complications and mortality were significantly decreased and nutritional status and clinical outcomes were improved in the early EN þ supplemental PN group.”

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Fan, M.-C., Wang, Q.-L., Fang, W., Jiang, Y.-X., Li, L.-D., Sun, P., & Wang, Z.-H.
Affiliations
Affiliated Hospital of Qingdao University (CN)
Venue
Chinese Medical Sciences Journal
Publisher
Elsevier BV
Published
2016-12
Volume
31
Issue
4
Pages
213-220
ISSN
1001-9294 (ISSN-L)
OpenAlex
W2568171527
Cited by
51
References
1
Citations by year
2026: 4 · 2025: 6 · 2024: 4 · 2023: 3 · 2022: 6 · 2021: 8 · 2020: 8 · 2019: 3 · 2018: 6 · 2017: 2
FWCI
3.83
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Locations
  • Chinese Medical Sciences Journal (publishedVersion, cc-by-nc-nd)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
Topics
  • Health Sciences › Nursing › Nutrition and Dietetics › Clinical Nutrition and Gastroenterology
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Endocrinology, Diabetes and Metabolism › Hyperglycemia and glycemic control in critically ill and hospitalized patients
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Neurology › Traumatic Brain Injury and Neurovascular Disturbances
Keywords
enteral nutrition, parenteral nutrition, severe traumatic brain injury, immune function, nutritional status, prealbumin, serum albumin, serum total protein, hemoglobin, T cell subsets, stress ulcer, neurological outcome, Glasgow Coma Scale, nutritional risk screening, intensive care unit patients
MeSH terms
Brain Injuries, Traumatic, Adult, Enteral Nutrition, Female, Humans, Male, Middle Aged, Nutritional Status, Parenteral Nutrition, Treatment Outcome

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review