The DOI matches its Crossref record; 1 of the 1 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
Phyto-Toxicity of Chromium in Maize: Oxidative Damage, Osmolyte Accumulation, Anti-Oxidative Defense and Chromium Uptake
Open accessAbstract
Agricultural production systems are immensely exposed to different environmental stresses in which heavy metal stress receives serious concerns. This study was conducted to explore the deleterious effects of different chromium (Cr) stress levels, i.e., 0, 30, 60, 90, 120, and 150 μmol L−1, on two maize genotypes, Wandan 13 and Runnong 35. Both genotypes were evaluated by measuring their growth and yield characteristics, Cr accumulation in different plant tissues, alterations in osmolyte accumulation, generation of reactive oxygen species (ROS), and anti-oxidative enzyme activity to scavenge ROS. The results showed that Cr stress decreased the leaf area, cob formation, 100-grain weight, shoot fresh biomass, and yield formation, while Cr accumulation in different maize tissues was found in the order of roots > leaves > stem > seeds in both genotypes. The increased Cr toxicity resulted in higher free proline, soluble sugars and total phenolic contents, and lower soluble protein contents. However, enhanced lipid peroxidation was noticed in the forms of malondialdehyde, hydrogen peroxide (H2O2) and thiobarbituric acid reactive substance accumulation, and electrolyte leakage. The hyperactivity of superoxide dismutase, peroxidase, catalase, ascorbate peroxidase, especially glutathione peroxidase and glutathione reductase indicated that these anti-oxidative enzymes had a central role in protecting maize from Cr toxicity, especially for Wandan 13. Moreover, higher uptake and less translocation of Cr contents into the grains of Wandan 13 implied its importance as a potential candidate against soil Cr pollution.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cites
Rapid determination of free proline for water-stress studies
Bates, L. S., Waldren, R. P., & Teare, I. D. (1973) · Plant and Soil · doi:10.1007/bf00018060 · Cited by 20,967
Cited by
Chromium Bioaccumulation and Its Impacts on Plants: An Overview
Sharma, A., Kapoor, D., Wang, J., Shahzad, B., Kumar, V., Bali, A. S., Jasrotia, S., Zheng, B., Yuan, H., & Yan, D. (2020) · Plants · doi:10.3390/plants9010100 · Cited by 527
Microbial Interventions in Bioremediation of Heavy Metal Contaminants in Agroecosystem
Pande, V., Pandey, S. C., Sati, D., Bhatt, P., & Samant, M. (2022) · Frontiers in Microbiology · doi:10.3389/fmicb.2022.824084 · Cited by 373
Wakeel, A., Xu, M., & Gan, Y. (2020) · International Journal of Molecular Sciences · doi:10.3390/ijms21030728 · Cited by 299
Metadata
- Authors
- ANJUM, S. A., ASHRAF, U., KHAN, I., TANVEER, M., SHAHID, M., SHAKOOR, A., & WANG, L.
- Venue
- Pedosphere
- Publisher
- Elsevier BV
- Published
- 2017-04
- Volume
- 27
- Issue
- 2
- Pages
- 262-273
- ISSN
- 1002-0160 (ISSN-L)
- OpenAlex
- W2592574075
- Cited by
- 166
- References
- 1
- FWCI
- 4.92
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- green
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Phyto-Toxicity of Chromium in Maize: Oxidative Damage, Osmolyte Accumulation, Anti-Oxidative Defense and Chromium Uptake. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1016/s1002-0160(17)60315-1
- The paper
- ANJUM, S. A., ASHRAF, U., KHAN, I., TANVEER, M., SHAHID, M., SHAKOOR, A., & WANG, L. (2017). Phyto-Toxicity of Chromium in Maize: Oxidative Damage, Osmolyte Accumulation, Anti-Oxidative Defense and Chromium Uptake. Pedosphere. https://doi.org/10.1016/s1002-0160(17)60315-1
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.