The DOI matches its Crossref record; 4 of the 4 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
Effects on aquatic ecosystems
Open accessAbstract
Regarding the effects of UV-B radiation on aquatic ecosystems, recent scientific and public interest has focused on marine primary producers and on the aquatic web, which has resulted in a multitude of studies indicating mostly detrimental effects of UV-B radiation on aquatic organisms. The interest has expanded to include ecologically significant groups and major biomass producers using mesocosm studies, emphasizing species interactions. This paper assesses the effects of UV-B radiation on dissolved organic matter, decomposers, primary and secondary producers, and briefly summarizes recent studies in freshwater and marine systems. Dissolved organic carbon (DOC) and paniculate organic carbon (POC) are degradation products of living organisms. These substances are of importance in the cycling of carbon in aquatic ecosystems. UV-B radiation has been found to break down high-molecular-weight substances and make them available to bacterial degradation. In addition, DOC is responsible for short-wavelength absorption in the water column. Especially in coastal areas and freshwater ecosystems, penetration of solar radiation is limited by high concentrations of dissolved and particulate matter. On the other hand, climate warming and acidification result in faster degradation of these substances and thus enhance the penetration of UV radiation into the water column. Several research groups have investigated light penetration into the water column. Past studies on UV penetration into the water column were based on temporally and spatially scattered measurements. The process of spectral attenuation of radiant energy in natural waters is well understood and straightforward to model. Less known is the spatial and temporal variability of in-water optical properties influencing UV attenuation and there are few long-term observations. In Europe, this deficiency of measurements is being corrected by a project involving the development of a monitoring system (ELDONET) for solar radiation using three-channel dosimeters (UV-A, UV-B, PAR) that are being installed from Abisko (North Sweden, 68 °N, 19 °E) to Tenerife (Canary Islands, 27 °N, 17 °W). Some of the instruments have been installed in the water column (North Sea, Baltic Sea, Kattegat, East and Western Mediterranean, North Atlantic), establishing the first network of underwater dosimeters for continuous monitoring. Bacteria play a vital role in mineralization of organic matter and provide a trophic link to higher organisms. New techniques have substantially changed our perception of the role of bacteria in aquatic ecosystems over the recent past and bacterioplankton productivity is far greater than previously thought, having high division and turnover rates. It has been shown that bacterioplankton play a central role in the carbon flux in aquatic ecosystems by taking up DOC and remineralizing the carbon. Bacterioplankton are more prone to UV-B stress than larger eukaryotic organisms and, based on one study, produce about double the amount of cyclobutane dimers. Recently, the mechanism of nitrogen fixation by cyanobacteria has been shown to be affected by UV-B stress. Wetlands constitute important ecosystems both in the tropics and at temperate latitudes. In these areas, cyanobacteria form major constituents in microbial mats. The organisms optimize their position in the community by vertical migration in the mat, which is controlled by both visible and UV-B radiation. Cyanobacteria are also important in tropical and sub-tropical rice paddy fields, where they contribute significantly to the availability of nitrogen. Solar UV radiation affects growth, development and several physiological responses of these organisms. On a global basis, phytoplankton are the most important biomass producers in aquatic ecosystems. The organisms populate the top layers of the oceans and freshwater habitats where they receive sufficient solar radiation for photosynthetic processes. New research strengthens previous evidence that solar UV affects growth and reproduction, photosynthetic energy-harvesting enzymes and other cellular proteins, as well as photosynthetic pigment contents. The uptake of ammonium and nitrate is affected by solar radiation in phytoplankton, as well as in macroalgae. Damage to phytoplankton at the molecular, cellular, population and community levels has been demonstrated. In contrast, at the ecosystem level there are few convincing data with respect to the effects of ozone-related UV-B increases and considerable uncertainty remains. Following UV-B irradiation, shifts in phytoplankton community structure have been demonstrated, which may have consequences for the food web. Macroalgae and seagrasses are important biomass producers in aquatic ecosystems (but considerably smaller than phytoplankton). In contrast to phytoplankton, most of these organisms are sessile and can thus not avoid exposure to solar radiation at their growth site. Recent investigations showed a pronoun
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cites
Climatic Warming and the Decline of Zooplankton in the California Current
Roemmich, D., & McGowan, J. (1995) · Science · doi:10.1126/science.267.5202.1324 · Cited by 798
Dunlap, W. C., & Shick, J. M. (1998) · Journal of Phycology · doi:10.1046/j.1529-8817.1998.340418.x · Cited by 360
Effects of ultraviolet radiation on corals and other coral reef organisms
SHICK, J. M., LESSER, M. P., & JOKIEL, P. L. (1996) · Global Change Biology · doi:10.1111/j.1365-2486.1996.tb00065.x · Cited by 251 · cited 2×
“Other UV-B sensitive marine organisms include sea urchins and corals [27,140].”
BackgroundScott, L. C. (1995) · Marine Biology · doi:10.1007/bf00349123 · Cited by 56
Cited by
UV-induced DNA damage and repair: a review
Sinha, R. P., & Häder, D.-P. (2002) · Photochemical & Photobiological Sciences · doi:10.1039/b201230h · Cited by 1,978
Self-citationPotential impacts of global climate change on freshwater fisheries
Ficke, A. D., Myrick, C. A., & Hansen, L. J. (2007) · Reviews in Fish Biology and Fisheries · doi:10.1007/s11160-007-9059-5 · Cited by 1,208
Allelopathy of Aquatic Autotrophs
Gross, E. M. (2003) · Critical Reviews in Plant Sciences · doi:10.1080/713610859 · Cited by 659
Effects of increased solar ultraviolet radiation on terrestrial ecosystems
Caldwell, M. M., Björn, L. O., Bornman, J. F., Flint, S. D., Kulandaivelu, G., Teramura, A. H., & Tevini, M. (1998) · Journal of Photochemistry and Photobiology B: Biology · doi:10.1016/s1011-1344(98)00184-5 · Cited by 550
Chromophoric DOM in the coastal environment
Blough, N. V., & Del Vecchio, R. (2002) · Biogeochemistry of Marine Dissolved Organic Matter · doi:10.1016/b978-012323841-2/50012-9 · Cited by 506
Metadata
- Authors
- Häder, D.-P., Kumar, H. D., Smith, R. C., & Worrest, R. C.
- Venue
- Journal of Photochemistry and Photobiology B: Biology
- Publisher
- Elsevier BV
- Published
- 1998-10
- Volume
- 46
- Issue
- 1-3
- Pages
- 53-68
- ISSN
- 1011-1344 (ISSN-L)
- OpenAlex
- W1969447447
- Cited by
- 405
- References
- 4
- FWCI
- 14.76
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- hybrid
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Effects on aquatic ecosystems. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1016/s1011-1344(98)00185-7
- The paper
- Häder, D.-P., Kumar, H. D., Smith, R. C., & Worrest, R. C. (1998). Effects on aquatic ecosystems. Journal of Photochemistry and Photobiology B: Biology. https://doi.org/10.1016/s1011-1344(98)00185-7
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.