Cited by 51Cryospheric studies and observationsGeology and Paleoclimatology ResearchClimate variability and models

Modelling the inception of the Patagonian icesheet

Sugden, David E, Hulton, Nicholas R.J, Purves, Ross S·2002·Quaternary International

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1016/s1040-6182(02)00027-7

Cites

34 of 34 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

We couldn’t retrieve this paper’s full text, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

3 of the 37 references couldn’t be matched to a known paper.

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Sugden, D. E., Hulton, N. R. J., & Purves, R. S.
Affiliations
University of Edinburgh (GB)
Corresponding author
Sugden, David E
Venue
Quaternary International
Publisher
Elsevier BV
Published
2002-09
Volume
95-96
Pages
55-64
ISSN
1040-6182 (ISSN-L)
OpenAlex
W2147260549
Cited by
51
References
37
Citations by year
2025: 2 · 2024: 6 · 2023: 3 · 2022: 5 · 2021: 2 · 2019: 1 · 2018: 1 · 2016: 3 · 2015: 1 · 2014: 1 · 2012: 3
FWCI
1.24
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed
Locations
Quaternary International (publishedVersion)
Funders
  • Carnegie Trust for the Universities of Scotland
  • Natural Environment Research Council
Topics
  • Physical Sciences › Earth and Planetary Sciences › Atmospheric Science › Cryospheric studies and observations
  • Physical Sciences › Earth and Planetary Sciences › Atmospheric Science › Geology and Paleoclimatology Research
  • Physical Sciences › Environmental Science › Global and Planetary Change › Climate variability and models
Keywords
ice sheet growth, Last Glacial Maximum, mass balance, glacial-interglacial cycles, Patagonian Icefields

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review