Cited by 85Mast cells and histamineSkin Protection and AgingDermatology and Skin Diseases

Mast cells, neuropeptides, histamine, and prostaglandins in UV-induced systemic immunosuppression

Hart, Prue H., Townley, Scott L., Grimbaldeston, Michele A., Khalil, Zeinab, Finlay-Jones, John J.·2002·Methods

Abstract

There is a direct correlation between dermal mast cell prevalence in dorsal skin of different mouse strains and susceptibility to UVB-induced systemic immunosuppression; highly UV-susceptible C57BL/6 mice have a high dermal mast cell prevalence while BALB/c mice, which require considerable UV radiation for 50% immunosuppression, have a low mast cell prevalence. There is also a functional link between the prevalence of dermal mast cells and susceptibility to UVB- and cis-urocanic acid (UCA)-induced systemic immunosuppression. Mast cell-depleted mice are unresponsive to UVB or cis-UCA for systemic immunosuppression unless they are previously reconstituted at the irradiated or cis-UCA-administered site with bone marrow-derived mast cell precursors. cis-UCA does not stimulate mast cell degranulation directly. Instead, in support of studies showing that neither UVB nor cis-UCA was immunosuppressive in capsaicin-treated, neuropeptide-depleted mice, cis-UCA-stimulated neuropeptide release from sensory c-fibers which, in turn, could efficiently degranulate mast cells. Studies in mice suggested that histamine, and not tumor necrosis factor alpha (TNF-alpha), was the product from mast cells that stimulated downstream immunosuppression. Histamine receptor antagonists reduced by approximately 60% UVB and cis-UCA-induced systemic immunosuppression. Indomethacin administration to mice had a similar effect which was not cumulative with the histamine receptor antagonists. Histamine can stimu…

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1016/s1046-2023(02)00201-3

Cites

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

This paper’s full text isn’t openly available, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Hart, P. H., Townley, S. L., Grimbaldeston, M. A., Khalil, Z., & Finlay-Jones, J. J.
Affiliations
  • Flinders University (AU)
  • The University of Melbourne (AU)
Corresponding author
Hart, Prue H.
Venue
Methods
Publisher
Elsevier BV
Published
2002-09
Volume
28
Issue
1
Pages
79-89
ISSN
1046-2023 (ISSN-L)
OpenAlex
W1975321984
Cited by
85
References
0
Citations by year
2026: 1 · 2025: 1 · 2023: 3 · 2022: 2 · 2021: 1 · 2019: 1 · 2018: 2 · 2017: 5 · 2016: 2 · 2014: 1 · 2013: 5 · 2012: 7
FWCI
1.75
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed
Locations
  • Methods (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
  • Adelaide Research & Scholarship (AR&S) (University of Adelaide) (submittedVersion)
Funders
University of Chinese Academy of Sciences
Topics
  • Life Sciences › Immunology and Microbiology › Immunology › Mast cells and histamine
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Dermatology › Skin Protection and Aging
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Dermatology › Dermatology and Skin Diseases
Keywords
mast cells, UVB-induced immunosuppression, systemic immunosuppression, cis-urocanic acid, histamine, prostaglandin E2, neuropeptides, mast cell degranulation, antihistamines, indomethacin, Th2 cells, contact hypersensitivity, mouse strain differences, mast cell depletion
MeSH terms
Animals, Dermatitis, Contact, Female, Histamine, Immune Tolerance, Indomethacin, Male, Mast Cells, Mice, Inbred Strains, Microcirculation, Neuropeptides, Prostaglandins, Ultraviolet Rays, Urocanic Acid, Cell Degranulation, Rats, Sprague-Dawley, Nerve Growth Factor, Mice, Rats

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review