Competitive dynamics in face of technological discontinuity: a framework for action
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Cited by
Sorted by citations
Networking and innovation: a systematic review of the evidence
Pittaway, L., Robertson, M., Munir, K., Denyer, D., & Neely, A. (2004) · International Journal of Management Reviews · doi:10.1111/j.1460-8545.2004.00101.x · Cited by 1,747 · see citing works
Self-citation
- Authors
- Munir, K. A.
- Affiliations
- University of Cambridge (GB)
- Corresponding author
- Munir, Kamal A
- Venue
- The Journal of High Technology Management Research
- Publisher
- Elsevier BV
- Published
- 2003-03
- Volume
- 14
- Issue
- 1
- Pages
- 93-109
- ISSN
- 1047-8310 (ISSN-L)
- OpenAlex
- W2022714893
- Cited by
- 19
- References
- 0
- Citations by year
- 2025: 1 · 2022: 1 · 2018: 2 · 2016: 2 · 2015: 1 · 2014: 2
- FWCI
- 2.52
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
- Locations
- The Journal of High Technology Management Research (publishedVersion)
- Topics
- Social Sciences › Decision Sciences › Management Science and Operations Research › Innovation Diffusion and Forecasting
- Social Sciences › Business, Management and Accounting › Strategy and Management › Digital Platforms and Economics
- Social Sciences › Business, Management and Accounting › Strategy and Management › Innovation and Knowledge Management
- Keywords
- technological discontinuity, design competition, technology dominance, technological evolution, competitive advantage, technology selection, strategic alliances
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
