Cited by 27Advanced Electron Microscopy Techniques and ApplicationsCollagen: Extraction and CharacterizationEnzyme Structure and Function

Three-dimensional reconstructions of extracellular matrix polymers using automated electron tomography

Baldock, C., Gilpin, C.J., Koster, A.J., Ziese, U., Kadler, K.E., Kielty, C.M., Holmes, D.F.·2002·Journal of Structural Biology

Abstract

The extracellular matrix is an intricate network of macromolecules which provides support for cells and a framework for tissues. The detailed structure and organisation of most matrix polymers is poorly understood. These polymers have a complex ultrastructure, and it has proved a major challenge both to define their structural organisation and to relate this to their biological function. However, new approaches using automated electron tomography are beginning to reveal important insights into the molecular assembly and structural organisation of two of the most abundant polymer systems in the extracellular matrix. We have generated three-dimensional reconstructions of collagen fibrils from bovine cornea and fibrillin microfibrils from ciliary zonules. Analysis of these data has provided new insights into the organisation and function of these large macromolecular assemblies.

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1016/s1047-8477(02)00028-x

Cites

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

This paper’s full text isn’t openly available, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • At the supra-molecular level, the initial building block is a 4-8 nm wide microfibril with a left-handed twist of the constituent molecules.

    “At the supra-molecular level, the initial building block is a 4–8 nm wide microfibril (Baldock et al., 2002) with a left-handed twist of the constituent molecules (Fig. 2).”

    From Corneal structure and transparency (2015) · cites this paper as Baldock et al., 2002

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Baldock, C., Gilpin, C. J., Koster, A. J., Ziese, U., Kadler, K. E., Kielty, C. M., & Holmes, D. F.
Affiliations
  • University of Manchester (GB)
  • Utrecht University (NL)
Corresponding author
Baldock, C.
Venue
Journal of Structural Biology
Publisher
Elsevier BV
Published
2002-04
Volume
138
Issue
1-2
Pages
130-136
ISSN
1047-8477 (ISSN-L)
OpenAlex
W2126180289
Cited by
27
References
0
Citations by year
2020: 1 · 2019: 1 · 2017: 2 · 2016: 1 · 2015: 1 · 2014: 3 · 2013: 1
FWCI
2.75
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed
Locations
  • Journal of Structural Biology (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
  • Research Explorer (The University of Manchester) (publishedVersion)
Topics
  • Life Sciences › Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology › Structural Biology › Advanced Electron Microscopy Techniques and Applications
  • Physical Sciences › Materials Science › Biomaterials › Collagen: Extraction and Characterization
  • Physical Sciences › Materials Science › Materials Chemistry › Enzyme Structure and Function
Keywords
extracellular matrix, collagen fibrils, 3D reconstruction, cornea, ciliary zonule, macromolecular complexes, ultrastructure
MeSH terms
Fibrillins, Animals, Cattle, Cornea, Extracellular Matrix, Microfilament Proteins, Microscopy, Electron, Tomography, X-Ray Computed, Microfibrils, Imaging, Three-Dimensional, Fibrillar Collagens

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review