Cited by 245Substance Abuse Treatment and OutcomesYouth, Drugs, and ViolenceHIV, Drug Use, Sexual Risk

Increasing MDMA use among college students: results of a national survey

Strote, Jared, Lee, Jae Eun, Wechsler, Henry·2002·Journal of Adolescent Health

Abstract

Purpose To examine the prevalence and changing patterns of ecstasy use among college students, and to determine characteristics, associated behaviors, and interests of ecstasy users.Methods The study analyzes data regarding ecstasy use and related behaviors from the 1997 and 1999 Harvard School of Public Health College Alcohol Study. This is a survey of a nationally representative sample of over 14,000 college students at 119 U.S. four-year colleges. Changes in self-reported annual ecstasy use were examined, and lifestyle and high-risk behaviors associated with Ecstasy use were identified. Data were analyzed using 2 x 2 Chi-square tests and multiple logistic regression fitted by the generalized estimating equations (GEE).Results The prevalence of past year ecstasy use rose from 2.8% to 4.7% between 1997 and 1999, an increase of 69%. This increase was observed across nearly all subgroups of student and college type. A smaller sample of ten colleges revealed that the increase continued in 2000. Ecstasy users were more likely to use marijuana, engage in binge drinking, smoke cigarettes, have multiple sexual partners, consider arts and parties as important, religion as less important, spend more times socializing with friends, and spend less times studying. Unlike other illicit drug users, ecstasy users were not academic underachievers and their satisfaction with education was not different from that of non-ecstasy users.Conclusion Ecstasy use is a high-risk behavior among college students which has increased rapidly in the past decade.

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1016/s1054-139x(01)00315-9

Cites

42 of 42 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

This paper’s full text isn’t openly available, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • Of the 112 best drug use or abuse studies, 96 (86%) reported inverse relationships and only one study found a positive relationship.

    “Of the 112 best studies, 96 (86%) reported inverse relationships [223–238] and only one study found a positive relationship [239].”

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Strote, J., Lee, J. E., & Wechsler, H.
Affiliations
  • Stanford Medicine (US)
  • Harvard University (US)
Corresponding author
Wechsler, Henry
Venue
Journal of Adolescent Health
Publisher
Elsevier BV
Published
2002-01
Volume
30
Issue
1
Pages
64-72
ISSN
1054-139X (ISSN-L)
OpenAlex
W2140302582
Cited by
245
References
42
Citations by year
2024: 1 · 2023: 42 · 2022: 2 · 2021: 4 · 2020: 4 · 2019: 2 · 2018: 2 · 2017: 7 · 2016: 7 · 2015: 8 · 2014: 5 · 2013: 5 · 2012: 6
FWCI
16.73
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed
Locations
  • Journal of Adolescent Health (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
Topics
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Epidemiology › Substance Abuse Treatment and Outcomes
  • Social Sciences › Demography › Youth, Drugs, and Violence
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Epidemiology › HIV, Drug Use, Sexual Risk
Keywords
MDMA, ecstasy use, university students, prevalence trends, high-risk behaviors, cannabis use, binge drinking, cigarette smoking, multiple sexual partners, student lifestyle, academic performance
MeSH terms
Adolescent, Adolescent Behavior, Adult, Cross-Sectional Studies, Female, Hallucinogens, Humans, Life Style, Male, Surveys and Questionnaires, Illicit Drugs, Students, United States, Universities, Prevalence, N-Methyl-3,4-methylenedioxyamphetamine, Substance-Related Disorders

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review