The DOI matches its Crossref record; 68 of the 71 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
Reliability and validity of the Western Ontario and McMaster Universities (WOMAC) Osteoarthritis Index in Italian patients with osteoarthritis of the knee
Open accessAbstract
Objective The Western Ontario and McMaster Universities (WOMAC) Osteoarthritis (OA) Index is a tested questionnaire to assess symptoms and physical functional disability in patients with OA of the knee and the hip. We adapted the WOMAC for the Italian language and tested its metric properties in 304 patients with symptomatic OA of the knee.Methods Three hundred and four consecutive patients, attending 29 rheumatologic outpatient clinic in northern, central, and southern Italy, were asked to answer two disease-specific questionnaires (WOMAC and Lequesne algofunctional index) and one generic instrument (Medical Outcomes Study SF-36 Health Survey-MOS SF-36). A sample of 258 patients was readministered the WOMAC 7-10 days after the first visit and the structured interview, which also assessed demographic and other characteristics. Internal consistency was assessed using Cronbach's alpha, reliability using intraclass correlation coefficients (ICCs), and construct and discriminant validity using Spearman's correlations, Wilcoxon rank sum test, and Kruskal-Wallis test.Results All WOMAC subscales (pain, stiffness, and physical function) were internally consistent with Cronbach's coefficient alpha of 0.91, 0.81, and 0.84, respectively. Test-retest reliability was satisfactory with ICCs of 0.86, 0.68, and 0.89, respectively. In comparison with the SF-36, the expected correlations were found when comparing items measuring similar constructs, supporting the concepts of convergent construct validity. Very high correlations were also obtained between WOMAC scores and Lequesne OA algofunctional index. WOMAC physical function, but not WOMAC stiffness and pain subscales, was weakly associated with radiological OA severity (P=0.03). Also, WOMAC pain score was inversely correlated (P=0.01) with years of formal education. Examination of discriminant validity showed that the scores on the WOMAC and SF-36 followed hypothesized patterns: the WOMAC discriminated better among subjects with varying severity of knee problems, whereas the SF-36 discriminated better among subjects with varying levels of self-reported health status and comorbidity.Conclusion The Italian version of WOMAC is a reliable and valid instrument for evaluating the severity of OA of the knee, with metric properties in agreement with the original, widely used version.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Claims other papers make about this one
Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?
The cited source says what the claim attributes to it.
In the citing paper
“The Italian translation of the WOMAC showed adequate internal consistency, test-retest reliability, and construct validity.25”
From Acceptance and commitment therapy for prevention of chronic pain after total knee arthroplasty. (2026) · cites this paper as [25]
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cites
Coefficient Alpha and the Internal Structure of Tests
Cronbach, L. J. (1951) · Psychometrika · doi:10.1007/bf02310555 · Cited by 43,931
(1992) · PubMed · Cited by 33,716
The MOS 36-ltem Short-Form Health Survey (SF-36): I. Conceptual Framework and Item Selection
Ware, J. E., & Sherbourne, C. D. (1992) · Medical Care · doi:10.1097/00005650-199206000-00002 · Cited by 30,033
Psychometric theory (2nd ed.).
Sitgreaves, R. (1979) · Contemporary Psychology · doi:10.1037/018882 · Cited by 14,384
Radiological Assessment of Osteo-Arthrosis
Kellgren, J., & Lawrence, J. S. (1957) · Annals of the Rheumatic Diseases · doi:10.1136/ard.16.4.494 · Cited by 12,472
Health Measurement Scales: A Practical Guide to Their Development and Use
Streiner, D. L., Norman, G. R., & Cairney, J. (1989) · Cited by 9,595
Altman, R., Asch, E., Bloch, D., Bole, G., Borenstein, D., Brandt, K., Christy, W., Cooke, T. D., Greenwald, R., Hochberg, M., et al. (1986) · Arthritis & Rheumatism · doi:10.1002/art.1780290816 · Cited by 6,777
The Sickness Impact Profile: Development and Final Revision of a Health Status Measure
Bergner, M., Bobbitt, R. A., Carter, W. B., & Gilson, B. S. (1981) · Medical Care · doi:10.1097/00005650-198108000-00001 · Cited by 4,619
Measuring Health: A Guide to Rating Scales and Questionnaires
McDowell, I., & Newell, C. (1987) · Cited by 4,207
(1994) · Medical Entomology and Zoology · Cited by 4,156
Research works printed but not linked: 3
- Leardini, 2001, A multicentric study of annual costs of knee osteoarthritis in Italy, Arthritis Rheum, 44, S313
- Lequesne, 1998, Comparison between the WOMAC and the Lequesne indices in patients with knee and hip osteoarthritis, Osteoarthritis Cartilage, 6, 141
- Stuki, 1996, Evaluation of a German version of the WOMAC osteoarthritis index, Z Rheumatol, 55, 40
Cited by
Sorted by citations
Items 201–300 of 331
Barone, G., Zinno, R., Pinelli, E., PAIR Study Group, Benvenuti, F., & Bragonzoni, L. (2021) · International Journal of Environmental Research and Public Health · doi:10.3390/ijerph18136732 · Cited by 5
“Validity and reliability of the instrument have also been demonstrated for the Italian version [82].”
MethodKim, N., Kim, S. Y., Kim, S., Lee, J. M., Kim, S. K., Park, M.-H., Kim, K.-H., Oh, M., Son, C., Jung, I. C., et al. (2023) · Frontiers in Pharmacology · doi:10.3389/fphar.2023.1114410 · Cited by 5
“The primary efficacy assessment employed pain and osteoarthritis-related parameters; VAS for knee joint pain using a 100 mm drawing bar (0 and 100 indicate ‘no pain’ and ‘worst possible, unbearable pain’, respectively) and Western Ontario and the McMaster Universities Osteoarthritis (WOMAC) score evaluating pain, stif…”
MethodJelinek, T., Young, A., Jones, G., Magana, K., Magee, T., Ward, S., Modi, J., Fitzgerald, K., Hughes, G. K., Ford, A. I., et al. (2024) · Osteoarthritis and Cartilage · doi:10.1016/j.joca.2024.01.006 · Cited by 5
Bishnoi, A., Hu, Y., & Hernandez, M. E. (2024) · Frontiers in Aging Neuroscience · doi:10.3389/fnagi.2024.1403185 · Cited by 5
Martini, D., Guareschi, C., Biasini, B., Bedogni, G., Galli, C., Angelino, D., Marchi, L., Zavaroni, I., Pruneti, C. A., Ventura, M., et al. (2017) · PharmaNutrition · doi:10.1016/j.phanu.2017.12.001 · Cited by 5
D’Elicio, D., Attanasio, M., Ruffo, G., Mogoş, Ş., Ursino, N., D’Ambrosi, R., & Parente, F. (2020) · Knee Surgery Sports Traumatology Arthroscopy · doi:10.1007/s00167-020-05991-w · Cited by 5
Larghi, M. M., Grassi, M., Faugno, L., Placenza, E., Rampulla, C., & Manzotti, A. (2020) · Acta bio-medica dell'Ateneo parmense/Acta biomedica · doi:10.23750/abm.v91i4.10275 · Cited by 5
Hossain, K., Kabir, F., Jahan, S., Rahman, E., Hossain, K. M. A., Kormoker, A., Islam, M. Z., Hossain, M. K., Rikti, J. F., Khan, A. H., et al. (2025) · BMJ Open Sport & Exercise Medicine · doi:10.1136/bmjsem-2025-002577 · Cited by 4
Steultjens, M. P. M., Stolwijk-Swüste, J. M., Roorda, L. D., Dallmeijer, A. J., van Dijk, G. M., Post, B., Dekker, J., & the CARPA Study Group (2012) · Disability and Rehabilitation · doi:10.3109/09638288.2011.645110 · Cited by 4
Mendoza, S., Puente, R., Illnait, J., Más, R., López, E., Carbajal, D., Fernández, L., Fernández, J. C., Mesa, M., Reyes, P., et al. (2017) · Revista de la Facultad de Ciencias Médicas de Córdoba · doi:10.31053/1853.0605.v74.n2.14479 · Cited by 4
Zagari, M. C., Chiarello, P., Iuliano, S., D’Antona, L., Rocca, V., Colao, E., Perrotti, N., Greco, F., Iuliano, R., & Aversa, A. (2022) · Genes · doi:10.3390/genes14010080 · Cited by 4
“Therefore, we evaluated the effect of burosumab on these endpoints using self-reported measures (WOMAC Index and BPI) together with physical assessments (6MWT and HGS).”
MethodCha, Y., Yoon, H., Park, C., & You, S. H. (2023) · Journal of Back and Musculoskeletal Rehabilitation · doi:10.3233/bmr-220182 · Cited by 4
Study of the Reliability and Validity of the WOMAC Index in Patients with Total Knee Replacement
Jo, H., Kim, K., & Im, S.-C. (2023) · Journal of the Korean Society of Physical Medicine · doi:10.13066/kspm.2023.18.2.93 · Cited by 4
Kniegelenkschmerzen bei Arthrosezeichen
Bender, T. T. A., Marinova, M., Radbruch, L., Conrad, R., Jobst, D., & Mücke, M. (2017) · Der Schmerz · doi:10.1007/s00482-017-0199-9 · Cited by 4
Aiyegbusi, A., Ogunfowodu, O., & Akinbo, S. (2018) · Journal of Clinical Sciences · doi:10.4103/jcls.jcls_43_17 · Cited by 4
Fan, T., Li, J., Zeng, M., Wang, X., Ruan, G., Cao, P., Zhang, Y., Chen, T., Chen, S., Ou, Q., et al. (2022) · Research Square · doi:10.21203/rs.3.rs-1663778/v1 · Cited by 4
Ma, J., Guo, G., Yue, H., Xie, C., Xie, F., Chen, Z., Gu, Y., Zhang, S., Fang, M., & Yao, F. (2024) · BMJ Open · doi:10.1136/bmjopen-2023-083440 · Cited by 3
Cofano, E., Familiari, F., Mori, T., Mercurio, M., Vescio, A., Giorgio, A., Gasparini, G., & Calafiore, G. (2025) · Applied Sciences · doi:10.3390/app15094937 · Cited by 3
Bishnoi, A., Hu, Y., & Hernandez, M. E. (2025) · Frontiers in Aging Neuroscience · doi:10.3389/fnagi.2025.1583447 · Cited by 3
Zhong, Z., Guo, W., Gu, Q., Pang, T., Li, L., & Hao, A. (2025) · BMC Musculoskeletal Disorders · doi:10.1186/s12891-025-08876-6 · Cited by 3
“Higher scores in the Lysholm, International Knee Documentation Committee, and Cincinnati scales indicate better knee function, [67] while a lower score on the Western Ontario and McMaster scale suggests better knee function [68].”
Zhao, Y., Zhang, Y., Liu, K., Chai, Y., Yan, H., Lin, F., Zhan, H., Zheng, Y., & Yuan, W.-A. (2025) · Clinical Rheumatology · doi:10.1007/s10067-025-07572-z · Cited by 3
Cimatti, P., Rocchi, M., Dallari, B., Piccolo, N. D., Mazzotta, A., & Dallari, D. (2025) · Journal of Experimental Orthopaedics · doi:10.1002/jeo2.70528 · Cited by 3
“Baseline assessments, including medical history and preoperative functional status (Western Ontario and McMaster Universities Osteoarthritis Index [WOMAC] and Harris hip score [HHS]), were recorded at the pre ‐ admission visit [8, 30, 34].”
Lettner, J., Drews, N., Salzmann, M., Ramadanov, N., & Prill, R. (2026) · Indian Journal of Orthopaedics · doi:10.1007/s43465-025-01688-9 · Cited by 3
Cangiano, B., Corbetta, M., Premoli, C., Soranna, D., Vitale, G., Grottoli, S., Cambria, V., Maffei, P., Dassie, F., Cannavò, S., et al. (2026) · European Journal of Endocrinology · doi:10.1093/ejendo/lvag047 · Cited by 3
Xue, K., Wu, J., Bao, J. Q., Zhao, H., Zhao, Y., Lu, Y., Xu, Q., & Huang, C. (2024) · Journal of Acupuncture and Tuina Science · doi:10.1007/s11726-024-1420-x · Cited by 3
Howard, K. J., Ellis, H. B., Wang, J., GRUEN, J. K. V. D., & Bucholz, R. W. (2012) · Journal of Applied Biobehavioral Research · doi:10.1111/j.1751-9861.2012.00079.x · Cited by 3
Varun, G. B. S., Kumar, V., Lavadi, R. S., & Muralidhar, N. (2018) · International Journal of Orthopaedics Sciences · doi:10.22271/ortho.2018.v4.i1p.153 · Cited by 3
“The Western Ontario and McMaster Universities Arthritis score (WOMAC) was also utilized ([10]).”
MethodCorrelation of synovial tissue protein abundance with menopause in osteoarthritis.
Xiao, Y., Fu, Z., Ren, Q., Wang, S., Yin, S., & Liu, J. L. (2022) · PubMed Central · Cited by 3
Guida, S., Vitale, J. A., Gianola, S., Castellini, G., Swinnen, E., Beckwée, D., Gelfi, C., Torretta, E., & Mangiavini, L. (2023) · BMJ Open · doi:10.1136/bmjopen-2023-073163 · Cited by 3
“Based on the existing literature, 14 we expected to observe an effect size of 0.8 in WOMAC (primary outcome) between groups at the end of the tele-prehabilitation programme.”
MethodInfluentialEffect of Habbe Gule Aakh in osteoarthritis knee: A randomised clinical trail
Begum, M., Quamri, M. A., & Habibullah, V. (2024) · International Journal of Orthopaedics Sciences · doi:10.22271/ortho.2024.v10.i2a.3530 · Cited by 3
Chen, T., He, Y. T., Xia, S., Zhou, F., Yuan, X., & Liu, X. (2024) · BMJ Open · doi:10.1136/bmjopen-2023-082108 · Cited by 3
Jia, W., Zhang, Y., Wang, T., Liu, C., Tu, J., Shi, G., Cai, L., Yang, J., & Huang, G. (2024) · Combinatorial Chemistry & High Throughput Screening · doi:10.2174/0113862073303471240805061026 · Cited by 3
“To assess pain, stiffness, and function in patients with KOA, the researchers used the Western Ontario and McMaster Universities Osteoarthritis Index (WOMAC) and the numerical rating scale (NRS) [24].”
Longo, U. G., Campi, S., Marino, M., Greco, A., Piergentili, I., Salvatore, S. D., Ammendolia, A., d’Hooghe, P. P. R. N., Alessandro de, S. I. R. E., & Papalia, R. (2025) · Journal of Back and Musculoskeletal Rehabilitation · doi:10.1177/10538127251336743 · Cited by 3
Harari, R. E., Smith, S. E., Bahouth, S. M., Lo, L., Sury, M., Yin, M., Schaefer, L. F., Wells, W. M., Collins, J. E., & Duryea, J. (2025) · Osteoarthritis and Cartilage Open · doi:10.1016/j.ocarto.2026.100832 · Cited by 3
“• These groups were derived from longitudinal changes in medial tibiofemoral joint space width (JSW) and Western Ontario and McMaster Universities Osteoarthritis Index (WOMAC) pain scores [23].”
The role of cam morphology in the progression of radiographic hip osteoarthritis
Sheng‐Kai, K., Kao, P., Yong, S., & Chen, K. (2023) · International Journal of Rheumatic Diseases · doi:10.1111/1756-185x.14587 · Cited by 3
Acceptance and commitment therapy for prevention of chronic pain after total knee arthroplasty.
Giusti, E. M., Castelnuovo, G., Manna, C., Varallo, G., Cattivelli, R., Petrachi, B. V., Stramba-Badiale, M., & Spatola, C. A. M. (2026) · Pain Medicine · doi:10.1093/pm/pnaf145 · Cited by 2
Ünüvar, B. S., Tüfekçi, O., Gerçek, H., Torlak, M. S., & Erbas, O. (2024) · Journal of Back and Musculoskeletal Rehabilitation · doi:10.3233/bmr-230373 · Cited by 2
Bertugli, E., Marcovigi, A., Grandi, G., & Catani, F. (2025) · Archives of Orthopaedic and Trauma Surgery · doi:10.1007/s00402-025-05911-y · Cited by 2
Huang, Z., Mu, F., Wang, W., Chen, F., Zhang, H., & Zhang, Z. (2025) · Journal of Orthopaedic Surgery and Research · doi:10.1186/s13018-025-06181-5 · Cited by 2
Dinesh, C., Singh, D., & Manikandarajan, A. (2020) · International Journal of Orthopaedics Sciences · doi:10.22271/ortho.2020.v6.i4d.2339 · Cited by 2
López-Garrido, Á., González-Gutiérrez, M. D., & Ibáñez‐Vera, A. J. (2022) · Fisioterapia · doi:10.1016/j.ft.2022.06.004 · Cited by 2
Staged replacement of both hips and both knees in patients with rheumatoid arthritis
Cao, J., Wang, W.-Q., Feng, W., Xu, H., Wang, D., & Zhou, Z. (2023) · BMC Musculoskeletal Disorders · doi:10.1186/s12891-023-06282-4 · Cited by 2
Zhang, S., Ma, H., Wang, L., Wang, M., Li, B., & Liu, J. L. (2023) · BMJ Open · doi:10.1136/bmjopen-2023-073058 · Cited by 2
“32 33 Furthermore, research shows that the electronic WOMAC scoring form completed on smartphones is closely consistent with the paper version, with no significant difference.”
Zeng, P., Zhao, B., Li, M., Wang, Y., Cai, G., Chen, R., Chen, L., & Liu, J. (2024) · Brain and Behavior · doi:10.1002/brb3.70042 · Cited by 2
“…the WOMAC scale has high reliability for pain, stiffness, and physical functionat.91,.81, and.84, respectively,anddiscriminantvaliditytests indicated that the WOMAC scale better distinguishes between participants with different levels of knee joint issues (Salaffi et al., 2003).”
Atan, T., Bildik, Y. E., Demir, Y., Güzelküçük, Ü., & Tan, A. K. (2024) · Irish Journal of Medical Science (1971 -) · doi:10.1007/s11845-024-03836-w · Cited by 5
Exploration of combined factors related to quality of life after knee replacement surgery
Santoh, K., Shigetoh, H., Yamano, H., Torizawa, K., Takasaki, H., & Uritani, D. (2025) · PLoS ONE · doi:10.1371/journal.pone.0323007 · Cited by 2
“…confirmed its validity by comparing the WOMAC subscale with the Short Form-36 subscale and reported that knee-joint symptoms tended to worsen in patients with KOA exhibiting lower QOL, suggesting that the WOMAC is a valid questionnaire that captures knee-joint symptoms in patients with KOA [23].”
InfluentialNon-arthritic Hip Score: translation, cultural adaptation and validation of the Italian version
PANICO, M., Galeoto, G., Bartoli, V., Valentino, J., Berardi, A., Tofani, M., & Magnifica, F. (2020) · Minerva Orthopedics · doi:10.23736/s0394-3410.20.03981-8 · Cited by 2
Stommel, G., Schuehlein, S., Schuehlein, K.-H., & Rainsford, K. D. (2015) · Progress in drug research · doi:10.1007/978-3-0348-0927-6_2 · Cited by 2
“WOMAC has been widely used as a health status instrument to determine outcomes from therapy with a wide variety of pharmacological agents, physical treatments and procedures used to treat osteoarthritis including that in the knee (Bellamy 2005; Lequesne and Maheu 2003; Salaffi et al. 2003, 2005).”
MethodPuente, R., Illnait, J., Más, R., Mendoza, S., Carbajal, D., Fernández, J. C., Mesa, M., & Prieto, Y. (2014) · Cited by 2
The Effect of Mechanical Traction on Pain and Physical Function in Patients With Knee Osteoarthritis
Lee, N.-Y., Kwon, C.-S., & Kim, S.-Y. (2015) · Physical Therapy Korea · doi:10.12674/ptk.2015.22.3.023 · Cited by 2
Walters, R., Kasik, J., Ettel, C., & Ortiz, R. (2022) · The Open Orthopaedics Journal · doi:10.2174/18743250-v16-e221130-2022-8 · Cited by 2
“The WOMAC (Western Ontario and McMaster Universities Arthritis Index) is a more detailed questionnaire that quantifies patient pain, stiffness, and physical function [64, 65].”
BackgroundWiedermann, C. J., Marino, P., van der Zee‐Neuen, A., Mastrobuono, I., Mahlknecht, A., Barbieri, V., Wildburger, S., Fuchs, J., Capici, A., Piccoliori, G., et al. (2023) · Methods and Protocols · doi:10.3390/mps6020028 · Cited by 2
“The Western Ontario and McMaster Universities (WOMAC) OA index subscale will be used in its Italian [51] and German [52] versions to assess physical function.”
MethodWu, C.-S., Cheng, H.-Y., Hsu, P.-F., Kao, Y.-H., & Kuo, S. M. (2017) · Journal of Medical and Biological Engineering · doi:10.1007/s40846-017-0221-9 · Cited by 2
Nontraumatic Knee Complaints in Adults in General Practice
Belo, J. N. (2009) · RePub (Erasmus University Rotterdam) · Cited by 2
Xue, K., Wang, L., Hang, M., Bao, J. Q., Zhao, Y., Lu, Y., Xu, Q., Huang, C., & Wu, J. (2023) · Research Square · doi:10.21203/rs.3.rs-3174965/v1 · Cited by 2
Musbahi, O., Pouris, K., Hadjixenophontos, S., Al-Saadawi, A., Soteriou, I., Cobb, J. P., & Jones, G. G. (2025) · World Journal of Methodology · doi:10.5662/wjm.v15.i4.105493 · Cited by 1
Hanlon, S. L., Miller, M. J., Swink, L. A., Hoffman, R. M., Kline, P. W., & Christiansen, C. L. (2025) · PM&R · doi:10.1002/pmrj.13439 · Cited by 1
“2,6,12,15,19,27 Latent constructs were composed based on variables collected for the purpose of the primary study.”
Li, C. (2025) · American Journal of Translational Research · doi:10.62347/tuyg1784 · Cited by 1
Nagy-Finna, T.-C., Faragó, L.-A., Kikeli, P.-I., Szövérfi, E.-L., Lukács, H., Engi, K., Székely, J., Sólyom, Á., & Nagy, E. E. (2024) · Orvostudományi Értesítö · doi:10.2478/orvtudert-2024-0001 · Cited by 1
Wang, Y., Cai, G., Li, M., Chen, R., Zeng, P., Zhao, B., Tao, J., & Liu, J. (2025) · Communications Medicine · doi:10.1038/s43856-025-01104-1 · Cited by 1
Sharma, D., Saini, V., Srivastav, A. K., & Samuel, A. J. (2025) · Lasers in Medical Science · doi:10.1007/s10103-025-04613-6 · Cited by 3
Piano, L., Brossa, C., Gioia, L. F., Occhionero, A., Dell’Isola, A., & Trucco, M. (2025) · Archives of Physiotherapy · doi:10.33393/aop.2025.3612 · Cited by 1
Balato, G., Ascione, T., Festa, E., Mauro, D. D., Gennaro, D. D., Rosa, D., & Mariconda, M. (2026) · Journal of Orthopaedics and Traumatology · doi:10.1186/s10195-026-00915-9 · Cited by 1
Nguyen, L. T., Nguyen, K. T., Dao, L. T. M., Hoang, V. H., Phan, T. T. K., Dinh, N. H., Nguyen, H. T., Nguyen, A. T. P., Nguyen, T. T. N., Ho, T. T. K., et al. (2026) · EBioMedicine · doi:10.1016/j.ebiom.2026.106268 · Cited by 1
“Knee pain, stiffness, and physical function were assessed using the Western Ontario and McMaster Universities Osteoarthritis Index (WOMAC), 34 a validated 24-item questionnaire comprising three subscales: pain (5 items), stiffness (2 items), and physical function (17 items).”
Nematshahi, M., mirhamidi, M., Farkhani, E. M., Farahmand, S. K., Solati, S., Tehrani, M. V., & Bahrami-Taghanaki, H. (2026) · Clinical Rheumatology · doi:10.1007/s10067-026-08197-6 · Cited by 1
Can we accurately predict outcome after hip and knee replacement?
Brander, V. A., Brander, K., & Stulberg, S. D. (2010) · Current Orthopaedic Practice · doi:10.1097/bco.0b013e3181d0cf69 · Cited by 1
Gökşen, A., Can, F., Taş, S., & Korkusuz, F. (2020) · Türk fizyoterapi ve rehabilitasyon dergisi · doi:10.21653/tjpr.515870 · Cited by 1
Babu, P. A., SEKHAR, A. C., & SUJIN, S. (2023) · International Journal of Pharmacy and Pharmaceutical Sciences · doi:10.22159/ijpps.2023v15i6.48005 · Cited by 1
Ortiz, H. A. D. L. B., Leiva, C. A., Lillo, C. A., Álvarez, D. C., & Pizarro, B. C. (2024) · Physiotherapy Quarterly · doi:10.5114/pq/163383 · Cited by 1
Lasisi, K., Onigbinde, A. T., Ayinla, S. C., Ayeni, O. E., Kekere, T. F., Awotipe, A., Borode, A. O., Ayodeji, A. O., Adeyemi, T., Adewuni, A. S., et al. (2024) · European Journal of Medical and Health Research · doi:10.59324/ejmhr.2024.2(4).25 · Cited by 1
Lin, Q., Yu, D., Lu, T., Zhang, Y., Chen, X., Qin, J., & Wu, F. (2025) · BMJ Open · doi:10.1136/bmjopen-2024-092689 · Cited by 1
Monticone, M., Frigau, L., Sconza, C., Foti, C., Molà, F., & Respizzi, S. (2019) · International Journal of Statistics in Medical Research · doi:10.6000/1929-6029.2019.08.02 · Cited by 1
Pipino, G., Borghi, R., Vaccarisi, D. C., MARDONES, R. M., Giardini, P., Via, A. G., & Indelli, P. F. (2021) · Journal of Clinical Medical Research · doi:10.46889/jcmr.2021.2107 · Cited by 1
“Clinical evaluation was performed using the VAS (Visual Analogue Scale) and the WOMAC (Western Ontario and McMaster Universities Osteoarthritis Index) questionnaires consisting of 3 subscales: Pain, Stiffness, and Physical Function [9,10].”
MethodSaini, S., Goyal, M., & Samuel, A. J. (2021) · Revista Pesquisa em Fisioterapia · doi:10.17267/2238-2704rpf.v11i2.3578 · Cited by 1
Dixit, M. (2020) · Indian Journal of Public Health Research & Development · doi:10.37506/ijphrd.v11i5.9420 · Cited by 1
“Hence, Group A shows significant improvement in pain reduction than Group B. Table 2: Comparison of mean difference in Goniometer for ROM score in two groups Student’s unpaired t test: Group N Mean Std. Deviation Std. Error Mean t-value Group A 36 16.38 8.34 1.39 2.32 P=0.023, SGroup B 36 12.25 6.64 1.10 Table 2 shows…”
BackgroundInfluentialManagement of a rare intra-articular fracture of the lateral femoral condyle: case report.
Compagnoni, R., Ricci, M., Pedrini, F. A., Ferrua, P., Menon, A., & Randelli, P. S. (2021) · Acta bio-medica dell'Ateneo parmense/Acta biomedica · doi:10.23750/abm.v92is1.11094 · Cited by 1
“it included the Numeric Rating Scale (NRS) for pain (11), the International Knee Documentation Committee (IKDC) subjective score (12) and the Western Ontario and McMaster Universities Arthritis Index (WOMAC) (13).”
MethodRahman, A. N., Herman, H., Kriswanto, E., Faried, A., & Nasser, M. K. (2022) · Journal of Pain Research · doi:10.2147/jpr.s357284 · Cited by 1
“result points were divided into four groups based on the severity: mild (0–24 points), moderate (25–48 points), severe (49–72 points), and very severe (73–96 points).(12)”
BackgroundJoseph, D. C. (2023) · Annals of Physiotherapy & Occupational Therapy · doi:10.23880/aphot-16000251 · Cited by 1
Salaffi, F., Stancati, A., Carotti, M., Lorenzetti, R., & Grassi, W. (2005) · Cited by 1
Ortiz, H. A. D. L. B., & Chamorro-Lange, C. (2026) · Journal of Clinical Medicine · doi:10.3390/jcm15176635 · Cited by 1
“These scales capture different constructs—AKPS assesses function related to anterior knee pain, where higher scores indicate better function, and WOMAC assesses disability, where improvements are reflected by lower scores [25,26]—and their combination may increase heterogeneity and indirectness.”
Patient-reported Outcome Measures—Framework, Psychometrics, and Uses
Davis, D. R. (2016) · Orthopaedic Section, APTA, Inc. eBooks · doi:10.17832/isc.2016.26.1.1
Taşdemir, Z., & GÜZEL, Ş. E. (2019) · Balıkesir Medical Journal · doi:10.33716/bmedj.519418
Lal, H., Singh, H., Sandhu, K. S., & Sehgal, V. K. (2019) · International Journal of Medical and Dental Sciences · doi:10.18311/ijmds/2019/23417
“[12] Other studies have also shown that pain was significantly reduced in patient taking ibuprofen.[13,14] Warlhom in 2003 conducted a double blind randomized clinical trial between rosehip and placebo in 100 patients.”
BackgroundFunctional Outcome of Early Knee Osteoarthritis Treated with Platelet Rich Plasma
Kumar, V., Vishal, R., & Pillai, V. R. (2020) · International Journal of Contemporary Medical Research [IJCMR] · doi:10.21276/ijcmr.2020.7.1.2
Melyanian, B., Niki, Z., & Rezaeian, Z. S. (2016) · DOAJ (DOAJ: Directory of Open Access Journals) · doi:10.22122/jrrs.v11i6.2552
Mishra, A., & Shrivastava, V. (2020) · Journal of Medical and Scientific Research · doi:10.17727/jmsr.2020/8-20
“The WOMAC consists of 24 items, rated on a five point Likert scale, and divided into 3 sub-scales [10, 11]: Pain (5 items), stiffness (2 items), and physical function (17 items).”
BackgroundMethodFatigue and Pain Measurements in Systemic Lupus Erythematosus
Ajrawat, P., Strand, V., Matsos, M. P., Simon, L. S., & Touma, Z. (2021) · Springer eBooks · doi:10.1007/978-3-030-73303-2_15
Grassi, M., Larghi, M. M., Placenza, E., Faugno, L., Rampulla, C., & Manzotti, A. (2020) · Hong Kong Journal of Orthopaedic Research · doi:10.37515/ortho.8231.3302
Baidya, O. (2018) · Orthopedics and Rheumatology Open Access Journal · doi:10.19080/oroaj.2018.10.555799
“All the scales (WOMAC, ICOAP, KOOS, KOOS-PS, SF-36, SF-12 and Lysholm scale) reviewed in this study are having satisfactory reliability and validity for the original English version [8,13,15,20].”
BackgroundMethod2003 Volume Contents, Author and Keyword Indexes
(2003) · Osteoarthritis and Cartilage · doi:10.1016/s1063-4584(03)00283-8
Howat, T. (2013) · Unitec Research Bank (Unitec Institute of Technology)
Impact of Functional Task Training on Gait Parameter of OA Knee
Kirupa, K., Paul, J., Harikrishnan, N., & Manoj Abraham, M. (2023) · International journal of human movement and sports sciences · doi:10.13189/saj.2023.110203
Barni, L., Carrasco-Vega, E., Martín‐Martín, J., Galli, M., Freddolini, M., Merchán-Baeza, J. A., & González‐Sánchez, M. (2023) · Research Square · doi:10.21203/rs.3.rs-3078112/v1
Rani, N., Verma, S., Das, K., Pramanick, P., & Chauhan, K. (2023) · International Journal for Research in Applied Science and Engineering Technology · doi:10.22214/ijraset.2023.55301
ปจจยทสมพนธกบขอจำกดในการทำกจกรรมของผสงอายหลงผาตดเปลยนขอเขาเทยม
คําวะรัตน์, พ., & สาสัตย์, ศ. (2017) · doi:10.58837/chula.the.2017.1102
Ma, J., Guo, G., Yue, H., Xie, C., Xie, F., Chen, Z., Gu, Y., Zhang, S., Fang, M., & Yao, F. (2023) · Research Square · doi:10.21203/rs.3.rs-3335099/v1
Chen, T., Su, H., Gao, Q., Zhou, F., Yuan, X., & Liu, X. (2023) · Research Square · doi:10.21203/rs.3.rs-3490435/v1
Ortiz, H. A. D. L. B., Muñoz, S. C., Lagos, E. A., Guajardo, K. D., & Villa, V. J. (2024) · Physiotherapy Quarterly · doi:10.5114/pq.2024.135417
Metadata
- Authors
- Salaffi, F., Leardini, G., Canesi, B., Mannoni, A., Fioravanti, A., Caporali, R., Lapadula, G., & Punzi, L.
- Affiliations
- Azienda Socio Sanitaria Territoriale Grande Ospedale Metropolitano Niguarda (IT)
- Azienda Sanitaria di Firenze (IT)
- University of Siena (IT)
- University of Pavia (IT)
- Azienda Universitaria Ospedaliera Consorziale - Policlinico Bari (IT)
- University of Padua (IT)
- Corresponding author
- Salaffi, F
- Venue
- Osteoarthritis and Cartilage
- Publisher
- Elsevier BV
- Published
- 2003-08
- Volume
- 11
- Issue
- 8
- Pages
- 551-560
- ISSN
- 1063-4584 (ISSN-L)
- OpenAlex
- W2087139148
- Cited by
- 331
- References
- 71
- Citations by year
- 2026: 22 · 2025: 33 · 2024: 28 · 2023: 33 · 2022: 25 · 2021: 16 · 2020: 23 · 2019: 13 · 2018: 18 · 2017: 16 · 2016: 10 · 2015: 12 · 2014: 16 · 2013: 6 · 2012: 11
- FWCI
- 3.22
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- bronze
- doi.org
- Licence
- Locations
- Osteoarthritis and Cartilage (publishedVersion)
- PubMed (publishedVersion)
- Archivio Istituzionale della Ricerca (Universita Degli Studi Di Milano) (submittedVersion, other-oa)
- IRIS UNIMORE (University of Modena and Reggio Emilia) (submittedVersion, cc-by)
- Università Politecnica delle Marche (Università Politecnica delle Marche) (submittedVersion)
- Topics
- Health Sciences › Health Professions › Physical Therapy, Sports Therapy and Rehabilitation › Musculoskeletal pain and rehabilitation
- Health Sciences › Medicine › Rheumatology › Osteoarthritis Treatment and Mechanisms
- Health Sciences › Medicine › Surgery › Total Knee Arthroplasty Outcomes
- Keywords
- knee osteoarthritis, questionnaire reliability, construct validity, test-retest reliability, SF-36, Lequesne algofunctional index, pain, stiffness, physical function, radiographic severity, educational attainment, health status, comorbidities, patient-reported outcomes, cross-cultural adaptation, Italy, North America
- MeSH terms
- Aged, Aged, 80 and over, Cross-Sectional Studies, Disability Evaluation, Female, Humans, Italy, Male, Middle Aged, Pain, Surveys and Questionnaires, Reproducibility of Results, Cohort Studies, Comorbidity, Muscle, Skeletal, Osteoarthritis, Knee
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review