Student or educator? Sign up with your school email and get 6 months of Pro free.
Cited by 164

The DOI matches its Crossref record; 2 of the 2 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.

A health status assessment of the impact of weight loss following Roux-en-Y gastric bypass for clinically severe obesity

Choban, Patricia S, Onyejekwe, Jacqueline, Burge, Jean C, Flancbaum, Louis·1999·Journal of the American College of Surgeons

Abstract

BACKGROUND: The field of "medical outcomes" emphasizes effects of medical treatments on quality of life as seen from the patient's perspective. The increasing incidence of obesity has had tremendous impact on the physical, psychological, social, and economic health of our nation with important longterm implications for the development of future social and health care policies. This study evaluated the effects of clinically severe obesity on overall health status measured in a standardized fashion and the impact of durable weight loss achieved through surgical intervention. STUDY DESIGN: Patients scheduled for Roux-en-Y gastric bypass for treatment of obesity were prospectively evaluated. At the preoperative visit, each patient completed Short Form 36 (SF-36). Postoperatively, patients were again asked to complete SF-36, in person or through a telephone interview at an interim point (3 to 12 months) and after their weight had reached a plateau (>18 months). RESULTS: The mean body mass index (BMI) was 51+/-10 kg/m2 preoperatively (range 38 to 85 kg/m2). Mean BMI was 45+/-10 kg/m2 (range 33 to 78 kg/m2) at the interim point and 35+/-8 kg/m2 (range 28 to 55 kg/m2) at plateau. The weight change for the group was from 306+/-8 lb (138+/-4 kg) preoperatively to 211+/-55 lb (96+/-25 kg) at the plateau, with the average percent of excess body weight lost being 63+/-23% at the plateau. Preoperatively, patients with clinically severe obesity scored significantly lower than the normal population in all areas except Role Activities (Emotional Factors). At the plateau period, patients demonstrated significant improvement in limitations in all areas compared with preoperative values and scores were the same as (Physical Activities, Role Activities [Physical Factors], General Mental Health, General Health Perceptions), or significantly better than (Social Functioning, Role Activities [Emotional Factors], Bodily Pain, Vitality), the national "normal" population. CONCLUSION: Clinically severe obesity is a chronic disabling disease that results in significantly decreased health status in seven of the eight areas measured by SF-36. This disability resolves with successful weight reduction. In some areas, function even surpasses the national "normal" population. Surgical treatment of clinically severe obesity has a profoundly positive impact on patients' perception of their health status.

Overview

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1016/s1072-7515(99)00030-7

Cites

2 of 2 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Verification

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Citations

Cited by

See all 164

Metadata

Authors
Choban, P. S., Onyejekwe, J., Burge, J. C., & Flancbaum, L.
Venue
Journal of the American College of Surgeons
Published
1999-05
Volume
188
Issue
5
Pages
491-497
ISSN
1072-7515 (ISSN-L)
OpenAlex
W2134664893
Cited by
164
References
2
FWCI
9.08
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review

How to cite

Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.

This page
CoChat. (2026). Citation check: A health status assessment of the impact of weight loss following Roux-en-Y gastric bypass for clinically severe obesity. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1016/s1072-7515(99)00030-7
The paper
Choban, P. S., Onyejekwe, J., Burge, J. C., & Flancbaum, L. (1999). A health status assessment of the impact of weight loss following Roux-en-Y gastric bypass for clinically severe obesity. Journal of the American College of Surgeons. https://doi.org/10.1016/s1072-7515(99)00030-7

Data sources

Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.

Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).

Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.