Student or educator? Sign up with your school email and get 6 months of Pro free.
Cited by 391

The DOI matches its Crossref record; 35 of the 35 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.

A ribozyme and a catalytic DNA with peroxidase activity: active sites versus cofactor-binding sites

Open access
Travascio, Paola, Bennet, Andrew J, Wang, Dennis Y, Sen, Dipankar·1999·Chemistry & Biology

Abstract

BACKGROUND An 18-nucleotide DNA oligomer, PS2.M, derived using an in vitro selection method was previously reported to bind hemin (Fe(III)-protoporphyrinIX) with submicromolar affinity. The DNA-hemin complex exhibited DNA-enhanced peroxidative activity. PS2. M is guanine-rich and requires potassium ions to fold to its active conformation, consistent with its forming a guanine-quaduplex. In investigating the specific catalytic features of PS2.M we tested the peroxidative properties of its RNA version (rPS2.M) as well as that of an unrelated DNA guanine-quadruplex, OXY4. RESULTS The hemin-binding affinity of rPS2.M was found to be 30-fold weaker than that of PS2.M. The UV-visible spectra and kinetics of enzymatic peroxidation of the RNA-hemin complex, however, were nearly identical to those of its DNA counterpart. Both displayed peroxidase activity substantially greater than those of heme proteins such as catalase and Fe(III)-myoglobin. Kinetic analysis suggested that PS2. M and rPS2.M catalyzed the breakdown of the hemin-hydrogen peroxide covalent complex to products. The hemin complex of folded OXY4 (which bound hemin as strongly as did rPS2.M) had a distinct absorption spectrum and only a minor peroxidase activity above the background level. CONCLUSIONS The results indicated that it is possible for RNA and DNA of the same sequence to fold to form comparable cofactor-binding sites, and to show comparable catalytic behavior. The results further suggest that only a subset of cofactor-binding sites formed within folded nucleic acids might be able to function as active sites, by providing the appropriate chemical environments for catalysis.

Overview

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1016/s1074-5521(99)80125-2

Cites

35 of 35 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Verification

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Citations

Cites

Show all 35 references

Cited by

See all 391

Metadata

Authors
Travascio, P., Bennet, A. J., Wang, D. Y., & Sen, D.
Venue
Chemistry & Biology
Publisher
Elsevier BV
Published
1999-11
Volume
6
Issue
11
Pages
779-787
ISSN
1074-5521 (ISSN-L)
OpenAlex
W2044681157
Cited by
391
References
35
FWCI
0.98
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
bronze
Licence

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review

How to cite

Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.

This page
CoChat. (2026). Citation check: A ribozyme and a catalytic DNA with peroxidase activity: active sites versus cofactor-binding sites. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1016/s1074-5521(99)80125-2
The paper
Travascio, P., Bennet, A. J., Wang, D. Y., & Sen, D. (1999). A ribozyme and a catalytic DNA with peroxidase activity: active sites versus cofactor-binding sites. Chemistry & Biology. https://doi.org/10.1016/s1074-5521(99)80125-2

Data sources

Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.

Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).

Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.