CoChat
Sign Up
Cited by 87

The application of dialectical behavior therapy to the treatment of eating disorders

Wisniewski, Lucene, Kelly, Elizabeth·2003·Cognitive and Behavioral Practice
DOI 10.1016/s1077-7229(03)80021-4
Open this paper in CoChat — free account

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1016/s1077-7229(03)80021-4

Cites

3 of 3 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

We couldn’t retrieve this paper’s full text, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • Wisniewski and Kelly adapted the biosocial theory of DBT, positing that in addition to having a biological susceptibility to emotion dysregulation, clients with EDs are also susceptible to a nutrition-related vulnerability that affects the body's ability to regulate hunger cues.

    “To improve understanding about the etiology of eating disorders, Wisniewski and Kelly (2003) adapted the biosocial theory of DBT.They posited that in addition to having a biological susceptibility to emotion dysregulation, clients with EDs are also susceptible to a nutrition-related vulnerability that affects the body's ability to regulate hunger cues.”

    From Transdiagnostic applications of DBT for adolescents and adults (2015) · cites this paper as Wisniewski and Kelly (2003)

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Wisniewski, L., & Kelly, E.
Venue
Cognitive and Behavioral Practice
Publisher
Elsevier BV
Published
2003-03
Volume
10
Issue
2
Pages
131-138
ISSN
1077-7229
DOI
10.1016/s1077-7229(03)80021-4
Cited by
87
References
3
Language
en
Licence
www.elsevier.com/tdm/userlicense/1.0/ (tdm)

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review