Cited by 16Eating Disorders and BehaviorsPersonality Disorders and PsychopathologyNutrition, Health and Food Behavior

Acceptance-based skill acquisition and cognitive reappraisal in a culturally responsive treatment for binge eating in adolescence

Kamody, Rebecca C., Thurston, Idia B., Burton, E. Thomaseo·2020·Eating Disorders

Abstract

Emotional overeating, or eating in excess to soothe negative emotions, is a high-risk behavior for the future development of the binge-eating disorder (BED). The Emotional Overeating Intervention (EOI) is a culturally responsive, 10-week condensed dialectical behavior therapy (DBT) skills group intervention for adolescents endorsing emotional-overeating and binge-eating behaviors. The present study served as a secondary analysis of the intervention data, with the aim of using quantitative measures and qualitative interviews to examine intervention acceptability and DBT skill acquisition. Data were analyzed using descriptive statistics for quantitative surveys and qualitative content analysis for interviews. Among the 15 adolescents (Mage = 15.40 years; 73.3% identifying as female; 100% identifying as Black) who participated in the EOI pilot trial, most identified learning acceptance-based DBT skills, particularly radical acceptance, as both highly acceptable and the most useful aspect of treatment. Participants reported increases in distress tolerance appraisal and emotion regulation cognitive reappraisal scale scores from baseline to post-intervention. Accordingly, acceptance-based DBT skills may be associated with change-based cognitive strategies, which may contribute to improvements in emerging BED pathology. Findings serve as an initial step in informing preventative models of scalable interventions for subthreshold BED among adolescents, by identifying variables that warrant investigation as potential mechanisms of change.

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1080/10640266.2020.1731055

Cites

69 of 69 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

This paper’s full text isn’t openly available, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • Low DT has become a key treatment target across both traditional and novel treatment approaches for EDs-B/P.

    “As a result, low DT has become a key treatment target across both traditional and novel treatment approaches for EDs-B/P (Fairburn et al., 2003;Juarascio et al., 2017;Kamody et al., 2020), and one hypothesised mechanism underpinning the co-occurrence between EDs-B/P and other types of impulsive-type psychopathology (Kim and Hodgins, 2018).”

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Kamody, R. C., Thurston, I. B., & Burton, E. T.
Affiliations
  • Yale University (US)
  • University of Tennessee Health Science Center (US)
Corresponding author
Kamody, Rebecca C.
Venue
Eating Disorders
Published
2020-03-03
Volume
28
Issue
2
Pages
184-201
ISSN
  • 1064-0266 (ISSN-L)
  • 1532-530X
OpenAlex
W3010973482
Cited by
16
References
68
Citations by year
2025: 3 · 2024: 3 · 2023: 3 · 2022: 2 · 2021: 4 · 2020: 1
FWCI
1.00
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed
Locations
  • Eating Disorders (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
Topics
  • Social Sciences › Psychology › Clinical Psychology › Eating Disorders and Behaviors
  • Social Sciences › Psychology › Clinical Psychology › Personality Disorders and Psychopathology
  • Health Sciences › Nursing › Nutrition and Dietetics › Nutrition, Health and Food Behavior
Keywords
binge eating, emotional overeating, binge eating disorder, dialectical behavior therapy, radical acceptance, cognitive reappraisal, emotion regulation, distress tolerance, treatment acceptability, culturally sensitive interventions, adolescents, Black adolescents
MeSH terms
Dialectical Behavior Therapy, Emotional Regulation, Adolescent, Culture, Female, Humans, Male, Patient Acceptance of Health Care, Psychotherapy, Group, Binge-Eating Disorder

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review