The DOI matches its Crossref record; 2 of the 2 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
Feature selection for classification
Abstract
Feature selection has been the focus of interest for quite some time and much work has been done. With the creation of huge databases and the consequent requirements for good machine learning techniques, new problems arise and novel approaches to feature selection are in demand. This survey is a comprehensive overview of many existing methods from the 1970's to the present. It identifies four steps of a typical feature selection method, and categorizes the different existing methods in terms of generation procedures and evaluation functions, and reveals hitherto unattempted combinations of generation procedures and evaluation functions. Representative methods are chosen from each category for detailed explanation and discussion via example. Benchmark datasets with different characteristics are used for comparative study. The strengths and weaknesses of different methods are explained. Guidelines for applying feature selection methods are given based on data types and domain characteristics. This survey identifies the future research areas in feature selection, introduces newcomers to this field, and paves the way for practitioners who search for suitable methods for solving domain-specific real-world applications.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cites
Quinlan, J. R. (1986) · Machine Learning · doi:10.1007/bf00116251 · Cited by 21,439
Schaffer, C. (1993) · Machine Learning · doi:10.1023/a:1022653209073 · Cited by 310
Cited by
Particle Swarm Optimization: A Comprehensive Survey
Shami, T. M., El-Saleh, A. A., Alswaitti, M., Al-Tashi, Q., Summakieh, M. A., & Mirjalili, S. (2022) · IEEE Access · doi:10.1109/access.2022.3142859 · Cited by 1,584
Relief-based feature selection: Introduction and review
Urbanowicz, R. J., Meeker, M., La Cava, W., Olson, R. S., & Moore, J. H. (2018) · Journal of Biomedical Informatics · doi:10.1016/j.jbi.2018.07.014 · Cited by 1,311
Particle swarm optimization for feature selection in classification: a multi-objective approach
Xue, B., Zhang, M., & Browne, W. N. (2013) · IEEE Transactions on Cybernetics · doi:10.1109/tsmcb.2012.2227469 · Cited by 1,282
fNIRS-based brain-computer interfaces: a review
Naseer, N., & Hong, K.-S. (2015) · Frontiers in Human Neuroscience · doi:10.3389/fnhum.2015.00003 · Cited by 988
A review of feature selection methods on synthetic data
Bolón-Canedo, V., Sánchez-Maroño, N., & Alonso-Betanzos, A. (2013) · Knowledge and Information Systems · doi:10.1007/s10115-012-0487-8 · Cited by 830
Metadata
- Authors
- DASH, M., & LIU, H.
- Venue
- Intelligent Data Analysis
- Publisher
- SAGE Publications
- Published
- 1997
- Volume
- 1
- Issue
- 1-4
- Pages
- 131-156
- ISSN
- 1088-467X (ISSN-L)
- OpenAlex
- W2133462743
- Cited by
- 3,574
- References
- 2
- FWCI
- 21.40
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Feature selection for classification. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1016/s1088-467x(97)00008-5
- The paper
- DASH, M., & LIU, H. (1997). Feature selection for classification. Intelligent Data Analysis. https://doi.org/10.1016/s1088-467x(97)00008-5
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.