Student or educator? Sign up with your school email and get 6 months of Pro free.
Cited by 202

The DOI matches its Crossref record; 1 of the 1 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.

Prevalence of pain in general practice

Hasselström, Jan, Liu‐Palmgren, Jenny, Rasjö‐Wrååk, Görel·2002·European Journal of Pain

Abstract

OBJECTIVE The aim of this study is to estimate the prevalence and diagnostic pattern of pain at the primary care level during one year in a group practice. This practice serves the patients of a geographically defined area with approximately 14,000 inhabitants. DESIGN Retrospective analysis of all computerised records of a GP group practice during one year, using a combined computerised search technique and manual check‐up. SETTING Tumba Primary Care District, Stockholm County, Sweden. SUBJECTS All records of patients who visited Tumba primary care practice during one year. MAIN OUTCOME MEASURES Pain diagnoses, pain duration, analgesic use, pain category, and referrals. RESULTS Little less than 30% of the patients, who were treated at a primary care practice, had some kind of medically defined pain problem, requiring the attention of a GP. A little less than half of these patients received a prescription for analgesic drugs. The pain diagnoses at a primary care level showed a predominance of musculoskeletal pain. The patients with pain were much older than population and total practice patients. Among the patients, 37% were in a state of acute pain, 37% suffered from chronic pain, 13% had an intermediate pain duration of 1–3 months, and 11% had a chronic intermittent pain condition (predominantly migraine). CONCLUSIONS Painful states of the musculoskeletal system constitute more than 2/3 of painful states in primary care. Viewed from a primary care perspective, pain has a great impact on GPs' day‐to‐day activities and on health economy in general.

Overview

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1016/s1090-3801(02)00025-3

Cites

1 of 1 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Verification

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Citations

Cites

Show all 1 references

Cited by

See all 202

Metadata

Authors
Hasselström, J., Liu‐Palmgren, J., & Rasjö‐Wrååk, G.
Venue
European Journal of Pain
Publisher
Wiley
Published
2002-10
Volume
6
Issue
5
Pages
375-385
ISSN
  • 1090-3801 (ISSN-L)
  • 1532-2149
OpenAlex
W2074304498
Cited by
202
References
1
FWCI
2.98
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review

How to cite

Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.

This page
CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Prevalence of pain in general practice. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1016/s1090-3801(02)00025-3
The paper
Hasselström, J., Liu‐Palmgren, J., & Rasjö‐Wrååk, G. (2002). Prevalence of pain in general practice. European Journal of Pain. https://doi.org/10.1016/s1090-3801(02)00025-3

Data sources

Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.

Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).

Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.