The DOI matches its Crossref record; 1 of the 1 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
Prevalence of pain in general practice
Abstract
OBJECTIVE The aim of this study is to estimate the prevalence and diagnostic pattern of pain at the primary care level during one year in a group practice. This practice serves the patients of a geographically defined area with approximately 14,000 inhabitants. DESIGN Retrospective analysis of all computerised records of a GP group practice during one year, using a combined computerised search technique and manual check‐up. SETTING Tumba Primary Care District, Stockholm County, Sweden. SUBJECTS All records of patients who visited Tumba primary care practice during one year. MAIN OUTCOME MEASURES Pain diagnoses, pain duration, analgesic use, pain category, and referrals. RESULTS Little less than 30% of the patients, who were treated at a primary care practice, had some kind of medically defined pain problem, requiring the attention of a GP. A little less than half of these patients received a prescription for analgesic drugs. The pain diagnoses at a primary care level showed a predominance of musculoskeletal pain. The patients with pain were much older than population and total practice patients. Among the patients, 37% were in a state of acute pain, 37% suffered from chronic pain, 13% had an intermediate pain duration of 1–3 months, and 11% had a chronic intermittent pain condition (predominantly migraine). CONCLUSIONS Painful states of the musculoskeletal system constitute more than 2/3 of painful states in primary care. Viewed from a primary care perspective, pain has a great impact on GPs' day‐to‐day activities and on health economy in general.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cites
Persistent Pain and Well-being: A World Health Organization Study in Primary Care
Gureje, O., Von Korff, M., Simon, G. E., & Gater, R. (1998) · JAMA · doi:10.1001/jama.280.2.147 · Cited by 1,496
Cited by
Samulowitz, A., Gremyr, I., Eriksson, E., & Hensing, G. (2018) · Pain Research and Management · doi:10.1155/2018/6358624 · Cited by 828
Pain in hemodialysis patients: prevalence, cause, severity, and management
Davison, S. N. (2003) · American Journal of Kidney Diseases · doi:10.1053/j.ajkd.2003.08.025 · Cited by 403
Tesarz, J., Schuster, A. K., Hartmann, M., Gerhardt, A., & Eich, W. (2012) · Pain · doi:10.1016/j.pain.2012.03.005 · Cited by 324
Chronic pain in Parkinson's disease: The cross‐sectional French DoPaMiP survey
Nègre‐Pagès, L., Regragui, W., Bouhassira, D., Grandjean, H., & Rascol, O. (2008) · Movement Disorders · doi:10.1002/mds.22142 · Cited by 287
Health anxiety disorders: A cognitive construal
Rachman, S. (2012) · Behaviour Research and Therapy · doi:10.1016/j.brat.2012.05.001 · Cited by 161
Metadata
- Authors
- Hasselström, J., Liu‐Palmgren, J., & Rasjö‐Wrååk, G.
- Venue
- European Journal of Pain
- Publisher
- Wiley
- Published
- 2002-10
- Volume
- 6
- Issue
- 5
- Pages
- 375-385
- ISSN
- 1090-3801 (ISSN-L)
- 1532-2149
- OpenAlex
- W2074304498
- Cited by
- 202
- References
- 1
- FWCI
- 2.98
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Prevalence of pain in general practice. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1016/s1090-3801(02)00025-3
- The paper
- Hasselström, J., Liu‐Palmgren, J., & Rasjö‐Wrååk, G. (2002). Prevalence of pain in general practice. European Journal of Pain. https://doi.org/10.1016/s1090-3801(02)00025-3
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.