772 MEASURING AVOIDANCE, OVERDOING, AND PACING IN PATIENTS WITH CHRONIC PAIN: PSYCHOMETRIC PROPERTIES OF THE PATTERNS OF ACTIVITY MEASURE‐PAIN
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Claims the paper makes
Claims other papers make about this one
Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?
The Cronbach alpha values of the Dutch version of the POAM-P were reported to be in the range 0.80-0.94.
“The Cronbach alpha values of the Dutch version of the scale were reported to be in the range of 0.800.94”
From Turkish Translation of the Patterns of Activity Measure-Pain in Patients with Chronic Low Back and Neck Pain: Validity and Reliability. (2022) · cites this paper as Kindermans et al., 2009
The ICC scores with test-retest reliability were not examined in the original study, the Dutch version or the Spanish translation of the POAM-P.
“The ICC scores with the test-retest reliability was not examined in the original study, the Dutch version, or the Spanish translation.”
From Turkish Translation of the Patterns of Activity Measure-Pain in Patients with Chronic Low Back and Neck Pain: Validity and Reliability. (2022) · cites this paper as Kindermans et al., 2009
The POAM-P was developed in English, and Dutch and French adaptation studies of it have been conducted.
“POAM-P was developed in English. Thereafter, Dutch and French adaptation studies of POAM-P have been conducted, respectively”
From Turkish Translation of the Patterns of Activity Measure-Pain in Patients with Chronic Low Back and Neck Pain: Validity and Reliability. (2022) · cites this paper as Kindermans et al., 2009
Cited by
Sorted by citations
Kindermans, H. P. J., Roelofs, J., Goossens, M. E. J. B., Huijnen, I. P. J., Verbunt, J. A., & Vlaeyen, J. W. S. (2011) · The Journal of Pain · doi:10.1016/j.jpain.2011.04.009 · Cited by 124 · see citing works
“Initial reliability and validity checks of the Dutch version of the POAM-P were satisfactory.(19)”
MethodDifferences in activity‐related behaviour among patients with chronic low back pain
Huijnen, I. P. J., Verbuntl, J. A., Peters, M. L., Smeets, R., Kindermans, H. P. J., Roelofsl, J., Goossens, M. E. J. B., & Seelenl, H. A. M. (2010) · European Journal of Pain · doi:10.1016/j.ejpain.2010.11.015 · Cited by 106 · see citing works
“Significant and meaningful associations with related constructs such as fear of movement and (re)injury, pain catastrophizing, depression, and disability, confirmed the validity of the subscales (Kindermans et al., 2009).”
BackgroundSelf-citationSuygun, E. T., & Celenay, S. T. (2022) · Pain Management Nursing · doi:10.1016/j.pmn.2021.01.008 · Cited by 15 · see citing works
Enomoto, K., Adachi, T., Mibu, A., Tanaka, K., Fukui, S., Nakanishi, M., Iwashita, N., Sasaki, J., & Nishigami, T. (2021) · Research Square · doi:10.21203/rs.3.rs-689513/v1 · Cited by 1 · see citing works
Enomoto, K., Adachi, T., Mibu, A., Tanaka, K., Fukui, S., Nakanishi, M., Iwashita, N., Sasaki, J., & Nishigami, T. (2021) · Research Square · doi:10.21203/rs.3.rs-689513/v2
- Authors
- Kindermans, H., Roelofs, J., Goossens, M., Huijnen, I., Verbunt, J., & Vlaeyen, J.
- Affiliations
- Maastricht University (NL)
- Venue
- European Journal of Pain
- Publisher
- Wiley
- Published
- 2009-09
- Volume
- 13
- Issue
- S1
- ISSN
- 1090-3801 (ISSN-L)
- 1532-2149
- OpenAlex
- W2019851725
- Cited by
- 5
- References
- 0
- Citations by year
- 2021: 3
- FWCI
- 0.48
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
- Locations
- European Journal of Pain (publishedVersion)
- Topics
- Health Sciences › Medicine › Pharmacology › Musculoskeletal pain and rehabilitation
- Social Sciences › Decision Sciences › Management Science and Operations Research › Psychometric Methodologies and Testing
- Health Sciences › Medicine › Anesthesiology and Pain Medicine › Pain Management and Opioid Use
- Keywords
- chronic pain, avoidance behavior, pacing, psychometric properties, activity patterns, pain behavior
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
